What's new

Tejas is superior than JF-17 - Parrikar

Status
Not open for further replies.
.
My one comment hurts you so much but for that I have given you the link but about your fellow countrymen who still thinks that Tejas could not fly, and the ADA, DRDO, HAL are idiots.


Here is one more intelligent pakistani member.

Maybe you should also need to look closer to your heart for the publicity generated for DRDO..... but then you have no such intentions....more destined to be part of the hunting pack.

BRIG HEMANT MAHAJAN NATIONAL SECURITY: DRDO IS CALLED SECRET WEAPON OF ISI & PAKISTAN
 
.
India painfully built up some jet fighter development skills in the 1960s, then threw them away. It then started all over again, but in the wrong way. Instead of developing technology, building skills subcontracting & making components then moving on to design, it tried to do everything at once.

State-owned manufacturers waiting to be told what to do by the government instead of looking for business & to improve marketable skills, state researchers & developers working without reference to the market, buyers (government & armed forces) not interested in or unaware of what's needed to maintain an industrial & R&D base - standard Indian domestic military procurement problems.
 
.
My one comment hurts you so much but for that I have given you the link but about your fellow countrymen who still thinks that Tejas could not fly, and the ADA, DRDO, HAL are idiots.


Here is one more intelligent pakistani member.
Not as much as intelligent you are....! What a silly excuse this is? Which stupid AF inducts a new plane to its full potential in start?
Obviously you induct a plane and add more lethal capabilities to it with time like the whole world did and is doing...But looks like since your orgasm with French has ended and now you have no other option but to boast about a junk in public to please your audience..Thanks and don't quote me again...I know with what sh!t you are gonna reply with...!
 
.
A troll calling other names.. :lol:

You sire are the biggest troll here who likes to hide behind professional tag.

Right.

In Internet slang, a troll (/ˈtroʊl/, /ˈtrɒl/) is a person who sows discord on the Internet by starting arguments or upsetting people, by posting inflammatory,extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog) with the deliberate intent of provoking readers into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion, often for their own amusement.

Which comment of mine and where did you find that this definition fit?
 
.
@Windjammer
Unfortunately for the Indian's I think their Nationalist drunkenness, has got in the way of this indigenous design! They failed to seriously take into consideration that teething problems can and often come with such a advanced approach to designing a state of the art combat aircraft, let alone one of multi-role (jack of all trades). I think they have bitten more off than they could chew!

Like that of the PRC, India's claim and so much rhetoric about indigenous ingenuity and skill, is undermined by one of the principle components of a modern combat fighter - its engine! For as is the case with the PRC's J-10 fundamental reliance on a foreign engine (Russian AL-31FN). The Indian's have had to rely on the United States to provide the initial engines for the prototypes, then the French to assist in its plagued indigenous GTRE GTX-35VS Kaveri turbofan, before finally electing to power the design with the General Electric F414 as the fundamental heart of its Tejas / LCA.

Finally if things were not difficult enough, the Indian Government / Military decided to add a major complication to a project already under extreme strain - that of a carrier-based derivative of the Tejas / LCA for use by the Indian Navy!

As for me, if I was in India making the choices and decisions, I would have brought the rights to the defunct F-20 Tigershark from Northrop, and tooled up to build me an exceptional and affordable light weight, multi-role fighter, which was powered by the GE F404, and if need be, probably could have been modified to take the even more powerful General Electric F414!!
 
. .
Really? You have some plans? And any time you want to open the chapter on Indo-Pak aerial warfare history, just let me know.

Actually sir, there are alot of threads already open on the issue of the aerial war history between both the nations, I've never really seen your contribution there ... as I do like to read the narratives especially of the people that have been in the services for either nation ... As far as what I've said ... this is what the Indian side says today ...

The Indian Air Force was numerically superior, with 28 combat squadrons to PAF's 11, but it was saddled with technologically inferior fighters. And, caught off-guard by the PAF offensive, India had lost 35 of its aircraft on the ground during pre-emptive strikes — one on Pathankot on September 6 and then on Kalaikunda, a day later.
IAF takes a candid look at the 1965 war - The Times of India

In other words, the IAF which touts Gnats as the "saber slayers" with Mig-21's,Hunters and Mystère IV were technologically inferior to the F-86's the PAF fielded ... the same fighter that saw losses at the hands of Mig-15's in the Korean war ...

Your welcome to prove the claims the Indian side makes today, but please don't mind if the Pakistani side takes your explanations with a pinch of salt ... after all, your peers have given quite a good reason for us to do so...

The Hindu : Front Page : Army admits Siachen unit faked enemy kills
 
.
Actually sir, there are alot of threads already open on the issue of the aerial war history between both the nations, I've never really seen your contribution there ... as I do like to read the narratives especially of the people that have been in the services for either nation ... As far as what I've said ... this is what the Indian side says today ...



In other words, the IAF which touts Gnats as the "saber slayers" with Mig-21's,Hunters and Mystère IV were technologically inferior to the F-86's the PAF fielded ... the same fighter that saw losses at the hands of Mig-15's in the Korean war ...

Your welcome to prove the claims the Indian side makes today, but please don't mind if the Pakistani side takes your explanations with a pinch of salt ... after all, your peers have given quite a good reason for us to do so...

The Hindu : Front Page : Army admits Siachen unit faked enemy kills
Don't give him facts..He will get a heart attack tonight :cheesy:
 
. . . .
Status
Not open for further replies.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom