Terror attack in Kabul 4 Indians killed.

[graphican]

The murderer is the one who sends terrorists across the border, finances them and arms them. Along with that spreads toxic religious ideology to create more foot soldiers.

The fault for each death goes to Pakistan.

You are stuck with a stupid logic. Here, study article 307 of your own constitution. Section 307 in The Indian Penal Code If you cannot learn on your own, ask somebody to help you.

 

[tsinga]

You are stuck with a stupid logic. Here, study article 307 of your own constitution. Section 307 in The Indian Penal Code If you cannot learn on your own, ask somebody to help you.

It is under Section 307 that instigators are charged with murder if the Government body(Police/Military) has to shoot someone.

Why is this difficult for you to grasp? Pakistan is responsible for instigating, spreading terrorist ideology, arms and financing the terrorism across India. Therefore for any deaths that result because of those actions of Pakistan, Pakistan will be held culpable.

 

[graphican]

It is under Section 307 that instigators are charged with murder if the Government body(Police/Military) has to shoot someone.

Why is this difficult for you to grasp? Pakistan is responsible for instigating, spreading terrorist ideology, arms and financing the terrorism across India. Therefore for any deaths that result because of those actions of Pakistan, Pakistan will be held culpable.

Entire Pakistan demands libation of Kashmir which it its territory. The Muslim Majority Territory meant to be Pakistan by every definition. It is India responsible for the murder and killings of Kashmiris who were asking for their birth-right, right to choose their fate also recognized by UN and Nehru too agreed. There is a reason why Kashmir is still not a part of India and even Indian Constitution recognizes it.

 

[tsinga]

Entire Pakistan demands libation of Kashmir which it its territory. The Muslim Majority Territory meant to be Pakistan by every definition. It is India responsible for the murder and killings of Kashmiris who were asking for their birth-right, right to choose their fate also recognized by UN and Nehru too agreed. There is a reason why Kashmir is still not a part of India and even Indian Constitution recognizes it.

Pakistan has no right whatsoever.
The princely states had the right to choose their own fates. The Raja of Kashmir signed the Accession agreement with India, India still honours the very same agreement and is why it has not incorporated kashmir as other states of India as per the terms agreed with the Raja.

The second Raja of Kashmir signed the accord with India, Pakistan's demands carried zilch weight. You can demand Congo for all we care now.

 

[graphican]

Pakistan has no right whatsoever.
The princely states had the right to choose their own fates. The Raja of Kashmir signed the Accession agreement with India, India still honours the very same agreement and is why it has not incorporated kashmir as other states of India as per the terms agreed with the Raja.

The second Raja of Kashmir signed the accord with India, Pakistan's demands carried zilch weight. You can demand Congo for all we care now.

The dream agreement which India could never produce in UN? The agreement which is even absent from Indian Constitution? The agreement which had no witness and no handing-over taking-over? The Agreement of a princely state with a democratic state? You guys sound silly when you speak this $hit and there is a reason why India tries its best to stop a talk on the matter cause every time it does, it looses more credibility.

 

[tsinga]

The dream agreement which India could never produce in UN? The agreement which is even absent from Indian Constitution? The agreement which had no witness and no handing-over taking-over? The Agreement of a princely state with a democratic state? You guys sound silly when you speak this $hit and there is a reason why India tries its best to stop a talk on the matter cause every time it does, it looses more credibility.

Yeah, the Instrument of Accession was something the Indians created in their minds.


As I said, for all we care, Pakistan can also claim Congo. Pakistan isn't getting an inch of Kashmir.

 

[graphican]

Yeah, the Instrument of Accession was something the Indians created in their minds.
As I said, for all we care, Pakistan can also claim Congo. Pakistan isn't getting an inch of Kashmir.

So your Indian arguments stopped when it came to proof? Is that the only long your logic could stretch? This is the foundation of your "ownership" of Kashmir? The Territory which has seen blood of 70,000 Muslims and still you cannot afford to let International Media in your "owned" territory. Go fill some colors in the map of India and tell yourself that you own it because of bullets and bull$hit arguments. But how long? Kashmir is awakening everyday more.

On side note, where did this ceremony of transfer of Kashmir took place? When was it held? Who was the witness and who from Indian Side represented India to take ownership. Was any media, any photographer, any witness, any historian, any British National or even Indian Constitutional member there? NO one? Nothing? And you still buy your country's told dirty story?

 

[tsinga]

So your Indian arguments stopped when it came to proof? Is that the only long your logic could stretch? This is the foundation of your "ownership" of Kashmir? The Territory which has seen blood of 70,000 Muslims and still you cannot afford to let International Media in your "owned" territory. Go fill some colors in the map of India and tell yourself that you own it because of bullets and bull$hit arguments. But how long? Kashmir is awakening everyday more.

On side note, where did this ceremony of transfer of Kashmir took place? When was it held? Who was the witness and who from Indian Side represented India to take ownership. Was any media, any photographer, any witness, any historian, any British National or even Indian Constitutional member there? NO one? Nothing? And you still buy your country's told dirty story?

All it would have taken is this:
Instrument of Accession (Jammu and Kashmir) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

For the documents, here:
Instrument of Accession (Jammu and Kashmir)

 

[graphican]

All it would have taken is this:
Instrument of Accession (Jammu and Kashmir) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

so present that in UN, why has your country only used it in here and failed the case in United Nations. UN asked India to conduct plebiscite as this $hit is worth Indian minds to poison. Why did it loose its case there? Do you dare asking? Too afraid you would learn the truth?

 

[tsinga]

so present that in UN, why has your country only used it in here and failed the case in United Nations. UN asked India to conduct plebiscite as this $hit is worth Indian minds to poison. Why did it loose its case there? Do you dare asking? Too afraid you would learn the truth?

UN listed out conditions for the plebicite to be held.

Pakistan failed those conditions, therefore India refused the plebicite. Ergo, now Plebicite issue is dead.

Now you have the IoA disregarding the fact that the ruler signed over his country to India. Period.

 

[graphican]

UN listed out conditions for the plebicite to be held.

Pakistan failed those conditions, therefore India refused the plebicite. Ergo, now Plebicite issue is dead.

Now you have the IoA disregarding the fact that the ruler signed over his country to India. Period.

Hold On ! Here you fail. Why is there need of plebiscite when "princely state has been acceded to India"? That means the acceding didn't got accepted as there is no credible document to prove that it actually happen. UN listed conditions and India never earned enough trust to let Kashmiris get their right. Your country is so afraid of Kashmris that it doesn't let independent media see them - wao - what an ownership! And is India a Accession State or Democratic State? Obviously democracy is not for Kashmir. Isn't it?

So the document of accession, as it stands doesn't stand any value other than a source of false veils to poison truth seeking Indians.

UN listed out conditions for the plebicite to be held.

Pakistan failed those conditions, therefore India refused the plebicite. Ergo, now Plebicite issue is dead.

Now you have the IoA disregarding the fact that the ruler signed over his country to India. Period.

And see the face of your "proof" of ownership.

And this made you owners of bodies and souls of entire Kashmris. Regretful that you guys are fed with that.

 

[Suman]

you people could not save which was yours (Bangladesh) and you asking about the land which doesn't belong to you, hawa mein talware chala rahe ho