What's new

The conspiracy to kill President Zia

bluesky

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 14, 2016
Messages
16,515
Reaction score
-4
Country
Bangladesh
Location
Japan
Though a half-educated man, I have a hobby to read history. Sometimes I try to post a few passages of history that I have read here and there. I understand that this Bangladesh Forum of the PDF is quite different from some other forums, and is not a place to discuss about serious topics.

Yet, I am posting a part of history written by a renowned Freedom Fighter, named Motiur Rahman Rentu. The passages are the direct translation of his book named, 'Amar Fashi Chai,' or 'I want my own Hanging by Rope.' I am not the translator.

The passage below writes of the conspiracy to kill the popular President Ziaur Rahman. I have no political affiliation and I am posting the topic in the hope that people will know about a part of the then real history of Bangladesh. Rentu belonged to the inner circle of Awami League and he fought under Kader Siddiqui against the BA after the killing of Bangbandhu. But, he wrote what his eyes saw and his ears heard. @bluesky

THE 30 MAY 1981 ASSASSINATION OF PRESIDENT ZIA
From 'Amar Fashi Chai' written by Motiur Rahman Rentu (a Freedom Fighter)

On 23 and 24 May 81, an urgent secret meeting of freedom fighters of 71 and 75 and some former members of the Army was held in the seminar room of the T.S.C. of Dhaka University. In that meeting, Colonel Shawkat Ali (at present Awamni League M.P. and an accused in the Agartala Conspiracy case) informed the meeting of the plan to assassinate freedom fighter President Ziaur Rahman and told what to do during and after the killing.

Colonel Shawkat Ali said that under the leadership of the G.O.C. Chittagong Major General Manzur Bir Uttam Zia would be killed and that our leader Shaikh Hasina had the knowledge of this plan for assassination. Our leader had instructed us to help and play a role in this plan. Awami League President Shaikh Hasina had returned home only a few days ago; how could she give a directive of this nature?

When asked, Colonel Shawkat replied that Shaikh Hasina had been informed while she had been out of the country in India. When asked as to what we were to do during and after the killing, Colonel Shawkat said that we would have to stay in Chittagong and Dhaka; those who would be in Chittagong should take the responsibility of coming to Dhaka after collecting arms from General Manzur; and those who could be in Dhaka should establish control over important places like radio and television centers with these weapons.

In reply to a question from one of us, he said that anytime from now the assassination could take place. As soon as Ziaur Rahman would visit Chittagong, he would be killed. Colonel Shawkat said that we would have to stay in Chittagong and Dhaka; those who would be in Chittagong should take the responsibility of coming to Dhaka after collecting arms from General Manzur; and those who could be in Dhaka should establish control over important places like radio and television centers with these weapons.

Colonel Shawkat also said that until Zia was killed, Chief of Staff of the Army Gcneral H.M.Ershad and other Generals in Dhaka as well as Colonel Mahfuzur Rahman of the President’s Guard Regiment would remain with the leader of the uprising, General Manzur. After the assassination, they would be divided. The Generals of Dhaka and the repatriated officers and troops from Pakistan would remain with the chief of staff.

On the other side, General Manzur would give leadership to the freedom fighter officers and troops of Chittagong. After the killing of General Zia, there would be a fight between the troops loyal to General Ershad and those loyal to General Manzur. In this battle, one side would be totally defeated by the other, though the victor would be very week. At this moment, we should attack the weak victors and defeat them. This was our task during and after the assassination.

In this secret and urgent meeting were present about 70 or 75 people, including Colonel Ghaffar, Major Nasir, Captain Hafiz and a few others, who had a role in the uprising on 3 November 75. In this meeting we were divided into three groups. One group was given the responsibility of going to Chittagong to collect weapons from General Manzur. The second group of about 30 or 35 pet-sons was entrusted with the work of travelling all over the country to inform the plan and to prepare all anti-Zia freedom fighters to take any type of action. The rest belonging to the third group would stay in Dhaka, and make preparation for action.

After President Ziaur Rahman arrived Chittagong a few Army officers under the leadership of General Manzur organized the uprising and at the dawn of 30th November killed freedom fighter Ziaur Rahman in the Chittagong Circuit House with little opposition. Yet, the troops and the general public rejected this killing. Officers obedient to General Manzur occupied Chittagong Radio and Television centers and kept these under their control. On this side in Dhaka, Chief of the Army General Ershad, General Mir Shawkat Bir Uttam, General Rahman and other officers and troops took position against General Manzur.
 
.
I understand that this Bangladesh Forum of the PDF is quite different from some other forums, and is not a place to discuss about serious topics
not our fault
apny hi giraaty hain nashyman py bijliyan
 
.
1981 .... I thought this thread was about Gen Zia
 
.
Good riddance. Alhamdulillah this time the plan was successful to make BD free from that tyranny, after 20+ attempt. Many people tried it but only people of Comilla could finally do it. Im proud some of my family members were involved in that operation. Sheikh Hasina can change that day as her birthday celebration, like Khaleda. People should tolerate unplanned structures in front of Parliament building to honour him unnecessary.


800px-Baqi_Othman.jpg

This is the tomb of Great Caliph Hazrat Uthman once the baadshah of whole Muslim world


ziasmazar51.jpg

And this is the tomb of Zia


What an irony.
 
.
I wonder why people turned out in hundreds of thousands for the funeral of this EVIL tyrant Ziaur Rahman, making his funeral the largest gathering for any Bangladeshi politician, especially, when this EVIL Zia was the one who moved Bangladesh away from the path of Shonar Bangla under the prudent leadership of BAKSAL and the divine protection of Jatiyo Rokkhi Bahini... Must be the EVIL razakars... I tell you, these EVIL razakars...
 
.
I wonder why people turned out in hundreds of thousands for the funeral of this EVIL tyrant Ziaur Rahman, making his funeral the largest gathering for any Bangladeshi politician, especially, when this EVIL Zia was the one who moved Bangladesh away from the path of Shonar Bangla under the prudent leadership of BAKSAL and the divine protection of Jatiyo Rokkhi Bahini... Must be the EVIL razakars... I tell you, these EVIL razakars...

Yes razakars. He made way for the razakars only. Thats his only achievement. Apart from the BAKSAL Rokhi Bahini propaganda, he couldnt even achieve close to anything in his 6 years, what SM achieved in 3 years as a war torn country. That could be achieved at the and of last years of Ershad. So SM 3 years achievement = Zia + Ershad's 14 years rule. And in the 90s we are in square 1 to what SM left behind.

The funeral of Razakar lord Golam Azam was attended by large crowd, this is the state of the country under freedom.

janaza-of-ghulam-azam.jpg




BD economy.png


https://www.google.com.bd/publicdat...00&tend=743968800000&hl=en_US&dl=en&ind=false
 
.
Good riddance. Alhamdulillah this time the plan was successful to make BD free from that tyranny, after 20+ attempt. Many people tried it but only people of Comilla could finally do it. Im proud some of my family members were involved in that operation. Sheikh Hasina can change that day as her birthday celebration, like Khaleda. People should tolerate unplanned structures in front of Parliament building to honour him unnecessary.


800px-Baqi_Othman.jpg

This is the tomb of Great Caliph Hazrat Uthman once the baadshah of whole Muslim world


ziasmazar51.jpg

And this is the tomb of Zia
What an irony.

Is it not true that Zia was a savior of Bangladesh and he came to the front of politics just by the token of a chance. Now, we find in the writing of Rentu and many other sources that there was a large conspiracy to kill him so that the country could be destabilized. He was killed only a few days after Sheikha Hasina came back from her long stay in India. Her name has also been uttered by Rentu in the passage I have posted.

Things should be seen in their proper perspectives and a post should be written in an objective way. A person's achievements must be praised, specially if that person was a Head of State. Unfortunately, you have failed to do so. Spitting to the sky brings it down on your own very face. Following a die hard party line is a culture not to be seen in any other country. This is why there is social degradation in BD. This degradation cannot though be measured by the GDP.
 
.
Yes razakars. He made way for the razakars only. Thats his only achievement. Apart from the BAKSAL Rokhi Bahini propaganda,

Rokkhi Bahini is certaily not a propaganda. Ask your seniors how many JASHAD workers were killed until '75 August. It is more than 30,000. Razaakars were given general amnesty by Bangabandhu and there was no law to prohibit a Razakar from politics. Zia did not overdo any thing. His wife and SHW both did. SHW held many meetings with Golam Azam and other Razakars. But, the topic is about Zia and not about others.

More or less 400,000 people died of hunger and malnutrition during the period when you think it was a high GDP. I understand there was an international politics to keep BD hungry. After Zia came the prices (specially rice came down to Tk.6/kg from Tk.10 or more) stabilized and corruption stopped (not altogether, though). Only because of Zia's patriotism and almost selfless activities, the people of BD started to love him and were without a worry about an Indian aggression.
 
.
Rokkhi Bahini is certaily not a propaganda. Ask your seniors how many JASHAD workers were killed until '75 August. It is more than 30,000. Razaakars were given general amnesty by Bangabandhu and there was no law to prohibit a Razakar from politics. Zia did not overdo any thing. His wife and SHW both did. SHW held many meetings with Golam Azam and other Razakars. But, the topic is about Zia and not about others.

More or less 400,000 people died of hunger and malnutrition during the period when you think it was a high GDP. I understand there was an international politics to keep BD hungry. After Zia came the prices (specially rice came down to Tk.6/kg from Tk.10 or more) stabilized and corruption stopped (not altogether, though). Only because of Zia's patriotism and almost selfless activities, the people of BD started to love him and were without a worry about an Indian aggression.

This is general knowledge, jamaat and other parties who collaborated with Pak Army was banned during SM era but general amnesty was given to normal supporters but war criminals were to be tried. And top war criminals fled to Pak and ME. After coming to power Zia allowed them in the country and provided citizenship. Jamaat was allowed to do politics again. Zia seized power only to empower Jamaat. BNP is BS mid term rajakar plan while they grow as sideshow. In first phase turn normal BD people to BNP then turn all of them to Jamaat, this is the plan. As BNP/JeI both grew large in the mean time SHW has no other way other than negotiate to penetrate. As SHW grows more powerful she gives bamboo as we see today. And other leftists Islamists terrorists were growing at large during SM to destabilize the country were in ISI pay. It was necessary to clean them as you have a safe country free of Sarboharas. And soon country will be free of JeI menace. During Zia and Ershad lots of false info were fed to people but they were all BS, to give legitimacy to illegal zia and to create killing ground to patriotic elements of BD. It will take time to clean.
 
.
1.Rentu used to be SHW's PA. His book is quite informative, and in fact, predicts SHW's tyranny in power.

2. The top cadet of the first JRB course under RAW in India, Muzaffar, was the only officer who had managed to escape after the killing. Thereafter, he has lived under RAW shelter in Diamond Harbor area, Kolkata assuming a Hindu name and identity. His wife and kids also at Hindus. During BAL rule - as at present, he comes back to the country. Currently he is said to be living in Kachukhet and working to get his pension, etc.
 
.
After coming to power Zia allowed them in the country and provided citizenship.

Which Razakaar you are talking about I do not know. But, if it is Razaakar Golam Azam, he came back to his native country and filed a petition to the Court to restore his citizenship. The Court gave back his citizenship. I do not think, Zia had any jurisdiction over the Judiciary.
 
.
Which Razakaar you are talking about I do not know. But, if it is Razaakar Golam Azam, he came back to his native country and filed a petition to the Court to restore his citizenship. The Court gave back his citizenship. I do not think, Zia had any jurisdiction over the Judiciary.

You should do some homework before replying random. These are general knowledge. Really irritating. Every joe cant land in the country and have safe passage, especially if has bounty on his head. Only possible during anti forces in power. If patriotic people were in power he would straight go to hell no court petition.

Government of newly independent Bangladesh, banned Jamaat-e-Islami and cancelled Azam's citizenship due to his alleged role during the Bangladesh Liberation War.[22] Azam lived in exile in London until he was allowed to return home in 1978.[25]

Jamaat's rehabilitation began when Ziaur Rahman became president after a coup in 1975 and lifted the previous ban on religious parties. In 1977, Zia removed secularism in the constitution, replacing it with Islamic ideals, further clearing the way for Jamaat-e-Islami to return to political participation.[25] In 1978 Azam returned to Bangladesh on a temporary visa with a Pakistani passport and stayed as a Pakistani national after his visa expired, refusing to leave a country he considered his home by birth-right.

In the 1980s, Azam was particularly critical of the military rule of General Ershad after he seized power in a bloodless coup in 1982 and Jamaat-e-Islami took part in demonstrations and strikes as well as other opposition parties such as the Awami League and the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP). He proposed a caretaker government system to facilitate free and fair elections, which was adopted in 1990. In the Bangladeshi general election, 1991, Jamaat-e-Islami won 18 seats and its support allowed the BNP to form a government.[25]

During this time, he acted unofficially as the Ameer of Jamaat-e-Islami until 1991, when he was officially elected to the post. This led to the government arresting him and an unofficial court called The People's Court was established by civilians such as Jahanara Imam to try alleged war criminals and anti-independence activists. Imam held a symbolic trial of Azam where thousands of people gathered and gave the verdict that Azam's offences committed during the Liberation War deserve capital punishment.[60] In 1994, he fought a lengthy legal battle which resulted in the Supreme Court of Bangladesh ruling in his favour and restoring his nationality.[25]

In the 1996 election, Jamaat won only three seats, and most of their candidates lost their deposits.[61] Azam announced his retirement from active politics in late 2000. He was succeeded by Motiur Rahman Nizami.[8]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghulam_Azam
 
.
Zia seized power only to empower Jamaat

Zia never seized power. Read the Rentu's book instead of believing the party propaganda. There are hundred other books that say, COAS Zia and his Deputy, khaled Mosharref, both wanted to vacate the President's Office of the Majors and Colonels. Zia wanted to wait for an appropriate time, and Musharref wanted a hasty action.

Because of this mismatch, Musharref went ahead and detained Zia, the COAS. Musharref took the Oath as COAS by the then President Kh. Mustaque Ahmed, who was from BAL and BAKSAL. Immediately after this Oath taking, Musharref sacked President Mustaque and appointed Justice Sayem as the new President.

Subsequently, a group of anti-Musherraf army Jawans rebelled against General Khaled Musharref, the new COAS. They released Zia and rebelled against Musharref. Musharref was killed and Zia was reinstated again to the post of COAS. Unnecessary, so I did not write the role of Col. Taher.

Can you pinpoint any misstatements about the sequence of events that unfurled from 3rd to 9th Nov. 1975 that I have accounted above? If no, then how do you plainly and nakedly claim Zia seized power, and only to empower Zamaat? This is not true.

Currently he is said to be living in Kachukhet and working to get his pension, etc.
Controversial author of 'Amar Fashi Chai' dies in Paris
Staff Correspondent, bdnews24.com

Published: 2007-11-10 17:50:38.0 BdST Updated: 2007-11-10 17:50:38.0 BdST

Motiur Rahman Rentu, the veteran freedom fighter and author of the controversial book Amar Fashi Chai, died in Paris Saturday after a battle with lung cancer.

Rentu's nephew Bablu told bdnews24.com by telephone from Paris that his uncle had succumbed to cancer and would be buried in Paris. Rentu was 53 and is survived by his wife and two daughters.

bdnews24.com/sr/am/2349 hour
 
. .
Zia never seized power. Read the Rentu's book instead of believing the party propaganda. There are hundred other books that say, COAS Zia and his Deputy, khaled Mosharref, both wanted to vacate the President's Office of the Majors and Colonels. Zia wanted to wait for an appropriate time, and Musharref wanted a hasty action.

Because of this mismatch, Musharref went ahead and detained Zia, the COAS. Musharref took the Oath as COAS by the then President Kh. Mustaque Ahmed, who was from BAL and BAKSAL. Immediately after this Oath taking, Musharref sacked President Mustaque and appointed Justice Sayem as the new President.

Subsequently, a group of anti-Musherraf army Jawans rebelled against General Khaled Musharref, the new COAS. They released Zia and rebelled against Musharref. Musharref was killed and Zia was reinstated again to the post of COAS. Unnecessary, so I did not write the role of Col. Taher.

Can you pinpoint any misstatements about the sequence of events that unfurled from 3rd to 9th Nov. 1975 that I have accounted above? If no, then how do you plainly and nakedly claim Zia seized power, and only to empower Zamaat? This is not true.

Look Zia was a potent tool for the anti BD elements. Maybe you have mistaken him by my words of something great. But he was just puppet show. The plan was to install him from start, so that people cant ask questions seeing his past patriotic image and all anti BD things happen behind the curtain. Patriotic people were at gun point if they didnt cooperate they were just killed point blank like famous jail killing, SM assassination or Mosharraf. If BD patriot Musharraf could take power, BD would be different today but killed by the fanatic Zia's soldiers. There was a tug of war between army generals on western instigation. During 1971 war, English journalist made special interview on Zia and Khaled getting a clue that BD is going to be independent and predicted some of the MB elements will be future leader and see after some years killed elected representatives and started fight among themselves for power. Mosharraf was a proponent of Mujibism so Taher supported Zia as Taher's leader Sarbahara Siraj was eliminated by Mujb force but irony is Taher was later killed by Zia to seal his power. And you are talking here about this book rentu pentu during 3rd nov to 9th nov. But Zia already seized power killing SM and was running gov behind the scene as COAS 24 Aug to 3rd nov 1975 and a break of some days till feb 1979



Ah That explains. I was confused before. Your antagonism of Major Zia didn't make sense to me until now. Keep up the good work of your ancestors.


Yes I see him as 75's Mirjafar.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom