niaz
PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2006
- Messages
- 5,164
- Reaction score
- 211
- Country
- Location
Certainly Implementing the State to State Barter Trade is Logical
Based on weight of goods being exchanged or Quntity which are measurable figures
Example :
Tones of Eatable vegetables vs Barrels of Fuel
Tones of Flour vs Barrels of Fuels
Tones of Sugar vs Barrels of Fuel
Tone of Wheat vs Tones of Coal
Tones of Marbel vs Wood Products (Raw wood for construction)
- And State controls the Distribution of the Goods Nationally , with Local Auctions or Sale at Port Cities like Gawadar / Karachi , the goods are later transported across the country
The goods we have
a) Fish
b) Wheat
c) Fruit
d) Flour
e) Sugar
f) Rice
Are more valueable then what we are really told
If you have food etc you can still live a happy life
But if you had a bag full of currency that is paper based and no one is willing to sell you anything for it you will starve becasue there is no food
In order to determine the value of the goods in Barter, you would still use New York Mercantile Exchange or some other International foum where the values are quoted in dollars. I have personally sold Mexican crude in the 1980’s to Cuba in exchange for their Sugar; the yard stick used was monthly average of the WTI & Sugar price quotes at the Nymex. Thus you can't get away from the Dollar. If you don't believe me, ask any Trading Company dealing with Iran or Cuba.
Besides, in such a scenario, Pakistan State officials responsible for the barter trade would have a field day. It reminds me of a comedy program on PTV long time ago called 'fifty fifty' where, given the choice; would be bride selected a ‘Peon’ at the Customs over a highly qualified engineer.
Last edited: