What's new

Thailand has an aircraft carrier with no aircraft

Carlosa

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2014
Messages
3,875
Reaction score
3
Country
Spain
Location
Viet Nam
Thailand has an aircraft carrier with no aircraft
JEREMY BENDER
FEB. 20, 2015

Thailand's aircraft carrier has no aircraft - Business Insider
  • chakri_naruebet_2001.jpeg
    US Navy/PH3 Alex C. Witte

For a brief period in the late 1990s, Thailand was the only country in southeast Asia that possessed one of the ultimate symbols of military strength: an aircraft carrier.

Its carrier, the HTMS Chakri Naruebet, was meant to be a point of pride for Thailand and symbolize the developing country's power.

Then the late 1990s Asian financial crisis hit Thailand. Bangkok's grand plans for its carrier were significantly hobbled. Commissioned in 1997, the same year the financial crisis struck the country, the Chakri Naruebet — which means "Sovereign of the Chakri dynasty," the Thai monarchy's ruling family — was mostly consigned to sitting in port due to lack of funding.

Now, according to The Motley Fool, Asia has plenty of aircraft carriers, as China, India, Japan, and South Korea all have carriers of different sizes. Not wanting to be left out, Singapore is on its way to constructing a carrier too.

All this competition has only made Thailand's once-proud carrier look like a bizarre reminder of the country's dysfunction, rather than the symbol of growing prestige that it was intended to be.

According to The Diplomat, Thailand's AV-8S Matador (Harrier) accompanying jet fleet was withdrawn from service in 2006, leaving Bangkok with an aircraft carrier without aircraft. Thailand experienced a military coup that same year, along with a second one in 2014.

Thailand ordered its aircraft carrier from Spain in 1992. The vessel was commissioned five years later, in 1997
ap9708100640.jpg
AP/PornchaiCrew members salute from Thailand's first aircraft carrier the HTMS Chakri Naruebet during an official ceremony to commission the Spanish-built ship at Sattahip Naval Base in Chon Buri, 70 kilometers (44 miles) south of Bangkok, Sunday, Aug. 10, 1997. The 182.6-meter-long vessel is capable of carrying nine Sea Harrier AV-8S jets and six SH-70B helicopters.

Almost immediately, Thailand ran into budget constraints. The Chakri Naruebet was put to port for the better part of each month and in 2006 its associated air wing was withdrawn. The Harriers are now over 30 years old.
chakri_naruebet_2001_stern_view.jpeg
PH3 Alex C. Witte/US Navy

Even while operational, the carrier has been outclassed by the larger vessels of India and China, not to mention the US's super carrier fleet pictured below. It's now the smallest functioning aircraft carrier in the world.
chakri_naruebet-kitty_hawk_size.jpeg
PH3 Alex C. Witte/US Navy

The Chakri Naruebet was built to carry 9 Harrier aircraft and 14 helicopters, with a 605-person crew. Some of those planes are decades old, and the carrier reportedly doesn't have a functioning anti-aircraft defense system.
ap9708100590.jpg
AP/Pornchai

Still, despite its shortcomings, the Chakri Naruebet has proved useful in humanitarian missions. The Diplomat notes that the carrier was used after the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami as well as in rescue operations after flooding in Thailand in 2010 and 2011
 
also, thailand has a submarine base without submarines.
but the thai should have money for subs and aircraft, considering their higher GDP than ours.
 
Thai knows well Navies are useless nowadays.
 
also, thailand has a submarine base without submarines.
but the thai should have money for subs and aircraft, considering their higher GDP than ours.

Not really, their defense budget is much lower than Vietnam and their economy is not doing well at the moment.

They will get some subs because the military is in power right now.
 
Thai knows well Navies are useless nowadays.

Philippines lost Scarborough Shoal because it only had one functional ship that could only stay on station for so long. Even if ships are not very useful during wartime, if you don't have them, you lose even more. If nothing else, you need them to show the flag.
 
The carrier is too old.

Otherwise they could have tried some navalised Gripens as they already operate some for airforce.
 
India can build carriers for Thailand, INS Vikrant is in the same class as Thailand is operating now.
 
The aircraft carrier has a rather short deck so it can only be fit to carry VTOLs

11.gif
 
The carrier is too old.

Otherwise they could have tried some navalised Gripens as they already operate some for airforce.

There is no such a thing as navalized Gripens as far as I know. How are they going to take off and land in such an small deck?
 
There is no such a thing as navalized Gripens as far as I know. How are they going to take off and land in such an small deck?
They might be able to takeoff, but it is strictly a vertical landing ship.
 
Their carrier is only 12000 tons - 1/4th. Not to mention - no money. Not to mention - let India build for itself first.

The assembly lines in India can manufacture carriers for other countries .... reason why India is spending large amount of money in building infrastructure.
 
There is no such a thing as navalized Gripens as far as I know. How are they going to take off and land in such an small deck?


There is a proposed version called Sea Gripen ...

And yes, they themselves have advertised it to have a 200 ramp as requirement hence wont work with thai carrier.


grip.JPG
 

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom