What's new

The Beleaguered Indian Soldier's Lost Combat Edge

Zarvan

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Apr 28, 2011
Messages
54,470
Reaction score
87
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
By Pradip R Sagar

Published: 19th Jul 2015 07:33:40 AM

NEW DELHI:The Pakistani Army hasn’t got any less aggressive, violatiece
ceasefire agreements and helping terrorists infiltrate the Indian border into Kashmir, but the top brass of the Indian Army seems more obsessed with foreign tours and backing the white horse Defence Research Development Organisation (DRDO) as the search for creating the perfect soldier continues. Sci-fi versions of an infantryman equipped with cutting-edge hi-tech weaponry and armour in the Terminator fashion has been on the army’s wish list for over a decade. However, its ambitious project of a ‘Smart Soldier’ has not materialised even after 10 years of its announcement.

Pakistani ministers are threatening to nuke India and its Rangers keep pounding border areas with mortar, but miles-long red tape carpeting the corridors of South Block has been constantly tripping up the key project, despite steadily escalating security threats from Pakistan and China. Meanwhile, taxpayers’ money is being spent on research ‘junkets’ and wasteful projects by DRDO. Nearly 4,000 Indian soldiers have been killed in the country after the Kargil operations in 1999, which alone claimed the lives of over 500 soldiers in savage, World War-I style of infantry attacks. The total number of army deaths since the first war with Pakistan is nearly 8,000, including 6,000 deaths counter-terrorism operations in Jammu and Kashmir.

To reduce casualties drastically, the army decided to ape the western world’s soldier modernisation programme. It conceived an ambitious project called 'Future Infantry Soldiers As A System' (F-INSAS) in 2005. It was announced with much fanfare by the then chief of army staff General J J Singh in 2007. Its prototype was aimed at providing the infantry soldier with lethality, mobility, survivability, sustainability, communications and situational awareness. The estimated budget of Rs 25,000 crore was earmarked for its first phase. But tenders were falling apart, and DRDO’s notorious performance and delivery record ensured that even rifles could not be given to jawans soon.

Though F-INSAS was primarily to be developed through a military-DRDO-indigenous industry partnership, senior officers like Gen JJ Singh along with other top officials of the Infantry Directorate visited countries like the US, Israel and France to assess foreign world’s respective soldier modernisation programmes during its planning stage. Subsequently, officials have been making foreign visits to study available weapons in the world for the required category and they enjoyed these trips at the expense of the national exchequer.

Fundamentally, the F-INSAS programme involves equipping over 305,000 infantry troops (359 battalions) and around 90,000 Rashtriya Rifles and Assam Rifles soldiers deployed on conventional, counter-insurgency operations or both with a modular, multi-caliber suite of weapons and body armour. It has over 50 items, which are required to be procured or developed indigenously.

Initially, the project, which was divided under four category, i.e. Weapons, Night sight, Equipment and Communication, was working under an independent unit in the Infantry Directorate. But, presently, the independent unit of F-INSAS was dismantled and clubbed under the infantry directorate since 2014.

Though the Infantry Directorate claims to have all items at various stages of procurement, it appears to be ‘unrealistic’ in near future, according to a senior officer of the army headquarters.

Sources indicated the army itself is primarily responsible for the delays as it is unable to formulate the basic qualitative requirements for many of the planned weapons.

“In many cases, the qualitative requirement has not even prepared. And in some cases, it has been made unrealistic. Like the primary assault rifle case, invited bidders failed to meet the requirements asked by the army, which resulted its cancellation after four years of deliberations,” said a defence ministry official.

“F-INSAS programme is long overdue and needs to be fast-forwarded as security threats posed by nuclear rivals Pakistan and China are steadily escalating,” the officer further said.

And to make matter worse, a fortnight back, Indian army cancelled its four-year-old hunt for the primary assault rifle after the rifles produced by the foreign vendors were found to be unsatisfactory and expensive. The army has been battling to replace its two-decade -old indigenous INSAS rifles, which has been a ‘disappointment’. It proposed to buy 66,000 5.56mm assault rifles to replace INSAS. The service has used the INSAS 5.56mm assault rifle since the 1990s despite complaints of technical faltering. Army and para-military forces have even complained that the 5.56mm rounds were of inferior quality, causing the weapons to misfire.

In 2011, the global tender for interchangeable double barrel rifle with a 5.56 primary barrel for anti-terrorist operations and 7.62mm secondary barrel for fighting a conventional war was floated. Colt (US), Beretta (Italy), Ceska (Czech Republic), Israeli Weapon Industry and Sig Sauer (Europe) responded.

“Now, the global tender has been cancelled as all competitors failed to clear trials, army is considering an option of procuring it through ‘make in India’ policy,” an officer said.

In the coming years, Indian infantry soldiers will progressively get equipment like light-weight integrated ballistic helmets with “heads-up display” and miniaturised communication systems; portable visual, chemical and biological sensors; hand-held computer displays, GPS and video links; “smart” vests with sensors to monitor vital body signs; and of course lethal firepower with laser-guided modular weapon systems.

A senior army officer blamed the defence ministry for preferring DRDO to design weapon systems and the wasteful Ordnance Factory Board and defence PSUs to produce them. “With the pace of DRDO and deliverable experience of state PSU and Ordnance Factory Boards, the project was bound to be delayed. And ongoing tussle in the MoD between the private and public players majorly responsible for the failure of the future soldier programme,”an officer said.



soldier.JPG


The Beleaguered Indian Soldier's Lost Combat Edge -The New Indian Express
@Horus @nair @Dazzler @RescueRanger @SpArK @AUSTERLITZ @GURU DUTT @Slav Defence @Skull and Bones @doppelganger @SarthakGanguly
 
. . .
By Pradip R Sagar

Published: 19th Jul 2015 07:33:40 AM

NEW DELHI:The Pakistani Army hasn’t got any less aggressive, violatiece
ceasefire agreements and helping terrorists infiltrate the Indian border into Kashmir, but the top brass of the Indian Army seems more obsessed with foreign tours and backing the white horse Defence Research Development Organisation (DRDO) as the search for creating the perfect soldier continues. Sci-fi versions of an infantryman equipped with cutting-edge hi-tech weaponry and armour in the Terminator fashion has been on the army’s wish list for over a decade. However, its ambitious project of a ‘Smart Soldier’ has not materialised even after 10 years of its announcement.

Pakistani ministers are threatening to nuke India and its Rangers keep pounding border areas with mortar, but miles-long red tape carpeting the corridors of South Block has been constantly tripping up the key project, despite steadily escalating security threats from Pakistan and China. Meanwhile, taxpayers’ money is being spent on research ‘junkets’ and wasteful projects by DRDO. Nearly 4,000 Indian soldiers have been killed in the country after the Kargil operations in 1999, which alone claimed the lives of over 500 soldiers in savage, World War-I style of infantry attacks. The total number of army deaths since the first war with Pakistan is nearly 8,000, including 6,000 deaths counter-terrorism operations in Jammu and Kashmir.

To reduce casualties drastically, the army decided to ape the western world’s soldier modernisation programme. It conceived an ambitious project called 'Future Infantry Soldiers As A System' (F-INSAS) in 2005. It was announced with much fanfare by the then chief of army staff General J J Singh in 2007. Its prototype was aimed at providing the infantry soldier with lethality, mobility, survivability, sustainability, communications and situational awareness. The estimated budget of Rs 25,000 crore was earmarked for its first phase. But tenders were falling apart, and DRDO’s notorious performance and delivery record ensured that even rifles could not be given to jawans soon.

Though F-INSAS was primarily to be developed through a military-DRDO-indigenous industry partnership, senior officers like Gen JJ Singh along with other top officials of the Infantry Directorate visited countries like the US, Israel and France to assess foreign world’s respective soldier modernisation programmes during its planning stage. Subsequently, officials have been making foreign visits to study available weapons in the world for the required category and they enjoyed these trips at the expense of the national exchequer.

Fundamentally, the F-INSAS programme involves equipping over 305,000 infantry troops (359 battalions) and around 90,000 Rashtriya Rifles and Assam Rifles soldiers deployed on conventional, counter-insurgency operations or both with a modular, multi-caliber suite of weapons and body armour. It has over 50 items, which are required to be procured or developed indigenously.

Initially, the project, which was divided under four category, i.e. Weapons, Night sight, Equipment and Communication, was working under an independent unit in the Infantry Directorate. But, presently, the independent unit of F-INSAS was dismantled and clubbed under the infantry directorate since 2014.

Though the Infantry Directorate claims to have all items at various stages of procurement, it appears to be ‘unrealistic’ in near future, according to a senior officer of the army headquarters.

Sources indicated the army itself is primarily responsible for the delays as it is unable to formulate the basic qualitative requirements for many of the planned weapons.

“In many cases, the qualitative requirement has not even prepared. And in some cases, it has been made unrealistic. Like the primary assault rifle case, invited bidders failed to meet the requirements asked by the army, which resulted its cancellation after four years of deliberations,” said a defence ministry official.

“F-INSAS programme is long overdue and needs to be fast-forwarded as security threats posed by nuclear rivals Pakistan and China are steadily escalating,” the officer further said.

And to make matter worse, a fortnight back, Indian army cancelled its four-year-old hunt for the primary assault rifle after the rifles produced by the foreign vendors were found to be unsatisfactory and expensive. The army has been battling to replace its two-decade -old indigenous INSAS rifles, which has been a ‘disappointment’. It proposed to buy 66,000 5.56mm assault rifles to replace INSAS. The service has used the INSAS 5.56mm assault rifle since the 1990s despite complaints of technical faltering. Army and para-military forces have even complained that the 5.56mm rounds were of inferior quality, causing the weapons to misfire.

In 2011, the global tender for interchangeable double barrel rifle with a 5.56 primary barrel for anti-terrorist operations and 7.62mm secondary barrel for fighting a conventional war was floated. Colt (US), Beretta (Italy), Ceska (Czech Republic), Israeli Weapon Industry and Sig Sauer (Europe) responded.

“Now, the global tender has been cancelled as all competitors failed to clear trials, army is considering an option of procuring it through ‘make in India’ policy,” an officer said.

In the coming years, Indian infantry soldiers will progressively get equipment like light-weight integrated ballistic helmets with “heads-up display” and miniaturised communication systems; portable visual, chemical and biological sensors; hand-held computer displays, GPS and video links; “smart” vests with sensors to monitor vital body signs; and of course lethal firepower with laser-guided modular weapon systems.

A senior army officer blamed the defence ministry for preferring DRDO to design weapon systems and the wasteful Ordnance Factory Board and defence PSUs to produce them. “With the pace of DRDO and deliverable experience of state PSU and Ordnance Factory Boards, the project was bound to be delayed. And ongoing tussle in the MoD between the private and public players majorly responsible for the failure of the future soldier programme,”an officer said.



soldier.JPG


The Beleaguered Indian Soldier's Lost Combat Edge -The New Indian Express
@Horus @nair @Dazzler @RescueRanger @SpArK @AUSTERLITZ @GURU DUTT @Slav Defence @Skull and Bones @doppelganger @SarthakGanguly
@Zarvan bhai rehem mujhe pata chal gaya hai ki apko "ELITE MEMEBER"banne ke baad india aur indian defnce ki kuch jyada hi chinta hone lag parri hai ....per ab bas kardo bhai aur saha nahi jata ye atyachar:sarcastic:

its a $hit article by yet another $hitti "defence ANAL yst" :haha:
 
.
20 kg BPJ and INSAS rifle? :lol: Which defense "analyst" makes this crap? :hitwall:
Picture is wrong but is right on issues.
1: INSAS is not doing good
2: Lack of BP Jackets
3: Shoes also not good
 
.
Picture is wrong but is right on issues.
1: INSAS is not doing good
2: Lack of BP Jackets
3: Shoes also not good

1.) Its not a superb rifle but it does its job.

2.) Agreed

3.) Agreed

4.) Modern helmets, camo, joint protection etc are also missing
 
.
Picture is wrong but is right on issues.
1: INSAS is not doing good
2: Lack of BP Jackets
3: Shoes also not good
but question is why are you so botherred about it or have you decided to fund F-INSAS programme :azn:

dont worry we are already working on it rather you should be happy with this condition as the writer of the article is trying to potray ... isnt it ?
 
.
but question is why are you so botherred about it or have you decided to fund F-INSAS programme :azn:

dont worry we are already working on it rather you should be happy with this condition as the writer of the article is trying to potray ... isnt it ?
I like the enemy which is well equipped.
 
. . .
I'm not it makes them better also better motivated and determined to stand up and fight.
well in 1971 & kargil they were even more weaker than now still we all know the history ... dont we :azn: :sarcastic:
 
. . . .
Picture is wrong but is right on issues.
1: INSAS is not doing good
2: Lack of BP Jackets
3: Shoes also not good

INSAS is a fairly good weapon. But it was designed for conventional warfare which is now not the case. Hence the need for it's replacement. On a firing range, I will take an INSAS any day. Its fire is accurate in both single and burst mode. So sorry my friend, you are off on this topic.
As for BP jackets of BPJs, our BPJs are around 12 kgs and NOT 20 kgs as you are projecting. It is slightly lighter than the US vests which have all round body protection unlike ours. So I am not sure you are right on the mark here too.

As for shoes, we have pretty strudy and heavy shoes as per ordnance factory issue. But I have yet to see any soldier wear the same for actual field deployment. They all use lightweight shoes which are adept for both mountain and desert warfare.

So sorry but you are way off.

1.) Its not a superb rifle but it does its job.

2.) Agreed

3.) Agreed

4.) Modern helmets, camo, joint protection etc are also missing

About INSAS, disagreed

Point 2: It is as per scale. Only problem is lack of individual responsibility ensures that the life cycle costs are high as no one maintains them (our soldiers are notorious at it)

Point 3 redundant. Light weight shoes are being used by our soldiers albeit personal procurement.

Poitn 4: Under process already for sometime. Digital Synthetic pattern has come in ... reduces the signature for TI/IR imaging devices hence enhancing camouflage tremendously.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom