Ted Cruz Says the Next President Have Two Choices: Allow Iran to Get Nukes, or Send in the Military!

[chhota bheem]

if US wants to remain the sole super power of the world,it should stop worring about Iran and it nukes,the threat to their status is from china.

 

[Gufi]

The American public is being told that they have two options by the republicans, it is war or sanctions while the democrats are adamant that they are buying time for some later confrontation while reducing the nuclear threat.
I think Obama believes that commerce is the greatest corrupting power Americans have. They can use soft diplomacy and use their growing influence like they did in countries that they had proper relations with.
Right now it is a game of who votes first, America or Iran. Also, it is very clear that America is in no mode to destabilise the region further with more war and has clearly said that they can dismantle reactors, but can not restrict the knowledge that the Iranians already have. A very complex situation seems to be shaping up with the Republicans not only needing a clear majority, but a 2/3 majority to over turn the President.

 

[WAJsal]

Jul. 23, 2015 4:14pm

If Congress doesn’t kill the Iran nuclear deal, the next president will have two choices, Texas Sen. Ted Cruz said after attending a rally in front of the White House opposed to the deal.

“Any commander in chief worth his salt should be prepared on the first day of his presidency to repudiate this disastrous deal,” Cruz told TheBlaze Thursday. “The next president in all likelihood will enter the Oval Office and be informed that he or she has one of two choices: Either acquiesce in allowing Iran to acquire nuclear weapons because Iran is likely to be on the verge of acquiring nuclear weapons due to President Obama’s catastrophic nuclear deal; or two, use direct military force to prevent that from happening.”


Republican presidential candidate Sen. Ted Cruz debates the Iran nuclear deal with Code Pink co-founder Medea Benjamin during a rally in Lafayette Square, July 23, 2015 in Washington. The rally, organized by Concerned Women for America, was held to protest the recent nuclear deal reached between the United States and Iran but was interrupted by protesters from Code Pink who support the deal. (Win McNamee/Getty Images)

The 2016 Republican presidential candidate called on a crowd at Lafayette Square, across the street from the White House, to light up the phone lines of members of Congress to get a veto-proof majority to vote down the deal.

“Front and center in 2016 is going to be a discussion about how we protect this nation,” Cruz said. “It is going to be a major issue, in the 2016 campaign in the primary, and in the general election as well, and Hillary Clinton will have the opportunity to explain to the American people why she is OK with a nuclear Iran. I think it poses an existential threat to Israel and an enormous threat to the United States of America.”

Concerned Women for America organized the rally, which included several speakers, including Cruz. White House press secretary Josh Earnest referred to the event as a “pro-war rally.”

“All opponents of the deal will have the opportunity to explain why they would oppose the best way for us to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon and that is through diplomacy,” Earnest told reporters.

A contingent from the anti-war group Code Pink sought to crash the rally and shout down Cruz.

The Code Pink chants of “war monger, war monger” were mostly drowned out by shouts of “We want Ted.” But the sign-waving crowds on both sides were surprised when Cruz invited one someone from the group to speak. “You want to yell and scream, come forward,” Cruz said. Watch the full exchange here.

The event turned into a point-counterpoint at the microphone between the 2016 presidential candidate and Code Pink co-founder Medea Benjamin, who said “it is absolutely false” that Iran wants to develop a nuclear weapon. Benjamin added, “We are surrounded by zealots here who would rather have war in the Middle East.”

Cruz answered each of her questions, and neither convinced the other. But the shouting settled.

“I don’t want peace at the price of millions of Americans,” Cruz said.

Asked about his motivation for getting into a debate with Code Pink, Cruz told TheBlaze he believes in the First Amendment.

“I think it is unfortunate when you see protesters try to shout down speech, I don’t think that is an appropriate way to persuade you’re fellow citizens,” Cruz said. “They have passionate views and I was willing to engage with them and discuss it on the merits, and I hope some of the discussion caused them to reconsider facts that they believed in were not accurate.”

Much of the rally was based on why the United States did not seek the release of four Americans held in Iran. Though that was not part of the deal, President Barack Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry have repeatedly said they are doing everything they can to get the prisoners free.

Asked if he believes that, Cruz told TheBlaze “no.”

“Actions speak louder than words,” Cruz said. “The president can’t bring himself to utter their names. When the president announced this deal, nowhere in his remarks were found the words Pastor Saeed Abedini, Amir Hekmati, Jason Rezaian, Robert Levinson. If he will not speak their names, it is of no surprise that they have not been released.”

Ted Cruz Says the Next President Will Have Two Choices: Allow Iran to Get Nukes, or Send in the Military | Video | TheBlaze.com

@Gufi , in my opinion this is simply fanaticism and stupidity, maybe to attract people to vote for them. Military operation option won't work and is too risky. Killing the deal makes no sense as deal itself is quite elaborate and understandable why Obama let it pass. These people are just pro-Israel, they can't see an Iran with no sanctions. This was the best deal that could be achieved by two parties. Overall just making a facade, nothing much.

A very complex situation seems to be shaping up with the Republicans not only needing a clear majority, but a 2/3 majority to over turn the President.

Interesting, they can overturn his verdict or himself? elaborate.

 

[rohitshubham]

Still better than Donald Trump

 

[Gufi]

Interesting, they can overturn his verdict or himself? elaborate.

Presidental orders need 2/3 majority to be over turned. Congress has republican majority, but not enough. The lobbies are busy right now to try and somehow curtail this deal.

Military operation option won't work and is too risky.

It will work temporarily, but the consequences will be dire for the whole region. It is not difficult to target military and atomic installations but it will cause massive retributions and destabilise the Middle east further.
Israel is the one who is going to try something as a last ditch effort if things do not go their way for some time. Obama and the Israeli PM are both at wits end trying to reach some sort of compromise but can not do so because of the stubborn nature of Netanyahu.

Killing the deal makes no sense as deal itself is quite elaborate and understandable why Obama let it pass.

Obama wants this to be his legacy and it will be if it passes, for better or worse. Plus Obama also has the backing of major co operations which can not hurt.

These people are just pro-Israel, they can't see an Iran with no sanctions. This was the best deal that could be achieved by two parties. Overall just making a facade, nothing much.

Yes the pro Israel lobby is very much at work here, and the congress has many members which are blatantly pro Israel. They are trying in every way to sabotage the deal because they fear Irani influence in the region.

Still better than Donald Trump

Trump is a shot in the arm for the American system, he can not win but is going to say things that need to be said. His ratings are not that bad to be honest, leading the Republican nominations. He seems to understand that catering to every minority while ignoring the majority is something that would not work for his image, thus he is being provocative, idiotic and doing all he can to stand out. He is independently wealthy which is why he does not need all the funds other campaigners accumulate and that seems attractive to some voters.
(Using Regan every chance he gets is not hurting either)

 

[WAJsal]

It will work temporarily, but the consequences will be dire for the whole region. It is not difficult to target military and atomic installations but it will cause massive retributions and destabilise the Middle east further.
Israel is the one who is going to try something as a last ditch effort if things do not go their way for some time. Obama and the Israeli PM are both at wits end trying to reach some sort of compromise but can not do so because of the stubborn nature of Netanyahu.

Don't think the US will risk something like this. Well said will only further destabilize the region.

Yes the pro Israel lobby is very much at work here, and the congress has many members which are blatantly pro Israel. They are trying in every way to sabotage the deal because they fear Irani influence in the region.

Over obsession.

 

[Gufi]

Over obsession.

Fear is used as a weapon very well for the people

 

[bdslph]

this are the real terrorist

Iran deal is safe for USA Israel and westerner

 

[Sine Nomine]

Unfortunately there is a lot of Propaganda in Pakistan where they are putting the blame of Lashkar-e-Jhangvi/Tehrik-e-Taliban etc. upon Iran.

1) Reality is this these Takfiri Sunni Extremists are all over the world. Even in Europe. Even in Saudia itself.

2) These Takfiri Sunni Extremists are not only killing Shias, but also killing Barailvi Sunni Muslims, Hindus, Christian and Ahmadies in Pakistan.

3) It was Pakistani Government/ Army (not People) itself, who gave birth to Taliban of Afghanistan along with US and Saudia. This was the mistake of Pakistani Government. This Pakistani act hurt Iran badly.
But this didn't only hurt Iran, but it hurt Pakistan itself.
This same ideology of Taliban came back to Pakistan in form of Tehrik-e-Taliban and killed thousands of Pak Army soldiers and thousands of Qabaili Pakistani citizens.

Go through that thread kid...............
Debunking Afghan Myths and Lies

 

[Saifullah]

America will be fool to do that and i hope Pakistan will support iran, they are our brothers.

 

[yavar]

i can't wait till one of these get to the white house .
can't wait . we pray and hope to see him as president U.S.

after election of one these big mouth then maybe the Pak with their tactical Atom bombs and Turk will understand better .

 

[Aramagedon]

after election of one these big mouth then maybe the Pak with their tactical Atom bombs and Turk will understand better .

What do u mean bro?

 

[mohsen]

and some other words from democrat Obama:

اوباما: ایران، یک رژیم دین‌سالار بی‌رحم و حامی تروریسم است/ ایران به هر سایتی دسترسی ندهد تحریم ها بر می گردد/ طبق توافق ایران نمی تواند حزب الله را تسلیح کند

for internal consumption, right?

 

[kamrananvaar]

Jul. 23, 2015 4:14pm

If Congress doesn’t kill the Iran nuclear deal, the next president will have two choices, Texas Sen. Ted Cruz said after attending a rally in front of the White House opposed to the deal.

“Any commander in chief worth his salt should be prepared on the first day of his presidency to repudiate this disastrous deal,” Cruz told TheBlaze Thursday. “The next president in all likelihood will enter the Oval Office and be informed that he or she has one of two choices: Either acquiesce in allowing Iran to acquire nuclear weapons because Iran is likely to be on the verge of acquiring nuclear weapons due to President Obama’s catastrophic nuclear deal; or two, use direct military force to prevent that from happening.”


Republican presidential candidate Sen. Ted Cruz debates the Iran nuclear deal with Code Pink co-founder Medea Benjamin during a rally in Lafayette Square, July 23, 2015 in Washington. The rally, organized by Concerned Women for America, was held to protest the recent nuclear deal reached between the United States and Iran but was interrupted by protesters from Code Pink who support the deal. (Win McNamee/Getty Images)

The 2016 Republican presidential candidate called on a crowd at Lafayette Square, across the street from the White House, to light up the phone lines of members of Congress to get a veto-proof majority to vote down the deal.

“Front and center in 2016 is going to be a discussion about how we protect this nation,” Cruz said. “It is going to be a major issue, in the 2016 campaign in the primary, and in the general election as well, and Hillary Clinton will have the opportunity to explain to the American people why she is OK with a nuclear Iran. I think it poses an existential threat to Israel and an enormous threat to the United States of America.”

Concerned Women for America organized the rally, which included several speakers, including Cruz. White House press secretary Josh Earnest referred to the event as a “pro-war rally.”

“All opponents of the deal will have the opportunity to explain why they would oppose the best way for us to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon and that is through diplomacy,” Earnest told reporters.

A contingent from the anti-war group Code Pink sought to crash the rally and shout down Cruz.

The Code Pink chants of “war monger, war monger” were mostly drowned out by shouts of “We want Ted.” But the sign-waving crowds on both sides were surprised when Cruz invited one someone from the group to speak. “You want to yell and scream, come forward,” Cruz said. Watch the full exchange here.

The event turned into a point-counterpoint at the microphone between the 2016 presidential candidate and Code Pink co-founder Medea Benjamin, who said “it is absolutely false” that Iran wants to develop a nuclear weapon. Benjamin added, “We are surrounded by zealots here who would rather have war in the Middle East.”

Cruz answered each of her questions, and neither convinced the other. But the shouting settled.

“I don’t want peace at the price of millions of Americans,” Cruz said.

Asked about his motivation for getting into a debate with Code Pink, Cruz told TheBlaze he believes in the First Amendment.

“I think it is unfortunate when you see protesters try to shout down speech, I don’t think that is an appropriate way to persuade you’re fellow citizens,” Cruz said. “They have passionate views and I was willing to engage with them and discuss it on the merits, and I hope some of the discussion caused them to reconsider facts that they believed in were not accurate.”

Much of the rally was based on why the United States did not seek the release of four Americans held in Iran. Though that was not part of the deal, President Barack Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry have repeatedly said they are doing everything they can to get the prisoners free.

Asked if he believes that, Cruz told TheBlaze “no.”

“Actions speak louder than words,” Cruz said. “The president can’t bring himself to utter their names. When the president announced this deal, nowhere in his remarks were found the words Pastor Saeed Abedini, Amir Hekmati, Jason Rezaian, Robert Levinson. If he will not speak their names, it is of no surprise that they have not been released.”

Ted Cruz Says the Next President Will Have Two Choices: Allow Iran to Get Nukes, or Send in the Military | Video | TheBlaze.com

Oh plz send in the military and the afghanistan defeat will look like a walk in the park . Iran will teach you a lesson that you will never forget . Remember iran iraq war the proxy war that usa and rest of the world sponsored??? The us economy will definately take a nose dive and like ussr we will have 52 new countries

 

[Uzair Shafiq [Босс]]

If they bomb iran we should back iran and defend iran Just remember what the quran says about brotherhood And if iran falls(god forbid) just remember we will be cornered