Dear huzihaidao12
Please go back to the third line of my last post; I have already agreed that this needs to be done. Just to spell it out in unmistakable detail, I concur with you: a realistic, urgent attitude by India will be helpful for both China and India.
I hope that this statement puts my views beyond doubt, and that you have no further need to refer to this point again! ;-)
I disagree.
A theory formulated by the Brookings Institute, this paper, in 2010, cannot be retrofitted on the Indian government and the bureaucracy for the previous 63 years. The theory can only try to put that government and that bureaucracy's actions within a framework, it cannot create the framework at a point of time before today.
There was never any theoretical formulation of this sort, so its use by the civil service as a piece of cloth is obviously not possible; the use of a non-existent thing is not possible.
Countries do not hold territory depending on how they can solve the infrastructural or other problems of that territory. If I may say this without hurting your feelings, you are making innovations in political science with your statement.
No.
Your post stated:
Do you think the Indian army officers and government officials what is the difference? The military is more honest? Even without public oversight?
I answered that, saying 'Yes'. The military is more honest.
I did not answer saying that the military is without fault.
It is a relative matter; the Indian military is relatively cleaner, compared to the Indian civil service.
The most powerful wing of the Indian government is the Indian Finance Ministry. Corruption takes place among politicians and bureaucrats only if and when the Finance Ministry, and its organs, decide to let it happen. Usually the Finance Minister has to know that something wrong is going on, for it to go on.
There is no affiliation between the Finance Ministry and the military. Military accounts are separately maintained by a branch designated Defence Accounts. These accountants are vigilant in checking examples of 'waste', but not when these are due to the actions of the minister in charge. If you have any examples, I can prove to your entire satisfaction how each originated from the Minister in charge.
I say this because you are unlikely to know the details of the Indian Army's own corruption. That takes the shape of doing favours to each other. The Corps Commander at the time of the Kargil Incident was absent at crucial times, because he was inaugurating a golf tournament in which his son-in-law was playing. Certain senior officers were punished when they bought lawn mowers for maintaining golf greens with surplus funds after buying other transport equipment. A senior general persuaded the local Corps Commander to give a no-objection certificate for the use of a piece of land next to military property, but not military property itself, for building a school, where he was to be the Director after his retirement. These are the cases that occur. The big ones involve politicians exclusively.
Comparing the Indian military to the US is, I am sorry to use harsh words, completely ridiculous.
In this, as in the question of border disputes between India and smaller neighbours, it is your fanciful thinking, not backed, not supported by a single small piece of evidence. We are back to the bachelor being told not to beat his wife.
I am unable to deal with your statements unless you have some facts to put forward. It seems that you are thinking of some other military and addressing these faults to the Indian military.
I am not a militarist, far from it. If anything, I have been bitterly critical of present Indian military leadership, for technical reasons. Knowing them closely as I do, I find these repeated charges of corruption, with no evidence, very disturbing.
Please produce facts; without facts, this amounts only to aggressive needling.
It is indeed, as you pointed out originally, not I. These choices have to be taken by an elected government, because that is the way we work, that is the way we are organised.
In conclusion, I really would like you to examine your posts and see for yourself that making unsupported allegations does not make for a good meaningful discussion. More facts, please, and less of our fears and inclinations.
Regards,