Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think the Abbasid era was the best. Because during the Abbasid era and even the late Ummayud period, the Islamic world was much better economically and also in terms of science and innovation. Also the Abbasid Caliphate was a stable Caliphate which did not suffer much conflict.No the modern day VIP culture could never have been imagined in Rashidun and Umayad Caliphate. They were more of welfare states based on strict accountability and justice, even the Caliph couldn't escape the accountability.
The policy was to keep your doors open with no guards 24x7 for common people, the reason most of the Caliphs were easily target assassinated.
Abbasid era was the worst, the darkest times of Muslims' history.
On the other hand the Rashidun era was all about war, bloodshed and murder of Caliphs. There were no economic prosperity or scientific, medical, innovative advancement during the Rashidun era.
I think the Abbasid era was the best. Because during the Abbasid era and even the late Ummayud period, the Islamic world was much better economically and also in terms of science and innovation. Also the Abbasid Caliphate was a stable Caliphate which did not suffer much conflict.
Agreed. This size criterion is limited in terms of how meaningful it actually is because it doesn't take into account the quality of the opposition. Anyone with a few cannons and rifles would grab the whole of Australia and North America just by getting there first. Conversely, scrapping around the regions of the middle east, Europe, China and south Asia were hard work against often formidable opponents.yes but British Empire had 3 large countries, Australia, India and Canada
that alone counts for 70% of the total