Like i said my village is close to KOHAT....and no there are no taliban in KOHAT,DIR or any place like that....well reading news is media and i am sorry media feeds on SCARING PEOPLE.....
Okay so the medias reports arent correct if you insist. Then why is the FC deployed there? The paramilitary forces (Rangers/Frontier Corps) are only brought in when the provincial police is unable to maintain law and order. So what might be the factor that hinders maintenance of peace any guesses? Id say the Taliban.
UNDER TALIBAN PEACE WAS VERY PREVAILENT....THIS EVEN THE AMERICANS CANNOT DENY.....so unless and until god forbid KARACHI,LAHORE,ISLAMABAD become ghettos TALIBAN cannot come and "RESCUE" the poor people and promise them peace in return for SHARIAH
Okay so you are pro-Taliban rule and I am not you are entitled to your opinion as I am to mine. I consider their practices barbaric.
Do you know that most of the Taliban in Frontier districts are actually locals only, who have been brainwashed by their leaders. So it wont take ghettoisation of Khi, Lhr and Isl for a Taliban take-over its a mind game.
Balochistan is a problem that needs attention now leave the Taliban...you honestly think taliban can walk over to your or my house and convince us to support them...
Not convince us probably but their presence in southern Punjab in terms of people subscribing to their views is formidable. Plus with the migration of the IDPs from Swat and other areas affected by violence, Taliban have also made in-roads into the city.
no way will i suport their BRAND OF SHARIAH....and i think it is obvious from the time of the NIZAM-E-ADAL how less the sucide bombings have become...so taliban are not that bad....
Probably because they were the ones who were blowing themselves up. Now that they have forced the government to comply, it makes little sense to go after hoors.
Read the whole thing before quoting:
TNSM has no intention to set up a state within state (the heading refers to how they don't want to set up parallel system of justice they only want one as the spokesman says later)
SWAT: Tehrik Nifaz Shariat-e-Muhammadi (TNSM) spokesman Amir Izzat Khan has said that the Constitution of Pakistan is very much Islamic but steps are not being taken strictly according to its provisions.
TNSM has no intention to set up a state within state
. on the contrary, we want to give Pakistans Ideology a practical shape, Izzat Khan said while talking to media after the holding of talks between NWFP government and TNSM leaders on the situation emerged in the wake of implementation of Nizam-e-adl Regulation in Malakand Division.
TNSM spokesman said: We want to keep the Swat peace deal intact at all cost. However, he said the deadline given for establishment of Qazi courts and also Dar-ul-Qaza has not been withdrawn.
Any guesses on what the "practical shape" is?