One thing is quite clear to me. The less the the influence of America and Europe in middle east, the better it is for us.
Wrong, and wont happen your absolutely wrong, too much strings attached to this. This is like calling if we had 700bn$ defence budget thigns would be nice for us.Each country in middle east has its own country if choice, Turkey is pro-US , Israel is pro-US, Saudi is PRO-US, wtf you can do?
Remeber we are progressing quite fast, and require energy for future developments and to sustain the pace. We can not keep an unhindered flow of OIL from gulf, untill Uncle is flexing muscles there.
IPI Pipeline is good beginning, What we can do is join with US in sharing the oil, I'm sure they wont deny us that after they already gave us a important role other than our own in Indian Ocean.
Same is bothering China. China also do not want to loose an important energy source. Although at the moment they are pressurising Iran for abaondoning the program. But they will not approve any thing that violate thier access to energy. If they get any alternative, the issue would be different.
I care the hell what China does, because it is not in Indian interest, We can buy oil fields better with US leverage because we wont be facing the money competition from China.
Iran can dimish the influence of Uncle SAM only by having a nuke capability. This will automatically translate in an advantage for us.
Wrong.
It is another fact that IAEA has not found a single evidence against NPT or its violation in Iran, although they did the most extensive searches ever done against any country for the nuclear program.
Wrong, Iranians didnt let them inside Centrifuge plant and IAEA has reported they are trying to go nuclear.
This is exactly the case. But remember, we can not play like this untill they are capable to defend themselves from any aggression, including against Israel, Uncle SAM or even say, Saudi (Although I do not subscribe to this theory). As you said correctly the middle east politcs is quite complex. Thier stable status would make it easy for us to find a sustained market here.
Other fact is that nukes are NOT meant for use between two parties, if BOTH have the capability to use them! It will automatically trabnslate ina stable middle east. This is what Israel and USA do not want. they need chaos there. So that they can 'Hunt' easily. The cost will be not only paid by entire middle east but by countries who want to benefit from there, including us.
I think I am quite clear here.
Kashif
This is exactly you are making a huge mistake, let me say,
Israel has nothing against Iran , They dont even share a border, a Nuke capable Iran is not what ISRAELS interest calls for and for that matter our interest with respect to UN and Israel as a ally, and that is what is against Israel, my conscience tells me having nuke capability and getting bombed is not what I would choose over playing soft diplomacy and creating proper economy with relations with India and EU.
We need to Develope Iran not create Iran how to deter themselves, I have explain pretty clearly If IRan declares we want energy through nukes, US and Saudi will be in trouble, your ommiting the arabian factor here their interest will be more jeopardised if IRan developes!!! they dont want IRan to PUMP MORE OIL THAN THEM!
both nukes will make stable middle east? This is wrong because it looks good on paper not practicality.