What's new

The difference between CPC and KMT

why does OP always drag this topic into the forum? the issue between kmt and ccp is purely chinese internal business, not proper to be discussed in a very international, very diversified forum.
 
KMT is a weak party that couldn't make China strong. They loved making China puppets to foreign powers.

KMT army was useless against the Japanese military. If it wasn't for the fightback given by PLA, Japan would have conquered China so easily it would be a sad joke. KMT military provided very little resistance up against Japan while the PLA was left to do all the resistance.

If KMT was ruling China now, China wouldn't be as strong as it today and certainly wouldn't have an independent foreign policy.

Not only did CPC make China strong but did that while still having an independent foreign policy.

Under the CPC, China stood up for itself after 500 years of misery and decline.

Chinese people take things for granted, many don't realise what a precarious situation China faced in those chaotic years. The new generation want to bash the CPC by taking their good life as a given. But these people don't understand that without the CPC, China would be a lost cause.

It was the CPC that rejuvenated China.
 
The new generation want to bash the CPC by taking their good life as a given. But these people don't understand that without the CPC, China would be a lost cause.

Fortunately, the pro-CPC force has fought back in the public opinion in the recent years.

You simply cannot imagine during Hu Jintao's years, the pro-KMT/anti-Mao propaganda was at its peak.
 
Fortunately, the pro-CPC force has fought back in the public opinion in the recent years.

You simply cannot imagine during Hu Jintao's years, the pro-KMT/anti-Mao propaganda was at its peak.

Pretty sure self hate was at its peak in the 80's and early 90's. Remember the movie 河殇? In Hu Jintao years people started to wake up (anti-CNN movement).
 
Fortunately, the pro-CPC force has fought back in the public opinion in the recent years.

You simply cannot imagine during Hu Jintao's years, the pro-KMT/anti-Mao propaganda was at its peak.
I don't think that should attribute to the president Hu, understanding the weakness of the third KMT-CPC cooperation need a process and enough time, as it turned out, KMT still is the shit as it was 70 years. Now we get the lesson: KMT is the teamer like pig for its any cooperator.
 
The one area I, and you have to admire about the CPC, is that they will not afraid to **** with any power if that power dare threaten their existence or harming Chinese interest such as we fought with the USA in Korea War and fought with the Soviet's puppet Vietnam who just signed a mutual defense treaty 3 days ago. That showed some serious ball that you got to admire.
 
Pretty sure self hate was at its peak in the 80's and early 90's. Remember the movie 河殇? In Hu Jintao years people started to wake up (anti-CNN movement).

All these sh1ts started with Hu Yaobang, and he was the mentor of Wen Jiabao and also had good relationship with Hu Jintao.

I don't think that should attribute to the president Hu, understanding the weakness of the third KMT-CPC cooperation need a process and enough time, as it turned out, KMT still is the shit as it was 70 years. Now we get the lesson: KMT is the teamer like pig for its any cooperator.

The pro-KMT force was trying to beat the pro-CPC force in the public opinion in the recent years, but they still failed badly just like 70 years ago.

It just shows that CPC can whip them in both military and public opinion.
 
The pro-KMT force was trying to beat the pro-CPC force in the public opinion in the recent years, but they still failed badly just like 70 years ago.

It just shows that CPC can whip them in both military and public opinion.
05年到今年这十年是果粉泛滥的十年,也是抗日剧泛滥的十年。
 
1.the histroy is usually explained by the mighty survivors,because mighty one has always higher voice
when Soviet was a superpower, the whole world knew that SOviet detroyed 70% of NAZI troops and stalingrad battle was the decisive turing point of WWII.
However, After soviet collpased, more and more people gruadually buy west "explaination" that Normandy, instead of Stalingrad,is the turning point of WWII.

Why? Soviet collpased and Russia is not a suerpower any more, the voice of Russa is overwhelmed by west medias.


2.what CPC is doing with KMT now is just as same as what west medias have been doing with Soviet/Russia for decade.
that is , to explain the hisotry according to its interest,instead of the truth.
as for distorting histroy, west world is the teacher of CPC.


KMT might play a more important role during WWII than CPC,just as stalingrad battle was a more decisive victory than Normandy landing.

however, KMT is loser and weak while CPC is the winner and rules the emgerging superpower CHina.
Thus ,it is fair that CPC has a much higher voice than KMT.

3. KMT doesn't desever any sympathy.
as the loser, KMT always crys like a baby ,but never takes the lesson why KMT is the loser and CPC is the winner.
 
Last edited:
05年到今年这十年是果粉泛滥的十年,也是抗日剧泛滥的十年。

Well, now more people are coming to debunk the myth about the KMT, and most KMT fans are going rogue when their beloved regime got fully exposed.

That's why no one is going to treat them seriously, and the KMT supporters are going to be marginalized day by day.
 
Last edited:
Chiang Kai-shek himself had visited the Yasukuni Shrine.

Even in 1956, he sent his delegation to visit that unholy place.

@Chinese-Dragon, no wonder Nihonjin loves the KMT so much.

1.jpg
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom