Chak Bamu
RETIRED MOD
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2013
- Messages
- 5,361
- Reaction score
- 69
- Country
- Location
The sole purpose of one whole book is to inculcate in immature minds the half-baked propaganda of the state. No other people are so confused about their identity as the children and even the adults of Pakistan, the more the children are taught who they are not the more they get confused and ask who they really are. Nowhere in this article the writer mentioned India but you have dragged it into this discussion. The writer of this article is just saying that the children should be taught in the schools that those Pakistani who are, fortunately or unfortunately, not the followers of Islam are not the enemies of Pakistan, they are as patriotic Pakistanis as the followers of Islam can be. When the children are taught in their schools that kafirs are the enemey of islam ka qila they may automatically assume that the non-muslim Pakistanis are also our enemy. The write is emphasizing on education and strongly believe that an educated society can more easily and successfully fight the religious extremism and intolerance. He is saying that textbooks should be designed to teach children universal human values and make them good citizens. So, where is the problem?
1. Look at the thread title & the title of the quoted article.
2. You have all the answers to your rambling in my post in the first place.
3. Non-Muslims are not required to study Islamic studies. Pakistan studies is not compulsory in some cases.
4. Typical post by an Indian. Uni-dimensional, assumptions & bias doing the talking. Pathetic.