What's new

Terrorist takes Australian cafe customers hostage:

Link? Lol.

You want me to link you the website of Al Qaeda? Or ISIS? or the religion of the House of Saud? That ideology is one and same. It is known around the world as wahabism.

Prove it then. @T-Faz I see that you too are riding the stupid train as well. Come on I dare you as well to prove it, or maybe the correct definition of Wahhabism is "Any Muslim who refuses to suck Khameni's co*k when asked", that is the correct interpretation. Maybe you too would like to do that don't you? Would be an "honor" I am sure.
 
@Mosamania

Al Qaeda- Wahabi
ISIS- Wahabi
Taliban Pakistan- Deobandi/Wahabi
Taliban Afghanistan- Deobandi/Wahabi
Ansar Bayt al-Maqdis- Wahabis
al-Nusrah Front- Wahabi
Ansar al-Shari'a in Benghazi- Wahabi
Ansar al-Dine (AAD)- Wahabi
Boko Haram- Wahabi
al-Qa'ida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP)- Wahabi
Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG)- Wahabi
al-Shabaab- Wahabi
Islamic Jihad Union (IJU)- Wahabi
Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU- Wahabi
Ahrar al-Sham- Wahabi
etc

September 11 attacks- Wahabis
Madrid Train bombings- Wahabis
London Bombings- Wahabis
Bali Bombings- Wahabis
etc

Now look at which people commit terrorist atrocities around the world. Yep you guessed it, 99% of them are linked to either these groups or are influenced by the same ideology i.e Wahabism.
 
Anyone who imposes religion on people or takes it outside of their own personal life be they christians, jews, muslims is a bit odd, I find it an archaic way of pursusing your life and it should be PERSONAL, your relationship to god should be between you and "him". Blame the US/Jews etc all you want but violence in religions name has been going on since its inception, how profoundly stupid do you have to be to act out violent in the name of a religion. Allahu akbar im blowing up innocent civilians, god certainly is great. I dont believe in god but if there was one then he would surely come down hard in the "afterlife" on anyone who chants about his greatness whilst murdering people.

ISIS arent really a threat, if anyone wanted to take them out it could be done in a month, its just inconvenient and another war for what will most likely be the west to get bogged down in because no one else ever has the balls to do anything. Chinese/Russians then criticize the west for these acts whilst at home they imprison muslims, have lots of domestic terrorism and ban burkas etc whilst treating muslims like second class citizens whilst in the west most are integrated and do well.

Their very none nonsensical feeling that they are responsible of what people do around them and they must correct it, or kill those who disagree with them is the very basis of everything extreme. We share beliefs there my friend and I do believe that these extremists wither they be called ISIS or Al-Hai'ah are all due for a swift execution to rid the world of their vile existence.
 
Prove it then. @T-Faz I see that you too are riding the stupid train as well. Come on I dare you as well to prove it, or maybe the correct definition of Wahhabism is "Any Muslim who refuses to suck Khameni's co*k when asked", that is the correct interpretation. Maybe you too would like to do that don't you? Would be an "honor" I am sure.

The teachings of Muhammad Ibn Abdel Wahhab. Simple as that. With its birthplace being the Najd region, where your monarchists roam from as well. If one studies Islam at the Medina university one is studying an almost pure form of Wahhabism, where there is limited space for other strict Sunni teachings, but only very limited as I have already said. This ideology that has roamed out of your deserts is one of the reasons why Sufism, which had major influence in the Arab world, has taken a beaten by extremist Wahhabism.
 
Until now,

ABC News: no connection with Islam or Muslims. Aussies and Muslims in Australia showing solidarity with each other and are with each other in this time of distress.

A slap on the bare face of those clowns specially 'baniyas' jumping to generalise Muslims.

So you are praising Aussies for their tolerance by using generalization of Hindus. Bloody hypocrite!
 
If my history serves me correct, the fore fathers of Saudi Arabia rebelled numerous times against the Ottomans in order to set up a Wahhabi Caliphate in the early 19th century. They were smashed ruthlessly under Muhammad Ali Pasha. Yet why is it now that when the Arab nations have the capability, they still want the U.S. and NATO to do all the work against ISIS? Look at Saudi Arabia's defense spendings over the past 5 years. Being right on the border with all the action, you would think they would do more than throw spitballs at ISIS. This is a huge conspiracy in itself.

Forefathers is one word. I smell a false-flagger. What Caliphate are you talking about? Najd was ruled by indigenous dynasties. One of them (House of Saud) stroke a deal with a preacher (or what would back then be called a Muslim revolutionary) and together with their various supporters (growing) they conquered waste lands and expanded their influence. Mainly in Najd but also elsewhere. In fact it was a gradual process that almost lasted 200 years. Read up on the First Saudi State, Second and Third. In between you had various dynasties as well in Najd and nearby areas. Back then KSA was made up by various emirates, sheikdoms, kingdoms, sultanates. In fact the entire Arabian Peninsula was.

Muhammad Ali Pasha was an Albanian Ottoman that was a Pasha of Egypt but later rebelled against the Ottomans and founded his own dynasty. His armies were local Egyptian armies. Also they were not defeated. Hence them returning and ultimately conquering all of what is now KSA.

How did you come to such a conclusion? The entire ME is united in that fight. Nor is Syria or Iraq quite frankly the responsibility of any regional state. Those two state are sovereign states. The ME is not comparable to Europe or the EU.

Turkey, a Nato member and a country with the most powerful military in the ME are not doing anything of worth (much less in fact) so why do you have unrealistic demands. Not even the superpowers want to touch Syria. Hence the stalemate, failed UN resolutions that were vetoed by China and Russia respectively etc.

That defense spending is incorrect as those billions are not solely spent on the military (other users here can explain that to you) and besides KSA is the largest surplus nation in the world together with China so the regime can afford a high military spending. Besides it is only temporary as it is obviously not foreseeable to have such a big spending on the long run numbers wise and most importantly percentage wise.

Next time grab a book and read about the topics that you are blabbering about.

Mosab, don't waste your time with imbeciles. Let him worship his little Indian Prophet instead. Maybe he will calm down then.

 
Last edited:
Al Qaeda- Wahabi
ISIS- Wahabi
Taliban Pakistan- Deobandi/Wahabi
Taliban Afghanistan- Deobandi/Wahabi
Ansar Bayt al-Maqdis- Wahabis
al-Nusrah Front- Wahabi
Ansar al-Shari'a in Benghazi- Wahabi
Ansar al-Dine (AAD)- Wahabi
Boko Haram- Wahabi
al-Qa'ida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP)- Wahabi
Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG)- Wahabi
al-Shabaab- Wahabi
Islamic Jihad Union (IJU)- Wahabi
Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU- Wahabi
Ahrar al-Sham- Wahabi
etc

September 11 attacks- Wahabis
Madrid Train bombings- Wahabis
London Bombings- Wahabis
Bali Bombings- Wahabis
etc

Now look at which people commit terrorist atrocities around the world. Yep you guessed it, 99% of them are linked to either these groups or are influenced by the same ideology i.e Wahabism.

Prove that they are Wahhabi don't just say it. First define what is Wahhabism, then define who call themselves Wahhabis. then prove that these organizations do call themselves that. Then come and say your statement. You are just saying things and attaching words to these organizations that don't make any sense.

Unless your definition of Wahhabi is "Sunni Muslim who holds a gun", then my friends your entire logic is shot, nonsensical and you clearly have no idea what you are talking about except from what you read from PressTV and other like minded media articles. Which in turn makes you really sectarian, and in effect no different than said organizations in mentality.

C'mon you sons of bitches answer already I don't have all day, Is you definition of Wahhabi "Sunni Muslim with a gun"? Is that it? I thought so. Now case closed and you may forever hold your peace.
 
Where have I denied wrongdoing by Muslim countries? No country on this planet has a clean slate including Muslim nations. History is full of injustices and unforgivable crimes committed by people belong to all faiths. However, that doesn't in any way condone the wrongdoing committed by powerful states such as the US. Much of the militancy in the world today would not exist had the US not discriminated between good and bad militant groups. That's a fact you cannot deny.

PS. You don't know sh!t about me.

Oh really you never denied wrongdoings by Muslims? Then what was that claim of yours that Hinuds/Jews etc lands were never occupied nor they are/were attacked. This statement itself shows your dishonesty. We see attacks in India on regular basis by Muslim terrorists.

Wonderful, now we need to learn about good or bad militants from a Pakistani. Ever heard of the concept of good Taliban/Bad Taliban. Moreover don't forget Pakistan played a major role in creation of both good and bad militants. US just paid you money but the monsters were created by you by giving full power to your brainless mullahs.
Now you are again taking money but are again dishonest in getting rid of the real terrorists whom you consider as assets. So stop passing the buck! No ones fool here!

BTW, I don't give a $hit about who you are..
 
So you are praising Aussies for their tolerance by generalization of Hindus. Bloody hypocrite!

Don't talk on behalf of Aussies, they are immune of your hindu filthy mindset and understand who is who.
 
I think we can all agree that this is not the fault of the 'perfect' religion. [/sarcasm]
 
Prove that they are Wahhabi don't just say it. First define what is Wahhabism, then define who call themselves Wahhabis. then prove that these organizations do call themselves that. Then come and say your statement. You are just saying things and attaching words to these organizations that don't make any sense.

Unless your definition of Wahhabi is "Sunni Muslim who holds a gun", then my friends your entire logic is shot, nonsensical and you clearly have no idea what you are talking about except from what you read from PressTV and other like minded media articles. Which in turn makes you really sectarian, and in effect no different than said organizations in mentality.

I don't watch Press T.V. Wahabis are not Sunnis. If they were ISIS wouldn't be beheading Sunni tribesmen.
ISIS, Al Qaeda etc all rooted in wahabism. If you want to remain blind to this fact then so be it. The world is starting to understand the reality of Wahabi terrorism. Wahabis are just hiding behind the U.S, conveniently allowing them to invade and manipulate Muslim countries in the name of war on terror. Once the people of the U.S wake up and realise wahabism is the real threat, they will force the U.S government to abandon the Saudi terrorist regime and then the world will have peace.
 
While I'm personally going to bow out of this thread, let the doctrinal nit picking continue at your own leisure. All I care about, is that one ignorant and despicable animal who was so brainwashed by his Wahhabi ideologies is now no longer able to terrorize any more innocent people.
 
I think we can all agree that this is not the fault of the 'perfect' religion. [/sarcasm]

It is the fault of wahabis and wahabism. As I pointed in my previous post. Read it, 99% of international terrorist activities are conducted by the fascist political ideology known as wahabism.
 
Don't talk on behalf of Aussies, they are immune to your hindu filthy mindset and understand who is who.

Are you out of your mind or you can't read? When did I talk on behalf of Aussies? I was just exposing your bigotry you foulmouthed internet warrior. On one hand you are accusing Indians of generalization and in the same post you are using "baniya" which is a Pakistani slur for Hindus. Typical religious bigot.
 
Back
Top Bottom