What's new

The Coming China-India Conflict: Is War Inevitable?

fallstuff

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Nov 20, 2009
Messages
9,441
Reaction score
0
Country
Bangladesh
Location
United States
The Coming China-India Conflict: Is War Inevitable?
By Ishaan Tharoor


b19ce5a696a978d0d4703314cc95d7f8.jpg

A Chinese soldier stands with an Indian soldier at the ancient Nathu La border crossing between India and China



By sheer demographics, it's the world's most important relationship. China and India comprise 40% of humanity and boast economies that are expected to loom large over the 21st century. They also represent two of the world's fastest-growing militaries, armed with nuclear weapons, and are expanding their spheres of influence across oceans. Jonathan Holslag, a Brussels-based scholar of Chinese foreign policy and author of the recent book China and India: Prospects for Peace, is among a growing number of observers who have dismissed the idea of "Chindia" — a term once often invoked, expressing optimism over the joint geopolitical rise of the two Asian giants. He spoke to TIME about the fault lines between the two neighbors, Washington's place in the region and how tensions could escalate into war.

The subheading of your book — "Prospects for Peace" — suggests that conflict is already under way. Is greater confrontation and perhaps even war inevitable in the coming years?
It's not inevitable, but peace cannot be taken for granted. The scope for these two countries to develop peacefully and fulfill their national interests without entering into competition is getting smaller due to internal social pressures and rising nationalism. I am not arguing that they don't want to develop peacefully, but that the options for doing so are not that great. They'll be competing at all levels, not only for economic opportunities, but for regional influence. This will lead to an uncomfortable and risky situation. (See photos of Chinese workers.)

The last war fought between India and China was almost 50 years ago. How much of a strain is its legacy?

Ever since the 1962 war, both sides have been extremely cautious and suspicious of each other. There has been no resolution to the border issue [over remote, heavily militarized territories in the Himalayas] in spite of numerous rounds of negotiations and tensions that have flared recently. It's a kind of historic scar that impedes progress.

And this traditional sticking point is now compounded by a newer contest.
Yes, we see now that both sides' economic aspirations are leading to more competition, especially in Asia, and this is slowly spilling over in a negative way into the realm of high politics of security and diplomacy.

India still has to start the industrialization of its society — a process that China began well before. Inevitably, there will be a fierce contest for raw materials, mainly in Asia. We see this already happening in Burma, in parts of Central Asia, Africa and elsewhere. This is only going to become fiercer. It's also a myth that somehow the two economies, with their different strengths, will be able to complement each other in the long term. India has to turn to manufacturing and China is not going to give up suddenly its own industries. They're too important for the country's stability. (See photos of China's 60th anniversary.)

In India, there's already a widespread wariness in the media and the public domain of China's designs for the region. Is there a similar nationalist feeling in China, which in many ways is far more developed and capable than India?
Yes, you can clearly see that Beijing officials are increasingly worried about India's ambitions. If you look at the writings of Chinese experts, they refer to Indian military posturing in the Indian Ocean and also to military partnerships India is developing with several countries in Southeast Asia and East Africa. In the public realm, Chinese Netizens' views of India are very negative. You get the sense the Chinese never seemed to expect India to climb up to the ranks of the great powers. Now, as India attempts to make that leap, the Chinese are very worried of its impact on China's primacy in Asia. (Comment on this story.)

Hypothetically, how could some sort of military clash come about?
It wouldn't first be open war. China and India are building up their interests in conflict-prone and unstable states on their borders like Nepal and Burma — important sources of natural resources. If something goes wrong in these countries — if the politics implode — you could see the emergence of proxy wars in Asia. Distrust between India and China will grow and so too security concerns in a number of arenas. It's an important scenario that strategic planners in both Beijing and Delhi are looking at. (See TIME's India covers.)

What role is there for the U.S. to play in this context?

Since the U.S. has prioritized stabilizing Afghanistan over everything else in Asia, it has lost a lot of credit in both Delhi and Beijing. It is increasingly reliant on China, but has also undertaken security exercises [under the Bush Administration] that tried to work together with democratic countries like Japan, India and Australia at the exclusion of China. This fed into the traditional political claustrophobia many in China have — a sense that, in the end, Asia will be a very hostile environment for their development and geopolitical rise.

At the same time, India won't let itself be drowned in America's orbit. It's important for India to have its strategic independence. It has a very long and historically close relationship with Russia, which in turn is close to China. So it's a little more complicated. I don't think the Americans have thought very strategically about all of this.

How much of the trouble between India and China stems from the accident of geography — that they exist side by side in a very volatile part of the world?
The tragedy of continental states is that they have ever shifting spheres of influence that constantly create friction. Geographic proximity has always been one of the main factors in conflicts between great powers on the Eurasian landmass. Neither country can hide away from the other: a kind of increase of influence of one country in a border state is automatically perceived by the other as a loss in its own leverage. It creates a sense of a zero-sum game, which will be a hugely important and defining element in this relationship going forward.

Read more: China-India Competition: Is a Military Clash Inevitable? - TIME
 
. .
another western white trying to provoke india-china hatred.

im starting to wonder if the times of india are owned by americans and flooding the media with anti-china news.


so who is making provocative comments?? Your hatred has made you so blind that you cant make difference between Time and Time of india..
 
.
No we are going to wake up tommorrow and will go for war and chinese soldiers are coming with the trains ordered for Mumbai.

Damn it no one is going for a war because we do not have reasons for it. why to fight without a reason.
 
.
Adwitiya I cannot agree more, sometimes the journalists write articles for the purpose of grabbing headlines and raising some eyebrows.

If TIMES posted an article that said China and India will boost trades to $xxx billions a year then it would be nothing new or plain boring, many people don't even want to hear it for whatever self-insecure reasons, but if they write a headline that says "India and China prepares for War" and dig up the same old stories from the past 6 decades, then bang your article gets some "thought-provoking" attentions.

Cheap irresponsible journalism at work.
 
.
TIME used to have high standards. But now it is mainly pro-obama.

I love non politicizing magazines like National Geographic
 
.
Since when the ******* journalists are responsible for their ****?

It's all business. Nobody in the West gives a **** to India and China.

Hey if there is war who is going to benefit? The Russians and the US. What weapon would you like to buy? How about TU-95MS for $500 millions? Or how about B-2?
 
.
This is a BS thread. There is never going to be any conflict!! The thread starter is a common troll hoping for a flame war!!
The article writer is some unknown person, with no credibility.
I hope mods close this thread.
 
.
NatGeo is great, the Economists is pretty good too, some in depth analysis that's largely impartial which is quite hard to come by, the editors know their readership is international and they don't try to sway their readers to any political view.
 
.
Well China is worried by Indian ambitions to steal its land , and also terrorize other countries so it has to defend its friends and also its national interest .....

War if it happens will happen , I mean if we look at the Indian Army general's comments

Reference:
The Sentinel

As 2009 was coming to an end, Chief of the Army Staff General Deepak Kapoor indicated that India was revising its five-year-old military doctrine to maximize its military options in the Indian subcontinent and to reflect the reconfiguration of threat perceptions and security challenges. The two-front war strategy that was being deliberated was on simultaneously targeting China and Pakistan if a war happens. While revealing this he also outlined a few key elements of the doctrine. The announcement followed the November statement by General Kapoor about the likelihood of a limited war “under a nuclear overhang” in the subcontinent.


India is just inviting war on itself , we can only try to resolve the request :pakistan::china:
 
.
India is busy building missile that can penetrate deep into China and building a navy to counter that of China. Giving political and financial support to Dalai Lama by India is also getting involved in China's internal affairs. India is playing the China card to buy all advanced weapons from the US and Western Countries.
 
.
so who is making provocative comments?? Your hatred has made you so blind that you cant make difference between Time and Time of india..

times of the US is even worse. i'm just saying the Times of India is a very provokative paper, but TIME of the US is also useless and openly hateful of non-slave nations.
 
.
The oint to note is that not China , and even Pakistan have a doctrine of war with India , they all want peace.

Pakistan keeps asking for 1948 resolution to be implemented

But India's stance is just same , creating doctrines of war and purchasing 200 billion dollar worth of weapons ...

when the solutions are easier by debate and peaceful discussions
 
.
The oint to note is that not China , and even Pakistan have a doctrine of war with India , they all want peace.

Pakistan keeps asking for 1948 resolution to be implemented

But India's stance is just same , creating doctrines of war and purchasing 200 billion dollar worth of weapons ...

when the solutions are easier by debate and peaceful discussions

Its not working AZAD,stop your stupid divide and rule game.
 
.
Well China is worried by Indian ambitions to steal its land , and also terrorize other countries so it has to defend its friends and also its national interest .....

Meaningless generalizations. China doesn't have to do anything but protect its own national interests, as every responsible country does in the world. China isn't interested in 'defending' its friends (i.e Pakistan) it is interested in selling them weapons and locking potential rivals in conflicts. Let's not even get into terrorism, Pakistan has enough of that under its belt already.

War if it happens will happen , I mean if we look at the Indian Army general's comments...


Reference:
The Sentinel

As 2009 was coming to an end, Chief of the Army Staff General Deepak Kapoor indicated that India was revising its five-year-old military doctrine to maximize its military options in the Indian subcontinent and to reflect the reconfiguration of threat perceptions and security challenges. The two-front war strategy that was being deliberated was on simultaneously targeting China and Pakistan if a war happens. While revealing this he also outlined a few key elements of the doctrine. The announcement followed the November statement by General Kapoor about the likelihood of a limited war “under a nuclear overhang” in the subcontinent.

Yeah, what about his comments? His job is to plan for any eventuality, so that's what he's doing. He never said anything about initiating war.

India is just inviting war on itself , we can only try to resolve the request :pakistan::china:

Actually, it is Pakistan that is inviting a war on itself. As long as Pakistani 'non state actors' operate with impunity, Pakistan runs the risk of military retaliation.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom