What's new

The 25 largest empires in human history by land area

Kailash Kumar

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Oct 8, 2018
Messages
4,643
Reaction score
-1
Country
Suriname
Location
Netherlands
Largest Empires In Human History By Land Area

The sun is always shining, the old saying goes, in one or more territories of the vast British Empire. However, it is not the only empire to leave its mark on history - a mark that reaches every corner of the world.

Definitions of an empire vary widely. An empire could be made up of one state, multiple states, or groups of countries. Empires are formed from ethnic, cultural, national, and religious components. As such, determining which aspect to use to measure an empire is problematic. This is because the mentioned factors often overlap one another. However, the following largest Empires were determined following a methodology strictly based on total land area.

Naamloos.png


About the top 10

1. British Empire, 1497-1997, 13.71 million square miles
The British Empire was formed up of protectorates, colonies, dominions, mandates, and territories. By 1920s, at the height of its dominance, the whole empire covered more than 13 million square miles (24% of the earth’s area) which included territories in every continent. The self-governing nations of the Union of South Africa, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and other colonies such as Kenya, Nigeria, India, Egypt, Sudan, Burma, and Singapore were all ruled from London. The British naval power controlled most of the key maritime trade routes and enjoyed unchallenged sea power. It also controlled many access routes to Asia and Latin America

2. Mongol Empire, 1206-1368, 9.27 million square miles
By the 1280s the Mongol Empire was the largest contiguous empire in the history of humankind covering an area of 9.27 million square miles. The empire covered the steppes of Central Asia, then stretched to the Sea of Japan, Central Europe, then finally westwards to Levant and Arabia. It extended northwards to Siberia, and southwards and eastwards to Indochina, Iranian Plateau, and the Indian subcontinent. The Mongol Empire started as groups of nomadic tribes united by Genghis Khan in 1206.

shutterstock-170301368.jpg

A monument of Genghis Khan in Mongolia. Khan led the vast Mongol Empire.

3. Russian Empire, 1721-1917, 8.8 million square miles
The Russia Empire was made up of Moscow, St. Petersburg, Russian Poland, the central European Russian regions, the Baltic cities, regions along lower Dnepr and Don rivers and the Southern Ural Mountains, covering an area of 8.8 million square miles. In 1861, the law allowed peasants to own the lands they were working on for their use, thus freeing them from their dependency on landowners. The farmers constituted four-fifths of the rural population, and the proclamation made Russia the largest cereal producer and exporter in the world.

4. Qing Dynasty, 1644-1917, 5.68 million square miles
The Qing Dynasty was the last imperial rule in China. Under the leadership of Kangxi Emperor, the Empire was a world power thanks to its social, economic, and political means. At the time of the eighteenth century, the Qing Empire administered over 5 million square miles. Yongzheng converted Qing to an early modern state promoting Confucian orthodoxy and banning Christianity in 1723.

5. Spanish Empire, 1492-1975, 5.29 million square miles
The Spanish Empire was composed of colonies and territories of the Spanish Monarch distributed throughout the Americas, Asia, Africa, Oceania, the Greater Antilles, South America, and some Pacific Ocean Archipelagos such as the Philippines. The Spanish empire dominated the oceans and European battles, as it was able to partake in trade in the Atlantic, Indian and Pacific sea. Despite its size, the Empire was in constant fights with powers over territories, trade, or religion.

6. Second French Empire, 1534-1980, 4.44 million square miles
France underwent tremendous growth and development between the First and Second World Wars. In the early 1920s, French defeated Germany in the First World War with the help of the Allied powers. By 1924, means of agricultural and industrial production had developed extensively. The Great Depression hit France in 1931. After 1931, high levels of unemployment and political unrest became a national problem. The French Empire, which had once extended from Europe to Africa to North America to Asia, began to decolonize in the mid 20th century.

7. Umayyad Caliphate, 651-750, 4.29 million square miles
The Umayyad Caliphate stretched from Syria, Damascus, Maghreb, Iberian Peninsula, Sindh, Punjab, Transoxiana, and the Caucasus. All these territories had a combined population of 62 million people (which was 29% of the world’s population) and covered an area of 4.29 million square miles.

8. Abbasid Caliphate, 9th Century CE, 4.29 million square miles
Abbasid was part of the vast and powerful Arab Empire. In 750 AD, Abbasid overthrew the Umayyad caliphate (a caliphate is a region under the command of a Muslim ruler). It covered parts of what would be recognized today as the Middle East, Central Asia, Southern Europe, and Northern Africa. The empire takes its name from Abbas ibn Abd al-Muttalib, who was the youngest uncle of the prophet Muhammad.

9. Yuan Empire, 1271-1368, 4.25 million square miles
The Yuan Empire, established by Kublai Khan Clan, succeeded the Mongol Empire to become an imperial Chinese dynasty. It covered an area of 4.2 million square miles. The Pax Mongolica system promoted commercial, cultural, and scientific growth. In this era, Yuan was at peace with the Khanates of Western Mongolia.

10. Portuguese Empire, Early 19th Century, 4.02 million square miles
By 1815, the Portuguese Empire was four million square miles. It covered the regions known today as Brazil, Mozambique, Zambia, and Zimbabwe, as well as other regions in Africa. It is notable for being one of the first empires in history to cover such great lengths. Throughout the 20th century, pieces of the empire began to gain independence. It was officially dissolved when Portugal gave Macau to China in 1999.


https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/largest-empires-in-human-history-by-land-area.html
 
. .
not at all a fair list.. how can you for example compare Achaemenid empire of 500BC with british empire of 1920? \

the new worlds were undiscovered back then and not really counted as part of the world...

on a side note though. isn't it a bit of karma that white Britain will go extinct in history.

they were the first to reach the industrial age. and they used that power to enslave, steal from, and loot any corner of the earth they could. and a parting getsture, leave behind territorial disputes when you exit. that create endless conflicts and wars that claim thousands of lives a year to this day...

the british empire is the most evil entity in human history. the fact that not only their empire is lost, but the "british people" are being bred out of existence is something history will laugh at. people in the 19th and 20th century were enlightened enough to know EXACTLY what they were doing.

that british queen still shamelessly holds on to stolen jewelry
 
.
not at all a fair list.. how can you for example compare Achaemenid empire of 500BC with british empire of 1920? \

the new worlds were undiscovered back then and not really counted as part of the world...

on a side note though. isn't it a bit of karma that white Britain will go extinct in history.

they were the first to reach the industrial age. and they used that power to enslave, steal from, and loot any corner of the earth they could. and a parting getsture, leave behind territorial disputes when you exit. that create endless conflicts and wars that claim thousands of lives a year to this day...

the british empire is the most evil entity in human history. the fact that not only their empire is lost, but the "british people" are being bred out of existence is something history will laugh at. people in the 19th and 20th century were enlightened enough to know EXACTLY what they were doing.

that british queen still shamelessly holds on to stolen jewelry

Empires are empires their goal is to conquer and dominate.

But I do agree you cant compare different empires from different eras due to many factors.

Also Traditional Empires are different from Colonial Empires.

This list is basically about the biggest empires in land mass which I find stupid really.
 
.
Essentially, three institutions developed in Britain at separate times in its history due to its geographical location, and its economic system and social structures. The three institutions are the state (represented by the monarch), the rule of law, and political accountability. The Catholic Church represented a transnational doctrinal and transcendental religion that was viewed as legitimate by Catholics (i.e. everybody) until the Protestant Reformation. In the twelfth century, the Investiture Conflict occurred because of Pope Gregory I, when he successfully fought the Holy Roman Emperor and his allies for the ability to appoint his own officials within the Church. Around that time, an old legal tome called the Corpus Juris Civilus (published originally by the Eastern Roman Emperor Justinian I) was discovered in an old library. To make a long story short, the Church developed a system of codified rules and informal norms that were seen as legitimate by political elites and peasants alike. Furthermore, the discovery of the Roman "Body of Civil Law" led to the institutionalization of a transnational legal system that influenced British Common Law.

Most people also think that the celibacy of the priesthood is doctrinal in origin, but in fact the Catholic Church mandated it to prevent its priests from passing their office and its benefits onto their children. This allowed the Pope to reform the Church as a bureaucracy overtime, and though not perfect, prevented much nepotism from ossifying it. His goal was to make administration more efficient, and as the Church developed its institutional autonomy and capacity, the Pope could bestow on monarchs divine legitimacy that they could not obtain through mere birth into an aristocratic class. The Church then acted in a both cooperative and conflictual manner, resisting and cooperating with secular authorities where needed. Combined with the development of Common Law (judge-made law) in Britain, which is its own separate story, the "rule of law" emerged. This religious law was viewed as superior to secular law, where all Catholics in Christendom were considered "equal under God" and eventually the concept was secularized into something like "equality under the law". The rule of law developed first in Britain, and with the the Glorious Revolution of 1688 and social contract theorists like John Locke, the British state institutionalized political accountability separate and apart from the legitimating force of religious authority. The Queen is today a paid civil servant and always approves Royal Assent to Parliament's legislation because the Parliament, which has been effectively democratized through the House of Commons, is her legitimating force. Nowhere else in Europe did the conflict between Parliament and King result in a sovereign Parliament with the ability to raise an army, tax a population uniformly and prevent the piecemeal sale of the state to private oligarchs [this happened in Ancient Regime France and in Spain]. Political accountability secularized, as I said, in the form of democracy in the mid-nineteenth and twentieth centuries; from religious authority to popular authority. The British modernized faster than their potential rivals across the Continent and the world, and consequently, had the autonomy and capacity to build and maintain an Empire “upon which the sun never set."
 
.
Rashidun Caliphate peaked in 1450? Ali (ra) died in 661?
 
.
Rashidun Caliphate peaked in 1450? Ali (ra) died in 661?
Can you tell me does modern day VIP culture exists in a Caliphate? In India, Bangladesh, Pakistan and elsewhere President, PMs and Member of parliament are VIPs who live like millionaires with bodyguards around them. Are Caliphs like them or do they lead more simpler lives?

@Pan-Islamic-Pakistan @waz @Imran Khan

Not a religious question but you can answer too.
 
. .
.
Can you tell me does modern day VIP culture exists in a Caliphate? In India, Bangladesh, Pakistan and elsewhere President, PMs and Member of parliament are VIPs who live like millionaires with bodyguards around them. Are Caliphs like them or do they lead more simpler lives?

@Pan-Islamic-Pakistan @waz @Imran Khan

Not a religious question but you can answer too.

The true form of Islamic Caliphate was the Rashidun caliphate. Rashidun during the time of Abu Bakr Siddique (RA) and Umar Bin Khattab (RA) was one of the best states a human can desire, the empire was ruled with justice.

All Caliphates after the Rashidun were basically hereditary monarchies with only a banner of the Caliphate. They were worse, far worse than present day India, Bangladesh, Pakistan; they were worse than the Saudi state.

When Muslims talk about the Caliphate (Khilafah) they actually mean the Rashidun.
 
.
The true form of Islamic Caliphate was the Rashidun caliphate. Rashidun during the time of Abu Bakr Siddique (RA) and Umar Bin Khattab (RA) was one of the best states a human can desire, the empire was ruled with justice.

All Caliphates after the Rashidun were basically hereditary monarchies with only a banner of the Caliphate. They were worse, far worse than present day India, Bangladesh, Pakistan; they were worse than the Saudi state.

When Muslims talk about the Caliphate (Khilafah) they actually mean the Rashidun.
Yes but I was asking a different question. The thing is if you look at modern nation states, President and Prime ministers and government ministers live a lavish lifestyle and gets VIP treatment everywhere including their children. Even the police and law enforcement are scared of them.

Do Caliphs as the head of state live like this?
 
.
Yes but I was asking a different question. The thing is if you look at modern nation states, President and Prime ministers and government ministers live a lavish lifestyle and gets VIP treatment everywhere including their children. Even the police and law enforcement are scared of them.

Do Caliphs as the head of state live like this?

I answered the question in my reply.

The answer is, in a true Caliphate they don't. The Caliph, the generals, ministers, governors and such do not live a lavish lifestyle.

In a fake Caliphate (basically almost all of them after the Rashidun) they do, they were far far worse than BD, Pakistan, India or Saudi.

If you want you can read about the life of Umar Bin Khattab (RA) and find out yourself, be prepared to be amazed.
 
Last edited:
.
Can you tell me does modern day VIP culture exists in a Caliphate? In India, Bangladesh, Pakistan and elsewhere President, PMs and Member of parliament are VIPs who live like millionaires with bodyguards around them. Are Caliphs like them or do they lead more simpler lives?

@Pan-Islamic-Pakistan @waz @Imran Khan

Not a religious question but you can answer too.

No the modern day VIP culture could never have been imagined in Rashidun and Umayad Caliphate. They were more of welfare states based on strict accountability and justice, even the Caliph couldn't escape the accountability.

The policy was to keep your doors open with no guards 24x7 for common people, the reason most of the Caliphs were easily target assassinated.

Abbasid era was the worst, the darkest times of Muslims' history.
 
.
The true form of Islamic Caliphate was the Rashidun caliphate. Rashidun during the time of Abu Bakr Siddique (RA) and Umar Bin Khattab (RA) was one of the best states a human can desire, the empire was ruled with justice.

All Caliphates after the Rashidun were basically hereditary monarchies with only a banner of the Caliphate. They were worse, far worse than present day India, Bangladesh, Pakistan; they were worse than the Saudi state.

When Muslims talk about the Caliphate (Khilafah) they actually mean the Rashidun.

if you think rashidun caliphate was best state a human can desire you should read some serious neutral history books rather thn Islamiyat and Pak studies.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom