Tensions in Indian city of Ayodhya ahead of Babri Mosque verdict

[newb3e]

mandir waheen banay gaa!!!

 

[Rusty]

No I agree with you. Muslim invaders came here with the massage of love and peace. They never destroyed the temple of worship of others. They even today don't do that. The news pf numerous mosques of other Muslims blown today are fake.

Agree with me or not, you just have to realize how retarded you are for throwing around fake numbers and fairy tales.

Every religion on Earth has had it's holy places destroyed or desecrated at one point or another. Monkey worshipers are not special.

The only difference is that you people think that it was done in the name of religion and it was done systematically. In reality it was done due to politics and only selectively. The only religious group in the modern world who destroy holy places are Hindus, destroying Mosques and Churches.

Honestly, watch this video. One of the few sane Indians in the world and he is an actual Dr.
Unlike most hindutva scum who don't even know how to use a toilet.

Yeah yeah no temple was destroyed to build mosques on them. Boy! talk about having head in the sand.

That is 1, waiting for the next 39,999 picture of proof.

 

[Hindustani78]

There is as much archaeological evidence of the Ram temple existing as there is of a monkey god flying around.

Yes , There is Evidence of Bhagwan Shree Ram Birth Place and Hindustanis laugh on this that we have to teach all the Jahils (Ignorants of Deen e Arya and Deen e Islam). Nawabs (Kings) of Faizabad, Hyderabad Dakkan, Awadh, Bhopal, Bengal all wants the Construction of Bhagwan Shree Ram Mandir and are even aware about the Stand of the Badshah Salamats (Emperors) of Mysore, Travancore, Kashmir, Punjab, Bengal, Jodhpur, Madurai, Gwailor, Pune, Hyderabad(Dakkan).

What would we have done?
First, we would not have made up a fairy tale and then used that fairy tale to destroy a 500 year old mosque.

Researchs are there but with time all the Hindus/Indians will be made about the events which took place during the British Invasion of Shree Ayodhya. Hindustanis Followers of Deen e Arya and Deen e Islam fought with whom and for what ?

Second, we would re-evaluate our religious philosophy and ask why it causes so much hatred in us.

Clashes of Civilisation. Hindu Rashtra / Hindustani Quam / Indian Nation have always fought the Invaders be those are Tunani's(Greeks), Mooghuls(Mongols/Mughals), Turanis/Turalis(Tribes of Uran and Ural/Safavids).

 

[Rusty]

Yes , There is Evidence of Bhagwan Shree Ram Birth Place and Hindustanis laugh on this that we have to teach all the Jahils (Ignorants of Deen e Arya and Deen e Islam). Nawabs (Kings) of Faizabad, Hyderabad Dakkan, Awadh, Bhopal, Bengal all wants the Construction of Bhagwan Shree Ram Mandir and are even aware about the Stand of the Badshah Salamats (Emperors) of Mysore, Travancore, Kashmir, Punjab, Bengal, Jodhpur, Madurai, Gwailor, Pune, Hyderabad(Dakkan).



Researchs are there but with time all the Hindus/Indians will be made about the events which took place during the British Invasion of Shree Ayodhya. Hindustanis Followers of Deen e Arya and Deen e Islam fought with whom and for what ?



Clashes of Civilisation. Hindu Rashtra / Hindustani Quam / Indian Nation have always fought the Invaders be those are Tunani's(Greeks), Mooghuls(Mongols/Mughals), Turanis/Turalis(Tribes of Uran and Ural/Safavids).

Did you just learn how to use parenthesis and now are hyper excited to use them? (it's stupid to use to many parenthesis)

There is evidence that Hindus want to use toilets, but just don't do it.
Just because I use the word "evidence" does not mean I proved anything.

That second sentence is so retarded that I had to read it a few times.
Hindus also fought for every invader, every time!!
They fought for British, Mughals, Afghans, etc etc
The problem with your retarded Hinutva is that you're retarded and have very little understanding of actual history.

Clash of civilization is a phony concept made by chicken hawks to justify war against minorities.
As soon as they themselves become minorities, then all civilizations become equal.
A billion Hindus in India make you guys very confident in attacking minorities... when you move to the gulf or the west... well you become eunuchs real fast.

 

[Politico]

Did you just learn how to use parenthesis and now are hyper excited to use them? (it's stupid to use to many parenthesis)

There is evidence that Hindus want to use toilets, but just don't do it.
Just because I use the word "evidence" does not mean I proved anything.

That second sentence is so retarded that I had to read it a few times.
Hindus also fought for every invader, every time!!
They fought for British, Mughals, Afghans, etc etc
The problem with your retarded Hinutva is that you're retarded and have very little understanding of actual history.

Clash of civilization is a phony concept made by chicken hawks to justify war against minorities.
As soon as they themselves become minorities, then all civilizations become equal.
A billion Hindus in India make you guys very confident in attacking minorities... when you move to the gulf or the west... well you become eunuchs real fast.

You become rather demeaning and insulting when a counter narrative to yours is put up. Somewhat similar to an internet bully. Reminds me of this little guy from our campus who used to demean and ridicule his fellow students anonymously on the internet chat groups, until some of them learned his true identity. Yours is not the absolute view on this forum. Obviously mods have a selective personal and religious attacks policy on this forum. For you that must be such a prize

 

[Vikki]

This logic is nonsensical.

It does. Where were the hindus when the temple was destroyed? Muslims won the battle and got their rewards. This is logical.


No place should be given back. Why did the hindus fail to protect their heritage and why should Muslims today compromise for their failures?

If the cucks have the strength let them try to take them by force.


These are all relatively new temples. Original temples means built in the pre Islamic times. I don't know why you are ashamed about this fact. Our Prophet destroyed pagan idols and liberated the people from jahalat. He is our guide and source of motivation.

I wanted to say the bolded part myself..but as a hindu if i had said tht i would have been banned..good tht you have admitted

 

[Rusty]

You become rather demeaning and insulting when a counter narrative to yours is put up. Somewhat similar to an internet bully. Reminds me of this little guy from our campus who used to demean and ridicule his fellow students anonymously on the internet chat groups, until some of them learned his true identity. Yours is not the absolute view on this forum. Obviously mods have a selective personal and religious attacks policy on this forum. For you that must be such a prize

Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
If Indians want to say stupid stuff, why can't I reply with a similar response?

Internet bully?
Indians routinely call Pakistanis "Prokistan" "Jihadis" "Napak" etc etc.
I only used the medical term "Retarded" in reference to their proven low IQ, so how am I the bully?

And you remind me of this guy in my camp who would defend racist Hindus and call Pakistanis bullies anonymously on the internet chat groups, funnily enough he also also got found out. Its funny how we both have the same made up story.

I never claimed my views to be anything other then my own, but I am also not sitting on a pretentious high horse like you.

Mods are free to reprimand me, and believe me they do and have. I just have very little patience with an enemy nation pushing lies. To the Indians, you must also be a prize as you will defend their attacks on Pakistanis and admonish us for replying back.

 

[Nein]

I know many churches were pagan temples like the ummayad mosque but that doesn’t give the right to anyone to change them by force

Why are christians crying about it?? I literally list so many mosques that were turned into churches.

People dont realise the changing places of worship was done to complete victory or done for the long term to convert people.

Hagia Sophia was not turned into a mosque just for the fun of it.

Be happy that the Ottomans, Ummayads or the Abbassids were not rabid fundamentalists like isis. If it was isis they would have no problem in looting and destroying the Hagia sophia.

 

[Kabira]

Yeah yeah no temple was destroyed to build mosques on them. Boy! talk about having head in the sand.

That mandir was build on dalit temple by central asian aryan invaders. Why stop at year 1000, lets go back to 1000BC.

 

[Fireurimagination]

That mandir was build on dalit temple by central asian aryan invaders. Why stop at year 1000, lets go back to 1000BC.

Dalit temple? why only 1000 BC please go 30000 BC or even start of time, you will find only Dharma/Hinduism. The fact is Islam came from middle east, the fact is Hindu places of worship was destroyed and Hindus converted. The same happened in Persia, in modern times the same happened in Africa, Australia etc (by Islam and Christanity). We resisted and survived still lost half of our landmass and people.

 

[Nein]

Dalit temple? why only 1000 BC please go 30000 BC or even start of time, you will find only Dharma/Hinduism. The fact is Islam came from middle east, the fact is Hindu places of worship was destroyed and Hindus converted. The same happened in Persia, in modern times the same happened in Africa, Australia etc (by Islam and Christanity). We resisted and survived still lost half of our landmass and people.

Landmass? the Indians barely moved out of India. You only stayed in and built some empires in your land you never went outside of India compared to other Empires like the Ottomans, Romans, Persians, British, Caliphates, Russians and the others that took it into other continents.

 

[Kabira]

Dalit temple? why only 1000 BC please go 30000 BC or even start of time, you will find only Dharma/Hinduism. The fact is Islam came from middle east, the fact is Hindu places of worship was destroyed and Hindus converted. The same happened in Persia, in modern times the same happened in Africa, Australia etc (by Islam and Christanity). We resisted and survived still lost half of our landmass and people.

Please dont make fool out of yourself. Hinduism is like 2500 years old in Ayodhya, came with invaders from north west.

 

[-blitzkrieg-]

pure RSS BS.. The only temples that got damaged yes...damaged were the one that got caught up in fire fight and got damaged by catapults..As enemy would try to use it as cover..LAter this and the imaginary temples(that never existed) were used to brainwash hindus against the Muslims..

 

[The_Showstopper]

I don't remember reading about a controversy of a similar nature around the places you have quoted.
Regardless, you and I can argue about the relative importance, the judiciary has the responsibility of being impartial and far removed from sentiments. They have so far done a good job IMO.

Its not above controversy, its about the claim of "most important" site for hindus.

 

[Hindustani78]

Ram temple is to hindus what Mecca is to muslims in its symbolic value.

Shree Kailash Manasarovar is one of the Holiest Site for the Hindu Nation. Bhagwan Shree Ram went to Shree Kailash Manasarovar by crossing the Sarayu River. Shree Ayodhya is Situated on the Banks of River Sarayu.

A muslim ruler had destroyed (claimed) the temple and built a mosque in its place.

Mongol invader Sebugtin was already at Wars with Afghan Hindu Shahis and the Soldiers of Afghan Hindu Shahis were Followers of Deen e Arya and Deen e Islam, Mongol Invader Sebugtin's Son Alptin was the one who raided India for 17 times. Somnath Mandir/Deval/Masajeeds and many other Mandirs/Devals were destroyed by Mongol Invader Alptin.