Which was those I was referring to. Genetics were once one of my many fields of interests so I do have a above average level of knowledge about this field.
The fact of the matter, which you somehow omitted or misunderstood, is that their ancestors (those of the San peoples etc.) are extinct as well.
Everyone on this planet is inbreed as we are all related.
No, I don't because I never said that languages were more important than peoples. I just said that with the extinction of peoples you also lose more than peoples. You lose languages, history, folklore etc.
Brown/black haired people have always ruled the planet and continue to do so. 98% of all the planet's people have brown/black hair.
Semites arguably have the oldest, most numerous and most impressive civilizations of all peoples in Antiquity.
Moreover the Sumerians might not have spoken a Semitic language (Semitic languages belong to the Afro-Asiatic language family which is the oldest major language family in the world) but they themselves traced their origins to Eastern Arabia (what is now the Eastern Province of KSA and Bahrain) which they themselves wrote in the Epic of Gilgamesh (considered the world's first truly great work of literature). So they were definitely related to the nearby Semitic speaking peoples. After all languages and ancestry are two different things.
Besides the Marsh Arabs of Southern Iraq who are more linked to the ancient Sumerians in culture, habits and geography than any other peoples also show a very uniform ancestry that connects them to the Arabian Peninsula. I don't think that it is a coincidence that people of Southern Iraq, Bahrain and Eastern Arabia cluster with each other on modern DNA tests.
@Norwegian
The West has dominated for the past 500 years but earlier it was people from the ME, South Asia, East Asia, Africa etc. that dominated the world for millenniums.
Nevetheless I do agree that serious changes must happen but the lack of scientists compared to Westerners have nothing to do with a predisposition for lack of knowledge etc. In such a case the same Westerners, mostly Germanic peoples (not Greeks, Italians etc. who otherwise have the oldest civilizations of ancient Europe) would not have been able to produce what they have produced in the past 500 years or so.
I am studying in Copenhagen. No, I am not into that business. No Arabs that I know about are. Those are mostly Eastern Europeans and Turks I believe.
Human trafficking apparently Romanians and Nigerians.
I actually rarely see blonds even here in Denmark. Many girls have also dyed their hair blond. Men with blond hair even more rarely. Let alone France. Most Germans are not blond either. Blonds are only a majority in Scandinavia and Netherlands. Probably Scotland too. Nowhere else. Blonds are even a minority in Iceland as I recall it.
Blond - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In all seriousness then how many famous scientists from Northern Sweden and Finalnd can you mention my friend? That are blond moreover.
Anyway this discussion about hair color etc. has been rather surreal but that's what Scandinavian humor can do to you.