OrionHunter
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- May 28, 2011
- Messages
- 13,818
- Reaction score
- -5
- Country
- Location
So come and make in India!!If we allowed to bite a small piece of it?
To be honest, India market is luring.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So come and make in India!!If we allowed to bite a small piece of it?
To be honest, India market is luring.
Said China company win the bidding of some HSR in India, we wil make it safe and sound.
@Bang Galore
This is wrt to the thread where you stated that India has misplaced priorities. In reality billions ARE BEING invested peacefully as we raise a ruckus on other issues. Imagine the amount of noise the neo left would create over this investment alone.
Also inflation is getting lower, millions of bank accounts opened, Kashmir elections have been successful, new MoUs signed with anumber of countries, investments on the line from US, Australia, Russia, China, Germany.
Like I said - Sab apne apne kaam kar rahe hain.
First of all - 'dramatically' is a subjective term.You miss the point. The economic outlook has improved (because of the momentum of the Modi effect) but not dramatically, there is still no major policy changes that have been effected. We have had absolutely brilliant luck with oil prices but we can do so much more. I think focusing on the issues that create strife & maybe cause parliamentary logjam is poor politics let alone economics. I'm sorry you think that the kind of stuff that has been going on is the reality of " Sab apne apne kaam kar rahe hain", I can only say that I disagree with that approach.
You miss the point. The economic outlook has improved (because of the momentum of the Modi effect) but not dramatically, there is still no major policy changes that have been effected. We have had absolutely brilliant luck with oil prices but we can do so much more. I think focusing on the issues that create strife & maybe cause parliamentary logjam is poor politics let alone economics. I'm sorry you think that the kind of stuff that has been going on is the reality of " Sab apne apne kaam kar rahe hain", I can only say that I disagree with that approach.
What this Government has done 1 month ago is to the Defense sector of India what the Economic liberalization of 1991 was to India.It will have a very positive effect and drive both the quality and timeframe of R&D in the Indian Defence sector.
What this Government has done 1 month ago is to the Defense sector of India what the Economic liberalization of 1991 was to India.
The results will be visible in a decade from now.
You are right.Perhaps earlier, that is because the industry itself is geared more than it was in 1991 to take advantage of such regulatory changes.
First of all - 'dramatically' is a subjective term.
Secondly, major policy changes have already been done - from the planning comm to green licenses, defence, more divestment etc. Things are being done, quite rapidly actually. More reforms have been initiated in 6 months than we saw in past 6 years.
Third, there is always scope for further improvement. Even if you move a 1000 steps forward, there will still be a million miles left to go. For Budgetary reforms and changes we have to wait for the next budget, such is the limitation of parliamentary democracy. Ordinances can only go so far.
Fourth, your main issue is not the economic reforms which are progressing but what you call 'poor' politics.
If China enters into a agreement that it will not claim J&K and AP, we are more than ready to relinquish our claim on Aksai Chin. Only benefit was that we could connect both western China and Tibbet provinces of PRC for economic and trade benefits. But after war this seems so distant that I only dream about it. Connectivity that's what we look for. There is no cultural or religious difference between China and India as both country population practices dharmic religion as well as atheism apart from the sizable Abrahamic religion followers too. Both are still very much developing countries, one much better than other.Those land are barren. If the AP people wanna stay in India republic, let it be.
See? it's about politics. If it's the problem about you and me, problem solved. There still lots of resistence in domestic if both XI and Modi want to settle the problem dowm.
The other disputed unamed lands shall be cut in half to half. India keep Ap and CHina keep Aksai chin, both side save face.
Then time to talk JV.
What you say?
China can't kill India and contra versa, confrontaion only brings disaster to later generation. Why brave enough to solve it in our generation?
AP is a plain area, very tough for China to defend , that's the only reason why China gave it up in 1962. We better have Hymalaya in between.
The geology along the India and CHina border doom that there will be no large scale of land war breaking out.
If Dalai Lama is happy staying in India, let him be. Or he is ok to go back to China if he give up Tibet independance.
If we do insist those cross claim to the end, no one gains anything in the end. It's wasting time. It depends on both sides to let the guard down to talk. It tests whether Modi and Xi is brave enough to shoulder the responsibility.
The only purpose of 1962 conflict is not to grab lands from India, but to gave a solid lesson to Nehru's foward policy.
Well if gossips are to be believed then the GoI is going to increase the ceiling of private investment in defense sector to 74% very soon instead of the 49% that was suggested earlier.If this happens then we will see many International Defense giants like LM and Boeing coming to this country and starting JVs with their Indian counterparts.Perhaps earlier, that is because the industry itself is geared more than it was in 1991 to take advantage of such regulatory changes.
India emerges as world largest arms exporter? Did I miss something.
India emerges as world largest arms exporter? Did I miss something.
Typo.... Typo.... Typow. type-pow... tie-po... tie poww..