Targeting Indian Oil Refineries

[GumNaam]

@Rashid Mahmood @HRK @Horus @MastanKhan

How would India protect it's offshore oil rigs, if they were targeted with stand off weapons / cruise missiles?

dude, they couldn't even protect their own chef of army staff ("chef" ain't a typo, I mean, c'mon...just look at him)! you think they'll be able to protect oil fields regardless of offshore or on land???

 

[Knight Rider]

Israel has gained territories & still holding them & Israel's economy has grown & is stronger than it's neighbors in-spite of surrounded by enemies & tensions. No comparison with Pak - Go see the forex reserves of Israel & it's bigger neighbors or yours with Israel & India.

You have lost territories & you are going down & down after every war. That's exactly what India wants - We already have won all wars & also broke BD. We should not go into full fledged war unless Pakistan has the balls to escalate which you cannot, because we know what you have jamuns not b@lls

Till then keep Pak engaged in small skirmishes, LOC, internal chaos, FATF & isolation, so people like you have hatred & terrorists go mad over India. The loans taken by Gov. has to go the Military & security than development so the people will keep raising like in the videos below, as you have to use force to control them, adding to our advantage without our interference.

We have to focus on the many fault lines you have like Baloch, Ahmedias, Mohajirs, Shias, Sindhis & Pashtuns who in turn will work on the so called balls of Pak.

Such threads started like target Mumbai, oil refineries shows, we are winning as the hatred is increasing in Pak minds for India. Imran Khan should be able to successfully take the PKR beyond 200 before his term ends hopefully. And when cost of living goes out of control, which will in next 1-2 years, there is going to be chaos making such minds like you or the OP go mad in jealousy, why India still growing & getting stronger. So someone will get carried away to carry out a terror attack in India. That will give us more mileage in the international forum to strike again & leading to break up.

You make me laugh . We already beaten you 2 times and we can start kargal any day any time without even giving you any hint of war. Doing Propaganda on balochi people !!! 75% of indians want freedom including Sikhs and Assam people but we will give the Sikhs Khalistan first in 2020. About israelis we will given the chosen people a bloody nose even if they have alien technology after we beat you and our economy is in the right hand right now (Thank you Imran Khan). We have more oil reserves then the Arabs and Russian combined due to latest discovery by Exxon Mobile and which can last for the coming 100 years according to Exxon Mobile sources. After the upcoming American empire collapse due to civil war in 2019 or 2020 and dollar is history we gone use these resources and seek full advantage out of them.
Imran Khan will make Pakistan great again and that Pakistan which Muhammad Ali Jinnah wanted.

 

[American Pakistani]

In case of indian terrorism and aggression against Pakistan, Pakistan should definitely bring these refineries down.

 

[HRK]

@Rashid Mahmood @HRK @Horus @MastanKhan
@Tps43 @Signalian

How would India protect it's offshore oil rigs, if they were targeted with stand off weapons / cruise missiles?

they have enough assets available for the purpose but in my opinion early warning will play a crucial role to defend this installation therefore the role of P-8i is most important in this task

 

[God Parshuram]

First of all the figures you gave are not correct. Second, Essar refinery Jamnagar is taken over by a Russian company which has a substantial investment of Vladimir Putin. Essar now has only two percentage stake in Jamnagar i refinery. so make a choice. Do you want to go against Vladimir Putin. Are you ready to face the consequences?

 

[khail007]

you are right. The truth is, india dies have the most to lose from war, even if Pakistan is hurt more. So such scenarios are unlikely thankfully.

At least, we have some understanding that war only bring destruction - to some it is less and to some more. Pakistan's economy already in bad shape and India's at strong footings.
The people and politicians of both countries to understand the solutions to core issues which are causing wars is must. It will give less reasons of disagreement and more for reconciliation. The key to happiness in the region.

 

[CodeforFood]

If that is the case, why were you unable to take Kashmir in 47, 65, or 99, when we successfully defended our territory against Pakistani aggression? and you are aware we have missiles tw0? And there is nothing you can do to protect Karachi from an assault by the IN. think about that before you entertain such fantasies.

Oh, and let's say you have the capability to hit Gujarati oil refineries and you actually have the balls to do that(which is unlikely given how many of you surrendered in 71). in that case, we will simply move our strategic oil reserves to refineries in Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesn, Odisha, and the Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Then what will you do?

I think in 47 - 48 Pakistan did take a lot of Kashmir, that is called Azad kashmir and that was by force. Also when you talk about karachi refineries, don't forget what happened to dwarka in 65...
oh and yes in 99, I believe Pakistan still occupies some of the peaks taken during 99 operation.

 

[Cobra Arbok]

I think in 47 - 48 Pakistan did take a lot of Kashmir, that is called Azad kashmir and that was by force. Also when you talk about karachi refineries, don't forget what happened to dwarka in 65...
oh and yes in 99, I believe Pakistan still occupies some of the peaks taken during 99 operation.

Kashmir was not even a part of India at that time. It was a princely state. By the time it acceded to India, the Pakistani Army/tribesman had already conquered Pakistani Kashmir and GB. However, as soon as the IA arrived Pakistan was pushed back, and Srinagar, Jammu, and Ladakh was saved. And as for Kargil, no you don't. If you did, you would be able to cut off the Siachen highway. Yet it is still operational. However, wee still occupy several of your peaks(4381 5310, 3770).

 

[Vortex]

Wars are fought economically in this era.
Not with weapons.

Stuxnet is a weapon without being a weapon. Or any other ransomware could do the job.

 

[Ultima Thule]

If Pakistan could survive 10 days in war after blockade, then it is substanical if it destroys refineries. But the practicality of it is doubtful. These refineries have heavy Saudi - UAE investments and India being second largest importer of crude oil after China I don't think Pakistan will ever try such a stunt. Besides, we gave SPR that could give us a 10 day time before the fuels are exhausted.

You can't blockage us in front of these

CM-400AKG

HARPPON

ZARB

EXOCET

HARBA

C-802

C-803

​

@Chhatrapati

 

[Vortex]

@pakistanipower i hope they have a sailor having same moustache as Abhinandan in their navy.

Just for ISPR could troll the Indians.

 

[Ultima Thule]

@pakistanipower i hope they have a sailor having same moustache as Abhinandan in their navy.

Just for ISPR could troll the Indians.

a good one bro and on the spot

 

[Hamza913]

Navy can be deployed against either Pakistan or China and Indians coasts would still be secure.

The Indian Air force would also be enough to confront any PAF vessel that attempts to target the Jamnagar refinery.

They weren't enough to stop Roses and Thunders from bombing your territory.

I repeat, Flankers, M-2000s, Bisons and anti-air defences couldn't stop a few Roses and Thunders from bombing your country and taking out your aircraft. You may have even accidentally shot down one of your own.

Although we did blow up Karachi's oil refineries in 71.

And the PAF blew the sh!t out of Onka harbour in response. And let's not forget about the humiliation at Dwarka that happened in 1965, your navy became too much of a b!tch to even participate after that mess.

Anyway, we don't need to use the navy or the air force, we can just send some missiles your way and let Durrani, Ghaznavi and Ghauri work their magic a 2nd time.

If that is the case, why were you unable to take Kashmir in 47

We took over 1/3 of it in 1947, I don't know how you can possibly consider that an Indian victory when you lost such a large chunk of it and the part that you do have is draining your military of so many resources.

65

We ended up capturing more land than India did and halted it's invasion in little over two weeks. There's no way you can spin that as some sort of victory without blatantly lying.

99

Taking Kashmir wasn't the objective. And we still operate Point 5353 to this very day, the region's dominating feature.

which is unlikely given how many of you surrendered in 71

Outnumbered 15:1, and didn't even suffer 1% of the casualties the Indians/Bengalis did. But if you guys want to celebrate that, be my guest. The rest of the world remembers it as a Hindu holocaust.

NUCLEAR BLUFF has been TRASHED

It will only be trashed when India has the balls to invade Pakistan after burning so many of it's soldiers in Kashmir.

Until then, just sit down and continue to take the L.

 

[Cobra Arbok]

They weren't enough to stop Roses and Thunders from bombing your territory.

I repeat, Flankers, M-2000s, Bisons and anti-air defences couldn't stop a few Roses and Thunders from bombing your country and taking out your aircraft. You may have even accidentally shot down one of your own.



And the PAF blew the sh!t out of Onka harbour in response. And let's not forget about the humiliation at Dwarka that happened in 1965, your navy became too much of a b!tch to even participate after that mess.

Anyway, we don't need to use the navy or the air force, we can just send some missiles your way and let Durrani, Ghaznavi and Ghauri work their magic a 2nd time.

Actually, you are right about Onka. As I have said before, the PAF has consistently overperformed throughout the Indo-Pak wars compared to the IAF, which has always been the weakest link of the Indian military. Conversely, the PN is the weakest link to yours, and this thread was supposed to be primarily about Naval attacks against oil refineries. Although, Karachi is significantly more important to Pakistan than Onka is to India.
As for Dwarka, the Indian Navy in 65 was nothing like it is today. It was not until the Gandhi era that India seriously invested in it Navy. And the results of that investment are clear, given the IN's performance agiasnt the PN in 71.

Also, India was not expecting an attack at Dwarka because there was no military facility at Dwarka. Dwarka is nothing but a religiously sacred town. Attacking Dwarka was only to boost public morale after the PA was losing on the ground. No military targets were hit, because there were none. I heard you managed to damage a temple though, so congratulations.

As for those missiles, Pakistan can definitely use them. But you realize we have all that and much more, right? As well as missie defense capabilities. The induction of S-400 in 2020 will be a game changer in that regard. But I sure hope you are not seriously fantasizing about that situation.

 

[Riz]

Pakistanis are forgetting about the Indian Coast Guard. The ICG has been developed so that the entire Navy can be deployed against either Pakistan or China and Indians coasts would still be secure. The Indian Air force would also be enough to confront any PAF vessel that attempts to target the Jamnagar refinery.

Our navy have 1k km range anti ship cruise missiles.. This time we will destroy your whole navy with in your own waters.....u cant surprise us but we will... Must remember DGISPR statement