What's new

Textbooks from the hate factory

fatman17

PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
Joined
Apr 24, 2007
Messages
32,563
Reaction score
98
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Textbooks from the hate factory

By Haya Fatima Iqbal

KARACHI: The portrayal of religious minorities in textbooks prescribed by state-funded textbook boards is a grave indicator of what the country’s young people are being taught in terms of tolerance and respect for other religions.

According to a 2007 report titled ‘Producing Thinking Minds - A Report on Pakistan’s Secondary School Curricula and Textbooks’ by Enlightened Pakistan, an organisation founded by several Pakistani university students, there are numerous instances even in the 2006 edition of local textbooks for grades sixth to tenth in which sweeping generalisations have been made against people belonging to religions other than Islam.

Similarly, writings and reports by other researchers such as Pervez Hoodbhoy, Abdul Hameed Nayyar and Tariq Rahman, mention some of the sentences that have been noted in Pakistani textbooks: “Christians have always harmed the Muslims. They did not even stop from killing them. They occupied Muslims lands, looted them and treated them very badly”, “The foundation of the Hindu set-up was based on injustice and cruelty”, “The non-Muslims, especially the Hindus, did not like Muslims as they looked upon them as usurpers” and even “The Christians took to their traditional tactics of conspiring against the ruler”.

Vijay Kumar Khatri, an engineer by profession, recalls the time when he used to study at his school in Dhoronaro village, he did not feel good reading such material in class. Moreover, owing to such textbooks and children’s brought up on the part of their parents, “Children were trained to have a negative mindset from a very young age. There was definitely a level of mistrust between Hindu and Muslim students, so much so that Muslim students did not even want to drink from the glass we had used!” said Khatri.

Quaid-e-Azam University (QAU) National Institute of Pakistan Studies (NIPS) Director Dr Tariq Rahman said such material tends to bias children in a way that Muslims learn to look down upon other religions, whereas people from other religions develop antipathy towards Muslims. “It is not only legally wrong but also works against democratic values,” added Dr Rahman.

According to him, changes in curriculum had already started taking place after the year 1958, but the process sped up after Pakistan’s war of 1965 against India. However, textbooks were drastically revised during Gen Ziaul Haq’s regime. Explaining what Social Studies book were like prior to 1965, Dr Rahman relates, “When I was at school, I even read about Buddha and Gandhi and the course was not that one-sided. It did not have religious remarks at all. Also, we did not have Islamiat as a subject and what we used to study was a subject called Moral Sciences.”

Sarah John, a schoolteacher, opines that more than textbooks, it is the lessons taught to children at home that matter more as to how they behave with people of other religions. Apart from one instance at college where one of her colleagues passed a crude remark at her on the basis of her religion, she said she has not felt discriminated by people as such. However, it is the state, which has probably done the greatest injustice to her and many others in their student lives. Sarah had to study Islamiat all the way from her matriculation up to her BA, because of a prevalent notion that when students attempt an Ethics exam at the board level, they are singled out and given lower marks. The same is the case with Khatri, who had to study Islamiat in SSC and HSC because the teachers did not give detailed guidance on how to attempt an Ethics exam. “Before Matric, all the Hindu students in my class used to sit idle during Islamiat classes and we felt badly left out.”

It is also dismal to see that the only substitute for the subject of Islamiat for non-Muslim students is Ethics. “I have sometimes felt that if Muslim students are taught about Islam, I should also be taught the Bible. Even at Kinnaird, which is a Christian college, the only option I had apart from Islamiat was to study Ethics,” said Sarah. According to Khatri too, “Either all children should be taught their religions separately or there should be one subject for the whole class that comprehensively deals with all religions of the world.”

In 2002, during the rule of Gen (r) Pervez Musharraf, some changes were made to the anti-Hindu and anti-Indian content in the Social Studies textbook of grade eighth and Pakistan Studies textbook of grade ninth. Nevertheless, as Dr Rahman mentions, “Apart from textbooks, hatred continues to break into the minds of Pakistanis everyday through some television channels, radio stations, newspapers and informal hate literature too.”

Sanobar Nathaniel, a recent graduate, could not have been more realistic about the improvement in Pakistan's textbooks, as she said, “There needs a lot to be improved in our educational system in general, let alone religious issues, but considering the fact that ours is a Muslim majority country, such issues cannot be taken up or be thought to be a worthwhile fight.”
 
.
young students will beleive whatever is written in their textbooks............
brainwashing children will lead nowhere
 
.
Whenever the state has involved itself to control or influence the minds of its people and children it has come to grief.
 
.
This issue was brought up earlier in one of the threads on the forum. All that Pakistani members had to say was that the private schools where they studied never had any biased comments about minorities. And if at all possible, these biased notebooks would be used in govt. schools but nobody send their kids to such schools. We conveniently forget that many poor kids would go to such govt. schools and study from such notebooks. A poor Ajmal Kasab would take his first steps towards bigotism and Jihad through such notebooks.
 
.
Agree with author.The syllabus needs revision..In my Pakistan Studies book the whole east pakitan issue was blamed on hindus
Hindus controlled schools, they controlled trade and economy etc..our books blame hindus for everything.In fact i just read the book and i can easily quote at least 6 sentences which blame hindus.
 
.
this textbook hate culture must be stopped in pakistan as immediately as possible
 
.
this textbook hate culture must be stopped in pakistan as immediately as possible

Well as a easy solution we should replace Hindus with Indians.I don't particularity hate the material but hindus should be replaced with Indians coz all of htem are our enemy regardless of their religion if we go to war.:sniper::sniper:
 
.
Pakistani textbooks build hate culture against India

by Arif Mohammed Khan

The empowerment of terror in Pakistan has not happened overnight. This is the logical culmination of the politics and policies pursued by Pakistan for years now.

Terrorism in Pakistan has its roots in the culture of hate and the ethos of inequality on the ground of religious faith, leading to their being deeply ingrained in the Pakistani psyche and mindset.

One factor that has played a crucial role in creating this culture of hate is the educational policy of the government of Pakistan pursued since 1977. The officially prescribed textbooks, especially for school students, are full of references that promote hate against India in general, and Hindus in particular.

A cursory glance at Pakistani school textbooks - especially the compulsory subjects like Pakistan studies and social studies - gives an idea of how history has been distorted and a garbled version prescribed to build this mindset and attitude.

The objective of Pakistan’s education policy has been defined thus in the preface to a Class 6 book: "Social studies have been given special importance in educational policy so that Pakistan’s basic ideology assumes the shape of a way of life, its practical enforcement is assured, the concept of social uniformity adopts a practical form and the whole personality of the individual is developed." This statement leaves no doubt that "social uniformity", not national unity, is a part of Pakistan’s basic ideology.

The Class 5 book has this original discovery about Hindu help to bring British rule to India: "The British had the objective to take over India and to achieve this, they made Hindus join them and Hindus were very glad to side with the British. After capturing the subcontinent, the British began on the one hand the loot of all things produced in this area, and on the other, in conjunction with Hindus, to greatly suppress the Muslims."

The Std VIII book says, "Their (Muslim saints) teachings dispelled many superstitions of the Hindus and reformed their bad practices. Thereby Hindu religion of the olden times came to an end."

On Indo-Pak wars, the books give detailed descriptions and openly eulogize ‘jihad’ and ‘shahadat’ and urge students to become ‘mujahids’ and martyrs and leave no room for future friendship and cordial relations with India.

According to a Class 5 book, "In 1965, the Pakistani army conquered several areas of India, and when India was on the point of being defeated, she requested the United Nations to arrange a ceasefire. After 1965, India, with the help of Hindus living in East Pakistan, instigated the people living there against the people of West Pakistan, and finally invaded East Pakistan in December 1971. The conspiracy resulted in the separation of East Pakistan from us. All of us should receive military training and be prepared to fight the enemy."

The book prescribed for higher secondary students makes no mention of the uprising in East Pakistan in 1971 or the surrender by more than 90,000 Pakistani soldiers. Instead, it claims, "In the 1971 India-Pakistan war, the Pakistan armed forces created new records of bravery and the Indian forces were defeated everywhere."

The students of Class 3 are taught that "Muhammad Ali (Jinnah) felt that Hindus wanted to make Muslims their slaves and since he hated slavery, he left the Congress". At another place it says, "The Congress was actually a party of Hindus. Muslims felt that after getting freedom, Hindus would make them their slaves."

And this great historic discovery is taught to Std V students, "Previously, India was part of Pakistan."

Commenting on this literature that spreads hate, leading Pakistani educationist Tariq Rahman wrote, "It is a fact that the textbooks cannot mention Hindus without calling them cunning, scheming, deceptive or something equally insulting. Students are taught and made to believe that Pakistan needs strong and aggressive policies against India or else Pakistan will be annihilated by it."

(The author is a former Union minister)
 
.
Well as a easy solution we should replace Hindus with Indians.I don't particularity hate the material but hindus should be replaced with Indians coz all of htem are our enemy regardless of their religion if we go to war.:sniper::sniper:

We will go to war, if these books keep spreading hate. Why not stop mentioning these useless things in books, then we won't have to care about the war either. :toast_sign:
 
.
This is zia's fault, in my catholic school we do not read such stuff and remember that the catholic school board is responsible for many students in our country and they reject such tripe.

But in public schools this exists and need to be changed, let's review the curriculum and follow the Cambridge system all over the country.
 
.
frankly i am glad tat

our books are very study oriented rather than hate

i mean i would have hardly read 1or 2 pages of india and pakistan war

tat tooo not based on religion

it willl be brief like war started and then cease fire came,then bla bla agreement was signed in russia tats it
 
. .
Well as a easy solution we should replace Hindus with Indians.I don't particularity hate the material but hindus should be replaced with Indians coz all of htem are our enemy regardless of their religion if we go to war.:sniper::sniper:

Dont get me wrong, I do agree with you when you say that Hindus should be replaced by Indians. As long as we keep religion out of it, its better.

I feel that blaming and vilifying Hindus has been a very important and inevitable aspect of the Two-Nation theory and what we see in the textbooks post-independence is the continuation of it. Muslim League leadership ended up vilifying the Hindu to justify its creation and to provide evidence for the ill-treatment of the Muslims. Ideally this should have been stopped with the creation of Pakistan, but the subsequent leadership found it a good tool to whip up their own support. The wars didn't help either.
 
.
Actually india and Pakistan are both guilty of this, read the following:

Educating to Hate: The impact of fundamentalist ideas on school books in India and Pakistan | www.sacw.net

Hardline mentalities lays the foundation of hate and should be stopped.

The Indian list is longer, yes we are better than them as their list is longer and now I could avoid this problem.

Google you are the best, saved us again from 'Kaum ki beste' by Indians who were ganging up on this story.

Case closed as we both do it.

:pakistan:
 
.
No matter how objective you want to be, history is always seen in perspective. Pakistani history will be seen from the eyes of those who write it, and so will Indian.

In fact, Indian text book writers are also guilty of this crime. Our history is mostly seen from the eyes of the Congress party. The contributions of Muslim League, etc. are mostly ignored. During the partition, a major role was played by the RSS in settlement of migrants, yet this is completely ignored. Heck, even the role played by Sardar Patel is ignored. It’s just Gandhi and his able deputy Nehru.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom