What's new

The 1962 in my eyes

YYYYYYYYY in the FREAKING WORLD U ARE OPENING THE OLD POSTS.......... IT WAS STARTED IN 2009
 
. .
sounds like you are ready to make India/China border the way it is now permanent. However, that is not the view of Indians. I think that most Indians wants to tear Tibet from China.


Not even remotely true.

Only a handful of Internet Hindus, in a moment of mental instability (that is, all the time) might say something which sounds like this.
 
.
Not even remotely true.

Only a handful of Internet Hindus, in a moment of mental instability (that is, all the time) might say something which sounds like this.

And some 50 cent party Chinese members also , who talk about taking AP from India or capturing the Andaman and Nicobar islands from us as well . They shouldn't be missed too .
 
.
sounds like you are ready to make India/China border the way it is now permanent. However, that is not the view of Indians. I think that most Indians wants to tear Tibet from China.

Most Indians don't want to tear anything from China . We just want to retain the territory we have and turn the LoAC into the international border ,however, your govt. has stalled the final settlement due to it rigidness on taking the Tawang tract .
 
.
And some 50 cent party Chinese members also , who talk about taking AP from India or capturing the Andaman and Nicobar islands from us as well . They shouldn't be missed too .


And some Chinese fanboys, too, who talk about taking AP from India or the Andaman and Nicobar Islands as their 'jewels'. Let us not miss them.

nick_indian, please don't use that term about Chinese members; you are inviting a ban or at least an infraction.
 
.
And some Chinese fanboys, too, who talk about taking AP from India or the Andaman and Nicobar Islands as their 'jewels'. Let us not miss them.

nick_indian, please don't use that term about Chinese members; you are inviting a ban or at least an infraction.

Why is the term "50 cent party" banned but not the term "internet hindus" ?
 
.
Really? 50 cents member invites a ban and you calling your fellow countrymen internet hindus sits right with you.
your sense of gratitude about this forum has overtaken your subjective assessment. what a pity.


1. The phrase used is banned by the forum, not by me.
2. It is generic, and is used about all Chinese members, not about those demonstrating offensive behaviour.
3. The term Internet Hindu is a term coined by another Indian, not by some foreigner mocking Indians.
4. It is used specifically about Indians demonstrating offensive behaviour.
5. When you are six posts old, you should not comment on the behaviour of those who have been members for more than three years now. You know nothing about whether or not I have a sense of gratitude for this forum, or otherwise, and will know nothing unless you survive.

Why is the term "50 cent party" banned but not the term "internet hindus" ?


Ask the moderators. My own opinion is given in a post already posted.
 
.
I come from China,I know nothing about the thing happened with India in 1962 until I entered university. in my eyes,it’s only a very very small thing during the past 50years ,I only knew that we had war with US in 1951,with Russia in 1969,with Vietnam in 1979,but now they are all past ,not to say 1962,I even forgot it.
In our eyes,the US is our competitor and “partner” but not india,the Chinese army and weapons is used to beat back the US army around china(1000km-1500km away from china).
Don’t talk about 1962,it is no meaning to china,it’s only a very very small thing to china,if India see china as an enemy then china will be an enemy ,if India see china as a friend then china will be a friend.
There are series of threads on Pdf from chinese members in past one week seems to pleasant talk of rapprochement etc. Its looks like chinese are unleashing their own version of "Aman ki Asha" on indians...good ..good........................:tup:
 
.
Not even remotely true.

Only a handful of Internet Hindus, in a moment of mental instability (that is, all the time) might say something which sounds like this.

Why dig the grave, take out a rotten corpse.
Already plenty of threads to fight on. Let the dead rest in peace.
 
.
Not only tear Tibet from China, but also annex Tibet with India. This is one of the objectives Indian have to realize their Akhand Bharat (greater India) dream.

phew ....yu have got hold of all of our secret dreams..:chilli:....please enlighten us more...our goverment has oppressed information about India's plan for Tibet ..... :cheesy:
 
.
Plus China gave India back all the captured Indian weapons just after the end of the war.


But what about Chinese POWs?


In 2003 two Chinese POWs had been released from an Indian jail, who had been captured in 1962 war and had remained in prison for more than 4 decades in jail!!!

Link below:


After 40 yrs in Ranchi, Chinese PoWs walk free




Racism by Indians was seen during and after 1962 war. Below is the evidence:

The Chinese also had to cope with local distrust after the border war between India and China in 1962. Nearly 350,000 Chinese lived in Calcutta before the 1962 conflict. Now there are less than 5,000, according to community members. For several years after the war, the Chinese found themselves treated with suspicion by the government, which severely restricted their movement.

Asia Times: Calcutta's Chinese near extinction

During the Sino-Indian conflict, the Chinese faced anti-national sentiment unleashed by the Indian National Congress-dominated government. Chinese businesses were investigated for links to the Chinese government and many people of Chinese origin were interned in prisons in North India.

Chinese community in Kolkata - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This was how the Indians treated the innocent Chinese businessmen. But what about Indians who were living in China during the same period?

Here an Indian family itself says the truth. Click below to see:

Up?Close 2009-09-20 60th Anniversary: Janaki Ballabhs family CCTV-International


Well, not to mention today many Indians live in Shanghai, Hong Kong, Beijing, Guangzhou etc in China and if now the Chinese start paying back.

:china: :china: :china:


Before Post just Read the Article

Just two lines from the article of Ranchi

‘They were freed,’’ confirmed Ranchi Deputy Commissioner Pradeep Kumar about the two who have been staying behind the high walls of this asylum since 1964.

In official records Siblong was identified as an ‘‘ex PLA soldier’’ at the time of his arrest somewhere in NEFA; Chialung, who reportedly identified himself as a ‘‘civilian’’, was picked up from around the same area after the 1962 war.


Indians don't believe on this posts. Indian government is always follow the Rules for POW. And nothing is wrong (ultimately its always wrong policy let the tit for tat)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
Back
Top Bottom