What's new

The demise of Pakistan Steel Mill

yayayayayaya.

If Company A can accept making lesser profits/having a lower margin for the same type of goods then Company B, why should the former be blamed for 'dumping' when the latter is the 1 that is incapable of adapting? Why cant the typical worker X working in a steelmill agree to having a $5/hr wage instead of a $10/hr one?

In other words, why should other countries's uncompetitiveness be blamed on China?
No one is blaming China over it since that is how the market works. Like for example here a big company like Wal-Mart that can mass produce Product X compared to a small company that can't mass produce it(let's assume labor rates are the same). In this case the small company wouldn't be able to compete with that bigger company and might even go out of business.
In case of different countries doing this, one of the things that can happen is tariffs are introduced to keep the local production competitive in the market.
Or the government can offer subsidies to local manufacturing to keep them competitive.
Or none of those and it can allow local production to simply lose if it's uncompetitive.
As to adjusting the pay rate for labor...that's not as easy that it can be done on a whim. It depends on many factors. Let's say a company in California paying $10/hour to its workers instead decides that to keep its pricing competitive must pay $5/hour for labor(putting all the laws aside). Simply no one would take up that job. The cost of living would force them to find some other job. This is why companies rather transfer their production overseas where the cost of living is much cheaper and enough demand for jobs that the company can pay a lot less for labor costs and people will still take it.
 
Last edited:
No one is blaming China over it since that is how the market works. Like for example here a big company like Wal-Mart that can mass produce Product X compared to a small company that can't mass produce it(let's assume labor rates are the same). In this case the small company wouldn't be able to compete with that bigger company and might even go out of business.
In case of different countries doing this, one of the things that can happen is tariffs are introduced to keep the local production competitive in the market.
Or the government can offer subsidies to local manufacturing to keep them competitive.
Or none of those and it can allow local production to simply lose if it's uncompetitive.
As to adjusting the pay rate for labor...that's not as easy that it can be done on a whim. It depends on many factors. Let's say a company in California paying $10/hour to its workers instead decides that to keep its pricing competitive must pay $5/hour for labor(putting all the laws aside). Simply no one would take up that job. The cost of living would force them to find some other job. This is why companies rather transfer their production overseas where the cost of living is much cheaper and enough demand for jobs that the company can pay a lot less for labor costs and people are will still take it.

exactly. You correlated the point i was trying to bring.

The thing is everytime I see the kind of rhetorics that certain people of certain nations use(etc. 'Country X is resorting to unfair dumping tactics onto our market! lets impose tariffs on their goods!)- it gives me the itch to simply point it out as an self-consolatory excuse for a nation's own inadaptability.
 
My apologies, i meant to quote Rajarala Chola's post only. You did a good analysis actualy.

like i said, if you cant beat your enemy- join him.

Thanks mate. Indian insulation from Chinese so-called "dumping" is really another topic altogether.

I am actually in favour of balanced approach of importing Chinese steel at low cost for India too if the job elasticities (between sectors) are decent. For that the credit situation in India still needs to improve so the job market can improve for it to happen. Its a very bad situation inherited from the former govt that will use up some more time...along with the new coastal economic zones that are being designed/planned right now.

But for Pakistan its a real no brainer. Close the small capacity production to begin with. Import form China, save money...use that saving to train labour to manufacturing/construction...and you will actually see more jobs created from this over time....because the money/investment is more efficiently used. Effectively its like a steel common market....which is how the European Union originally formed (back when it was purely economic rather than all the political BS).
 
Let me enumerate the use of the steel & products derived from steel:

1. Construction & manufacturing.

Any modern building project, from housing to bridges, uses lot of steel based products such rods, girders etc. No factory or manufacturing concern can be erected without the use of steel plates and vessels made from steel. Construction of coastal defences, docks & ports also employs steel products. Almost all the machine tools and industrial machinery is made out of steel.

2. Energy.

Nearly all energy sector projects depend upon steel. For example steel is essential for making pipelines, storage tanks, pylons & transmission towers and wind turbines, off-shore oil & gas platform & LPG cylinders etc.

3. Transport.

Cars & trucks, railway lines, train carriages & railway engines, cruise ships & oil tankers; all need huge amonut of steel input in the manufacture.

4. Military.

War machinery would not function without steel. Rifles, guns, tanks etc. cannot be manufactured without steel.


5. Household appliances.

Steel is used in the manufacture of fridges, washing machines, cutlery, had tools, ovens & hearths and many other household appliances.

In the light of the above, while I would strongly recommend that PSM should be closed: I consider steel as food of the industry. Steel prices can as easily go back up and in the long run, no developed or developing country can survive without some indigenous steel production.

In my humble opinion, blast furnace, oxygen furnace & the steel purging should be scrapped and all the staff paid off but the basic infrastructure such as the conveyor and the associated plants like coke oven, pig casting & continuous casting plant be left intact.

New state of the art Blast & oxygen furnaces should be installed and the most experienced and competent staff rehired. To avoid future PPP or other gov’ts overloading the steel mill with superfluous staff; National Assembly should put a cap on the total number of staff thru legislation.

It is unlikely that we are going to get foreign funding hence funds have to allocated in the federal budget. (It is not the money is not there. PML-N has spent billions on metro projects; money would have been better spent on revamping the steel plant).

Finally, since examples of successfull civilian run industrial complexes owned by the gov't are few. To avoid a repetition of what happened to the current PSM; the new steel plant should be privatised soon after it is completed.
 
Unrest brewing at Steel Mills, govt warned
KHALEEQ KIANI — UPDATED about 3 hours ago
WHATSAPP
5 COMMENTS
PRINT
ISLAMABAD: The management of Pakistan Steel Mills (PSM) has warned the government that a crisis is brewing at the country’s largest industrial unit due to the non-payment of wages and non-availability of medical facilities for staff and pensioners for several months, which could turn into a law and order problem.

The warning comes at a time when the mills is no longer considered “a going concern” by auditors – meaning it cannot be considered a viable entity and is close to being classified as a ‘dead asset’ – minimising the chances of its fruitful privatisation.

At least $5 billion was spent over the past three years on ‘replacement imports’, to make up for the PSM’s ‘low-to-zero production’.

Workers of a political party are taking part in protests over non-payment of salary
In a note to Finance Minister Ishaq Dar, PSM chief executive officer and federal secretary for industries Khizar Hayat Gondal has said that the workers associated with a political party that is seeking the prime minister’s resignation have allegedly been involved in protests and violence inside the mills in recent days.

Mr Gondal warned that if timely measures were not taken, other restive employees could join the protest, which had been averted “for the time being” through the involvement of police, the Karachi commissioner and the Sindh chief secretary.

According to him, the workers were given certain commitments regarding their main demand for timely payment of monthly salary and other service benefits to serving and former employees.

Mr Gondal said the PSM executive committee had agreed to immediately release a total of Rs183 million on account of medical bills, extreme hardship allowance for heirs of deceased employees as well as leave-related allowances, to ensure that the protest did not spiral out of control.

On top of this, obligatory payments to “avoid disruption of electricity, water and domestic gas” would be made on due date to avert “a humanitarian [crisis]”.

“We are [worse-off] than FY2000, when [then] finance minister Shaukat Aziz is reported to have suggested to then chief executive General Pervez Musharraf to get rid of the PSM, even if it was possible at the notional price of Re1,” a senior official told Dawn, adding that privatising the mills now would require a huge financial injection.

The PSM has already leased out about 157 acres of prime land to the Port Qasim Authority for Rs1.467bn on a 30-year extendable lease to ensure emergency payments on account of unpaid utility bills. This is evident from an auditor’s report, sent to the Privatisation Commission a few weeks ago, which called upon the government to “ultimately resolve the issue of going concern” to complete a two-year audit of the PSM, without which, privatisation and due diligence will be affected.

This necessitates the commitment that until privatisation, the federal government will pay net cash salaries to the PSM employees and that “[government of Pakistan] has neither the intention nor necessity [to] materially curtail its area of operation and has no intention to liquidate PSM”.

On the other hand, PSM’s Peoples Workers Union – which is the mills’ current collective bargaining agent (CBA) – has reported to the government that losses and liabilities of the mills have crossed the Rs400bn mark on Aug 31, 2016, as compared to Rs10.4bn accumulated profit on June 30, 2008.

In a letter to the federal government, the CBA union recalled that the losses and liabilities doubled – from Rs200bn in June 2013 to Rs400bn now – mainly due to the indifference of the board of directors, federal ministries and other stakeholders.

“This unfortunate situation leaves us no path open but that of public protest,” the Peoples Union CBA wrote to various ministries and the board of directors. It deplored that although the government had given commitments to international lenders to appoint a professional board of directors, the PSM was still led by an ad hoc leadership.

The union has claimed that the mills could still be revived, provided it was given to a professional board of directors, chief executive and a chief financial officer from the finance ministry with the required funds. This would protect the country from foreign exchange loss in the shape of imported iron and steel items and support the balance of payments, it added.
 
Pakistan’s Self Proclaimed Master of Finance Set Out to Destroy PSM!

pakistans-self-proclaimed-master-of-finance-set-out-to-destroy-psm.jpg




On 1st December Ishaq Dar ordered the Pakistan Steel Mills to settle its debts to the state owned banks as well as foreign creditors. In a drive to privatize National institutions, Pakistan Steel Mills has been finalized to be privatized and investors from China have shown interest to bid when its privatization process starts. Moonis Elahi pointed out that PSM has been reporting losses since a decade and neither the Zardari nor PMLN government could assign talented people to take its charge and bring it out of the mess it has fallen due to corruption. The workers have been staging protests as their salaries haven’t been transferred since months.

In a meeting held at Islamabad between the Finance Minister Ishaq Dar, PSM Management and Privatization Committee, the issue of PSM’s outstanding debts was discussed. The minister issued orders for the steel mills to sell its assets and settle the Rs. 51 billion loan it owes. Moonis Elahi has said the nation is in shock over the news and widely questions if the Sharif brothers policies can make their personal steel mills to reap billions of profits a year, why are they hesitant to implement the same policies for a State owned company that could have saved it from destruction? If assets are sold, the company would further decline in value and it would soon be worthless. The country’s largest industrial unit had been shut down for over a year and a half after SSGC had cut its gas supply over defaulting its Rs. 18 billion in terms of outstanding gas bills.
 
Demise is almost certain if you buy rampantly from China. I say force the Chinese to set up foundaries in Pakistan , employing Pakistani people.
Friendship does not mean one sided trade.
 
Demise is almost certain if you buy rampantly from China. I say force the Chinese to set up foundaries in Pakistan , employing Pakistani people.
Friendship does not mean one sided trade.


If you read the article, the problem isn't the Chinese.

What went wrong at PSM is a common occurrence in state-run institutions. Too much bureaucracy, political interference, waste, inefficiency, lethargy, unions, etc. Above all, the mindset, "What is the worst that can happen? Bankruptcy? No worries the tax payers will rescue us!"
 
Government All Set To Lease Pakistan Steel Mills!

pmln-government-all-set-to-lease-pakistan-steel-mills-and-pia.jpg




Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif announced his children Hassan & Hussain are blessed with amazing business managing abilities. At the tender age of 16 they had become billionaires by running their steel mills, one of the most successful businesses all over the world Lakshmi Mittal is a fair example of a “King of Steel”. Sadly, state owned Pakistan steel mills couldn’t be handled by PMLN leadership and it is now set up for lease to a foreign country.

nawaz-sharif-announced-lease-pakistan-steel-mills.png


Moonis Elahi, Imran Khan, Chaudhry Pervaiz and many other prominent opposition leaders have expressed their concerns over such decisions. Inability to revive the steel mill in 3 years proves incompetence of the N league.

The premier has finally been taken to court over the Panama Leaks issue, the nation demands to know if you can’t run state owned businesses to be profitable, how is it possible that your personal businesses flourish but every government business fails under your leadership? Where do their earnings go?

To me as an ordinary citizen of Pakistan it is quite disturbing to know that most of our national businesses have totally collapsed. In my search to find the truth about PMLN’s abilities I began skimming through official accounts on Twitter (as it is mostly accurate and is updated frequently) of our prominent leaders.

This one made me bang my head on the desk:

ahsan-iqbal-emerging-market.png


How Mr Ahsan Iqbal do you claim Pakistan to be an emerging market? Leasing out factories doesn’t mean investors are considering your country as an emerging market but if new factories are set up and new entrants enter the competition then we can call it progressive. To me as a common man who faces common problems throughout the year, this is just fake publicity.

We didn’t have electricity throughout summer to support factories and businesses and now its winter and we don’t have Gas! Utility bill prices are hiked with the arrival of a new season and yet every institution reports loss. You need loans for every project and even to run the country every month and still we are in lead? Our textile industry is now doomed because winter is coming and your government has announced gas load shedding.

I then came across a tweet by Moonis Elahi:

moonis-elahi-tweet-regarding-pia-and-pakistan-steel-mills.png


Though this isn’t directly aimed towards the PSM decision but truly portrays what our incumbent government is capable of. To add injury to insult, PIA also reflects their inefficiency and we’ve heard rumors in the past it was up for lease too but that didn’t happen. PIA is another state owned business that files losses each year but our leaders in power aren’t concerned by it. They rather build new Metro trains and Metro buses but can’t make reforms in national policy to bring back national railways and other national businesses to their feet. Mr. Moonis Elahi has said it in the best way.

The headline in Dawn made my heart sink as I read Chinese and Iranian firms are interested to take over our loss bearing Pakistan Steel Mills. If these companies are willing to take over, they must be sure it is profitable so why can’t Pakistan? Obviously the monthly profits will fly off to the country that succeeds in the bidding. But this profit could have been used for the benefit of our own nation.

Money acquired from leasing it will be a onetime payment and God knows where will it be used, to buy another luxury flat through some offshore company or to buy Rolex’s for the Sharif and family? Mr. Ahsan Iqbal, may your claims be true and my fears prove to be wrong, but I couldn’t disagree with the Tweet by Moonis Elahi that N League may be full of successful businessmen but they aren’t willing to promote state owned businesses.
 
I dnt know much but i think leasing is good option . My opinion
 
Last edited:
It is high time for the Govt to get rid of PSM along with PIA and Pakistan Railways.
 
I have written before that the steel mill is a white elephant and should be have been closed down long ago. I see here many emotional outbursts about politicians and remarks about steel mill which bear no relationship with the reality. I was in Pakistan when PSM project was initiated and have tried to follow its progress ever since. I seek your indulgence to read my views about why the steel mill has been a drain on Pakistan economy for so long.

Pakistan Steel Mill foundation stone was laid by ZA Bhutto in 1973 with the funding assaistance by USSR and technical supervison of V/O Tiajproexport.. Starting in 1973, it took nearly 12 years to complete and cost Rs 24.7-billion to build (about $1-billion at the exchange rate of that period). Spread over 14,600 acres, it is the largest industrial complex in Pakistan to date.

Based on the Soviet technology, it was not state of art even at its birth and got into financial problems right from the start. There were many reasons.

Firstly, the top management under the Zia and later under the PPP & Nawaz Sharif regimes was mostly incompetent and seldom appointed on merit. Against projected requirement of about 15,000 employees, en-mass recruitment during the first Benazir gov’t resulted in PSM having 23,000 employees by the mid-1990s'. Later civilian gov’ts and especially the Zardari period meant PSM having almost 30,000 staff including the daily workers. Thus manpower costs are too high.

Very high Debt to Equity ratio (Highly financial leverage) translated into Debt charges higher than the gross profit. Net result being that PSM suffered losses during first 3 years of operation. 1988-1989 was the first time PSM made profit but went into the red again from the very next year.

Its capacity utilisation was close to 90 percent initially but in 1991 it was down to 62%. According to a report published Dawn on Oct 5, 2015, PSM’s accumulated losses and liabilities, which stood at Rs26- billion at end-2008, had increased to Rs350-billion, including Rs160- billion in losses and Rs190-billion in payable debt liabilities. In addition, the government has injected over Rs85-billion out of the federal budget in different bailout package. 79% of PSM assets are the shape of land. As of March 2015, estimated assets were Rs 280-billion with land, whereas liabilities were Rs 174. Thus PSM has severe liquidity problem and unable to pay either the employee wages or the creditors.

PSM performed better during Musharraf time and made a profit of Rs 2.7-billion in 2007. To be honest, it was not due a magic wand in the hands of Shaukat Aziz but mainly because steel prices at that time were very high. It is much easier to sell a profit making company than a loss making one. But thanks to the worst CJ (Ch. Iftikkar Ahmed) in the history of Pakistan, that sale deal was nullified.

Since 2008-09, PSM has had seven consecutive years of losses, which now amount to 87pc of its total assets. One the reasons being the severe under-utilization of capacity (currently at 2%) due to liquidity issues, but also because of the international factors.

Below is a graph of interantional steel prices in $ per metric ton.

View attachment 348032


These days no country can compete with Chinese steel. China’s share of the international steel market has been growing steadily at the expense of traditional steel makers such as Germany, Japan & Britain. At more than 800-million tons and with exports exceeding 100-million tons per year. China is currently world largest steel producer and exporter.Chinese steel is cheaper than the cost of production in UK. Understand US Steel is laying off 25% of her labour force.

Under these circumstances, how can an outdated plant such as PSM can afford to exist?

Finally, I freely admit that I have surfed the internet including the Wikipedia in writing this post. So please no sarcastic remarks. However, if there is a mis-reporting of facts, correction will be more than welcome.


14600 acres???

Convert this place to SEZ and let private investor to invest in this massive area.
As far as I remember, we converted few of those mills like Bangladesh Steel Mill and Adamji jute mills to SEZ where there are already 100's of factories set up by private sectors.

You dont need that much land for a steel mill to begin with.
 
14600 acres???

Convert this place to SEZ and let private investor to invest in this massive area.
As far as I remember, we converted few of those mills like Bangladesh Steel Mill and Adamji jute mills to SEZ where there are already 100's of factories set up by private sectors.

You dont need that much land for a steel mill to begin with.

Honourable Sir,

Steel mills using scrap iron as feed don’t need to be on a large area because all that is required is an Electric Arc Furnace, but factories starting out with the iron ore are spread over vast area. The world famous Edgar Thomas Steel Works started by Andrew Carnegie back in 1872 was originally on a 200 acre site. But it was basically a Bessemer Converter making steel rails. Don’t know the current area but I took a tour of the Steel Valley, Pittsburgh in the summer of 1970; the valley is large enough to house a few cities.

Most steel mills are constructed on large areas to have sufficient room for future expansion. PSM was also supposed to double its capacity after a few years. The area also depends upon what other auxiliary processes /operations are carried out on the premises.

Pakistan Steel Mills limited total area in about 75 square kilometres. On the other hand the entire town of Jamshedpur (originally a village called Sachi); Jharkhand in India has grown around the Tata Steel & Iron Company complex which is spread over an area of about 150 square kilometres
 
Niaz sb,

Does the govt need to be in steelmaking biz especially if all the key components (iron ore, coal etc) anyway have to be imported. You say it has 75 sq km area and that too in Khi proper, that means 18000 acres of prime land. Why not sell the land? The money raised could be humungous and can be used for lot of social spend or capex or augmenting Pak military capacities.

Regards
 
Niaz sb,

Does the govt need to be in steelmaking biz especially if all the key components (iron ore, coal etc) anyway have to be imported. You say it has 75 sq km area and that too in Khi proper, that means 18000 acres of prime land. Why not sell the land? The money raised could be humungous and can be used for lot of social spend or capex or augmenting Pak military capacities.

Regards

.

Why does not GOP want to be in the steel making business? I am not in the the Gov't so can't answer that.

It is located about 40 kilometers from Karachi in the Landhi Industrial area. It had been sold to Mitthal for $500-million during Musharraf time, but Supreme Court nullified the sale. GOp has sunk in more that 3 times in subsidies since, but that's Pakistan's politics.
 

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom