Mootaz-khelifi
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2012
- Messages
- 1,507
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
these is not a Tank i's Self-propelled artillery
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
these is not a Tank i's Self-propelled artillery
That is not a XK2, it is K1A1 MBTSouth Korean XK-2 Black Panther and K-9 Thunder MBT
four vehicles, each with a different configurations,
T-80UD Americans sold by Ukraine. The 4 copies came in different setsWe: 3 with APS and other equipment with air conditioning available. The agreement was signed a few years ago, but the appearance of the photos has a good discussion Caused Between Russians and Ukrainians, Who Have called clowns, traitors, accomplices and a long etcetera.
A photo of a T-80UD Pakistani maneuvers. According andrei-bt.livejournal.com, thermal cameras these tanks were built in Ukraine
Photo of a T-80 Cyprus. Apart Shtora system have Catherine-E thermal cameras
Consider the results of tests performed by a prototype T-80 (Object 219), a T-64A and T-72:
- Average speed of 1.3 compared to T-64A/72.
- Time to complete a 1000kms up 1.5 times lower.
- After the march was a journey on a slope of 15 °, the Object 219 was two times faster.
- Number of maintenance 5 times lower.
- Habitability 2-3 times. The lower smoke and noise allowed to operate better with BMP, and the attack could be performed at twice the speed.
- Effective fire distance 1.3 times.
- Time to prepare the first shot 2.1 times lower.
- Time to prepare the engine at low temperature 8-10 times lower.
- Acceleration time 1.7 times less (does not say what speed).
- Accuracy 1.3-1.5 times greater.
- Time resupply 2.5-3 times lower. You can use helicopter fuel. The cost of the fuel is 1.5 times lower.
- The time to change the engine / transmission is the third.
- The length and complexity of maintenance is less than half.
More calculations performed by the Kirov plant, the defense ministry and the institute Minaviaproma:
- Probability of detection from the air 1.25-1.9 times lower.
- Time out of the contaminated area four times lower.
- Life of the motor 2 times greater.
- Using 1.5 times lower specific metals.
The T-72/64A consumed 4.5 liters / kms. The Object 219 6.2 l / km. GTD clear that the turbine is 1.251.4 times more potent than 5TDF or V-46. The protection was higher by using steel BTK-1:
Item 219:
Front tower: 500mm.
Chassis Front: 380mm.
T-72/64A:
Front tower: 410mm.
Chassis Front: 305mm.
In any case, we must not take everything at face value. These will likely be designed to see the virtues of the turbines, but have many drawbacks: they are much more expensive, more complex materials used and have a much lower life. In a circuit but may be lower when tested the Indians T-80U of the need for support vehicles was 3 times greater than in the T-90. The Russians argue that most of the time the extra power from the turbine is not used. In short, there are reasons for and against, but we must not forget that the Soviets ended up with a diesel version of the T-80, the UD.
The data come from:
http://andrei-bt.livejournal.com/25099.html
See if someone can correct or add to the translation.
Greetings