Firstly RIP soldiers
Secondly jamat ul.ahrar is asking for it and must be obliged ... otherwise they will just continue..
There must b a policy if targetted assasination in afghanistan... by all means necessary... even.if there is a 50 % chance of getting a hvt... that place in afghanistan must b struck... and reply to this one soon dont delay too long... policy needs to change to proactive from reactive
Thirdly... good work holding posts.. but all such encounters resulting in own casualaities need to go for internal audit... not for punitive but for quality improvement... every thing from troop positioning to weapons to strategy needs to be looked at... soldiers involved in battle need to be debriefed as their opinion on what they felt could b improved is most important...
Change the challenge into opoertunity
In this kind of war you evolve as your enemy does too..
RIP again
Secondly jamat ul.ahrar is asking for it and must be obliged ... otherwise they will just continue..
There must b a policy if targetted assasination in afghanistan... by all means necessary... even.if there is a 50 % chance of getting a hvt... that place in afghanistan must b struck... and reply to this one soon dont delay too long... policy needs to change to proactive from reactive
Thirdly... good work holding posts.. but all such encounters resulting in own casualaities need to go for internal audit... not for punitive but for quality improvement... every thing from troop positioning to weapons to strategy needs to be looked at... soldiers involved in battle need to be debriefed as their opinion on what they felt could b improved is most important...
Change the challenge into opoertunity
In this kind of war you evolve as your enemy does too..
RIP again