What's new

Terror Threats to foreign players in India?

Did the terrorist who attacked mumbai run after a few minutes of attacking?

terrorist run or not,but what can one do if the police ran away

capture is a big word,ur security was even unable to shot 1 down

all they care was to only protect their :bunny:
 
.
They thought they could ....but suckers got killed. and the one that got captured ...has put Pakistan on the map of Global terrorisim.

They thought they could run? Why did they fight till death then and put themselves in hotels? Surely that's not a good way to run?

terrorist run or not,but what can one do if the police ran away

capture is a big word,ur security was even unable to shot 1 down

all they care was to only protect their

Doesn't matter, you're deviating from the topic.
 
.
.
Doesn't matter, you're deviating from the topic.
what deviation my frnd,u bring up matters but dont have any information to prove it

u r claiming the terrorist were not caught or killed because they ran away,and who will catch them ur police who ran much before them
 
.
You know, stuff like this makes me believe the attack was a conspiracy. The terrorists were supposed to be skilled and knowing what they're doing, yet they forgot something as important as the GPS. And of course the rest of the rest of the terrorists all had the GPS but were not told of the escape plan.

However, India does not explain in the dossier how the terrorists would have gone back and why the plan failed. The escape out of Mumbai could not have been on the MV Kuber. The handlers of the terrorists wanted the vessel to be sunk. India's dossier carries the transcript of a conversation by the terrorists that shows this: "Caller: Did you open the locks for the water below? (Probably of MV Kuber). Terrorist: No, they did not open the locks. We left it like that because of being in a hurry. We made a big mistake." New Delhi believes that the return plan by ship was for real given the intricate planning outlined by the GPS data. Qasab too has confessed in his interrogation that Abu Hamza, a top LeT man, had motivated them that they could return safely after the Mumbai attack.

Can one not see the contradiction here. They had planned intricately for the escape, yet forgot to take the most important thing, GPS/Phone, from the ship. The explanation that another ship came is unreasonable since these guys who are supposed to be well trained would have remained calm and take the GPS/phone. And the fact that they were in indian waters means it wouldn't matter if there was another ship. I could go on but since this is off-topic I will not add more.
 
.
You know, stuff like this makes me believe the attack was a conspiracy. The terrorists were supposed to be skilled and knowing what they're doing, yet they forgot something as important as the GPS. And of course the rest of the rest of the terrorists all had the GPS but were not told of the escape plan.



Can one not see the contradiction here. They had planned intricately for the escape, yet forgot to take the most important thing, GPS/Phone, from the ship. The explanation that another ship came is unreasonable since these guys who are supposed to be well trained would have remained calm and take the GPS/phone. And the fact that they were in indian waters means it wouldn't matter if there was another ship. I could go on but since this is off-topic I will not add more.


Well you are the one who initiated this off topic discussion....

Anyways...just for sake of argument.....its the mistakes like these...dropping off GPS Phones...and Nor Drowning the Boat ..that got Pakistan ...into trouble.
 
.
what deviation my frnd,u bring up matters but dont have any information to prove it

u r claiming the terrorist were not caught or killed because they ran away,and who will catch them ur police who ran much before them


The proof that ISI knew about it is good enough. I can guarantee you that if an attack took place on a team in india and RAW report suggested it was going to be ISI you wouldn't even thinking it twice.


Why did they not kill the Sri Lankan players? Ground report suggests that not a whole lot of bullets were fired.

http://img63.imageshack.us/i/pak2g.jpg/

Which is clear from this photo. They only fired so many bullets which was enough to do the job - take cricket away from Pakistan.
 
.
Well you are the one who initiated this off topic discussion....

Anyways...just for sake of argument.....its the mistakes like these...dropping off GPS Phones...and Nor Drowning the Boat ..that got Pakistan ...into trouble.

I did not start off-topic discussion. I simply answered another Pakistani forumer and that's when indians jumped in. Yes, the highly skilled terrorists make so many childish mistakes. And getting worried after seeing a ship, that's just a big LOL.
 
.
You know, stuff like this makes me believe the attack was a conspiracy. The terrorists were supposed to be skilled and knowing what they're doing, yet they forgot something as important as the GPS. And of course the rest of the rest of the terrorists all had the GPS but were not told of the escape plan.



Can one not see the contradiction here. They had planned intricately for the escape, yet forgot to take the most important thing, GPS/Phone, from the ship. The explanation that another ship came is unreasonable since these guys who are supposed to be well trained would have remained calm and take the GPS/phone. And the fact that they were in indian waters means it wouldn't matter if there was another ship. I could go on but since this is off-topic I will not add more.
comeon man now dont say ur home production r well trained,no one in india belives ur army is even trained,and what made u think they will escape back after entering the heart of mumbai,they made a big mistake then considering the security would b lame
 
.
comeon man now dont say ur home production r well trained,no one in india belives ur army is even trained,and what made u think they will escape back after entering the heart of mumbai,they made a big mistake then considering the security would b lame

It's india who is saying they are well trained. I will not go more into this beacuse it is off-topic and has been dragged too much.
 
.
The proof that ISI knew about it is good enough. I can guarantee you that if an attack took place on a team in india and RAW report suggested it was going to be ISI you wouldn't even thinking it twice.


Why did they not kill the Sri Lankan players? Ground report suggests that not a whole lot of bullets were fired.

http://img63.imageshack.us/i/pak2g.jpg/

Which is clear from this photo. They only fired so many bullets which was enough to do the job - take cricket away from Pakistan.

dude raw has many other things to do rather than thinking abt cricket
 
.
Again, I will not drag this off-topic discussion further.
 
.
This was reported in the media (ISI having knowing about this attack in advance) and in fact the document that ISI gave to the police was released to public. I am sure if you were active around the time of the attack you'd have seen it.

and your proofs are weapons which not just made in India but in other countries also. the guys are not circumscribed so does that mean they are indians... there are hell lot of people who are not circumscribed. India is not short of people who are circumscribed if you last remember. Apart from zaid hamid theories what are the proofs. when asked about the numbers on the guns and their actual location for production you guys go dud. then what is the proof.
 
.
Did you not read my last post? That's actually a great discussion point for another topic, but only another topic.
 
.
Did you not read my last post? That's actually a great discussion point for another topic, but only another topic.
my frnd u bring a lot of topics but run out of sources every time,what else u show is some pakistani media creation

if u dont have good source then please dont bring mor topics for discussion rather than escaping saying off topic
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom