Taliban says India playing 'negative' role by supporting Kabul govt

[jamahir]

Destructive ideologies shouldn't be present anywhere.

The Maoist Naxalite movement in India is a bunch of disciplined and idealist people. I believe they should have peace talks with the Supreme Court. This would be like the FARC guerrilla movement in Columbia talking to the government.

They have no influence there otherwise they would have fought elections and won. That's how real world works.

I suppose what the SPA can do, like the AAP in Delhi, strive to take power in one city and improve it. But this has a chance of sabotage by the Americans and the Taliban.

We have to talk who have influence there, we can't use too much resources to turn around the power structures there when US couldn't succeed in the same.

India can do quite a bit really but chooses not to. You should read this article about how India messed up its plan to get President Najibullah to escape to India in 1992. The quoted part speaks of how the so-called Mujahideen saw India - not really as an enemy :

However, there were others in India who argued that giving Najibullah asylum would further antagonise the Mujahideen leadership, something that India should avoid. The assumption was that once the anger settled, the Mujahideen would not throw away a beneficial relationship with India

 

[xyx007]

In such fifth-generation warfare, there's a lot of propaganda spreading against the Taliban. We all knew who is in panic and involve in spreading such fake Newj

https://twitter.com/x/status/1261547924384649216

There's propaganda spreading on behalf of Taliban : We all know who is in panic and spreading such Newj
"since 40 years Afgnistan sees the filthy face(supportive of two superpower invasion) of India. India has always played a negative role and supported the country’s traitors.
the Afghan Taliban have announced in a message that they will start a regular jihad in India after Eid-ul-Fitr.
Afghan Taliban have taken this decision due to the indiscriminate atrocities perpetrated on Muslims and other minorities by the RSS, BJP, and other similar terrorist organizations in India, besides the massacre of Kashmiris by India. Taliban have announced open revenge against Indians.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1261705831793524737

"


My Questions to India, are you still willing to take Azad Kashmir or create proxy inside of Pakistan against Bash Dam? or taking some notes from this article :
https://www.thehindu.com/news/inter...ith-taliban-say-observers/article31579780.ece
Hindutva Lungi is wet and now apporached to Pakistan from back door diplomacy
https://www.dawn.com/news/1557684/i...-delhi-feels-it-will-help-peace-push-pakistan

 

[Naofumi]

The Maoist Naxalite movement in India is a bunch of disciplined and idealist people. I believe they should have peace talks with the Supreme Court. This would be like the FARC guerrilla movement in Columbia talking to the government.

They don't solve anything, likes of Hemant Soren do a better job by choosing the democratic means.

I suppose what the SPA can do, like the AAP in Delhi, strive to take power in one city and improve it. But this has a chance of sabotage by the Americans and the Taliban.

Bhai waha democracy hoti to kisi bahar wale ke support ki zarurat hi kyo padti?

India can do quite a bit really but chooses not to. You should read this article about how India messed up its plan to get President Najibullah to escape to India in 1992. The quoted part speaks of how the so-called Mujahideen saw India - not really as an enemy :

1) Providing asylum don't change the political problems there, it only saves one life that may be detrimental to others in the country itself.
2) It was a good decision from India's point of view.

 

[aamirzs]

Good.

 

[jamahir]

1) Providing asylum don't change the political problems there, it only saves one life that may be detrimental to others in the country itself.

Najibullah was one life yes but he wanted to be outside of Afghanistan to be able to influence things within. Just before the previously quoted section is this :

Najibullah himself had earlier confided to Nambiar that he might be able to influence Afghan politics, however limitedly, from outside Afghanistan more than from the inside, in the face of the Soviet disintegration. The remaining secular and nationalist elements of the Hizb-e-Watan, it was calculated, would remain in Afghanistan and be represented in a coalition government that the UN was trying to cobble together.

2) It was a good decision from India's point of view.

The Taliban tortured Najibullah ( and his brother ) to death, dragged his corpse around Kabul and hanged it in a square for all to see. All this happened because the Indian embassy did not give him refuge after his escape plan failed. How was this a good decision ?

They don't solve anything, likes of Hemant Soren do a better job by choosing the democratic means.

How ?

Bhai waha democracy hoti to kisi bahar wale ke support ki zarurat hi kyo padti?

Like things are going, it can only mean a government controlled by USA from outside and Taliban from inside. What with the Western peace talks with Taliban and all.

 

[Naofumi]

Najibullah was one life yes but he wanted to be outside of Afghanistan to be able to influence things within. Just before the previously quoted section is this :

It was his opinion, I don't think it was likely. Shah of Iran too ran away and wasn't able to influence anything.

The Taliban tortured Najibullah ( and his brother ) to death, dragged his corpse around Kabul and hanged it in a square for all to see. All this happened because the Indian embassy did not give him refuge after his escape plan failed. How was this a good decision ?

The Mujahids were influencing Kashmir's situation, they would have declared full scale war on India in case of asylum. I know it was ethically wrong but we have to think realpolitik.

How ?

https://www.hrw.org/reports/2008/india0708/5.htm
Read this, naxals only makes other's life difficult. Hemant Soren is himself a tribal and can act on their wishes,

Like things are going, it can only mean a government controlled by USA from outside and Taliban from inside. What with the Western peace talks with Taliban and all.

US would have no control after withdrawal, India should keep distance from the coming mess.

 

[Pakistani Fighter]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1261547924384649216

since 40 years Afgnistan sees the filthy face(supportive of two superpower invasion) of India. India has always played a negative role and supported the country’s traitors.
the Afghan Taliban have announced in a message that they will start a regular jihad in India after Eid-ul-Fitr. Inshallah.
Afghan Taliban have taken this decision due to the indiscriminate atrocities perpetrated on Muslims and other minorities by the RSS, BJP, and other similar terrorist organizations in India, besides the massacre of Kashmiris by India. Taliban have announced open revenge against Indians.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1261705831793524737

21s Ramzan this announcement also sends a clear message that the Afghan Taliban will launch a regular jihad in India after Eid and account for all atrocities perpetrated by extremist Hindus.Inshallah.

My Questions to India, are you still willing to take Azad Kashmir or create proxy inside of Pakistan against Bash Dam? or taking some notes from this article :
https://www.thehindu.com/news/inter...ith-taliban-say-observers/article31579780.ece
Tera Kiya Hoga Kalia. We can see New Delhi has been terrified after this announcement. and Hindutva Lungi is wet and now apporached to Pakistan from back door diplomcy
https://www.dawn.com/news/1557684/i...-delhi-feels-it-will-help-peace-push-pakistan

Its fake

 

[Basel]

@Irfan Baloch @waz @Imran Khan @MastanKhan @Arsalan @Maarkhoor

 

[NeonNinja]

fake news dear

 

[Dil_Pakistan]

Seems to me like a fake news.
This seems more like a ploy by India to put the blame of resistance in Kashmir and elsewhere on the Talibans who they will claim are supported by Pakistan.
Earlier too there was a buzz that India is planning to have some ISIS type outfit in Kashmir who basically they try to associate with Taliban which clearly it isn't and ultimately put blame on Pakistan. Then it could be used for propaganda or false flag operation etc.

 

[TOPGUN]

Oh india if is this is true then you are in for a treat, evil meets evil

 

[Irfan Baloch]

View attachment 633185 View attachment 633186 View attachment 633187 View attachment 633188

@Irfan Baloch @waz @Imran Khan @MastanKhan @Arsalan @Maarkhoor

Afghan taliban had diplomatic relations with india during their Afghan rule.
India and Afghan Taliban might have talks regarding Afghanistan peace.

Afghan taliban will avoid any action that jeopardizes the peace and their plan to join Afghan government.

Seems to me like a fake news.
This seems more like a ploy by India to put the blame of resistance in Kashmir and elsewhere on the Talibans who they will claim are supported by Pakistan.
Earlier too there was a buzz that India is planning to have some ISIS type outfit in Kashmir who basically they try to associate with Taliban which clearly it isn't and ultimately put blame on Pakistan. Then it could be used for propaganda or false flag operation etc.

fake news

Afghan taliban never went beyond their country

if at all they had started a war outside then it would have been against Pakistan fir siding with Americans and capturing their leadership.

 

[Gentelman]

Odd, very odd and sudden..
Lets wait for confirmation...

 

[Rank]

Bull shit... we are damaging Taliban's image more than Indians.

This is false propaganda against the Taliban's and their narrative. It doesn’t make any sense. They’re fighting a war against Americans for almost two decades. They have fought against Russians for many years but they never ever attacked them outside IB (in any country except Afghanistan). That is completely against their motive, agenda, narrative, and objectives. There is no evidence who took that interview and where? Who was the spokesperson?

These kinds of news usually comes from India (without mentioning actual source).

Why we are so happy or love to share this kind of information? you know why? because from our perspective, it hurts India. Let's assume if I will going to change the title of this news from "Afghan Taliban announced to Start Jihad Against India" to "Afghan Taliban announced to start Jihad Against India on behalf of Pakistan" or "Afghan Taliban announced to Start Jihad Against India with Pakistan", we probably never ever share this news because it will against our interests (bring a bad name to us that we are involved in terrorism against India or we are supporting Taliban on this).

This is basic in today's information warfare to make headlines that attract your adversary and its people. Once they start sharing it, that will easy for your opponent to link if something happened later on.

It is easy to cross-verify such information.

1. Always figure-out who will be the real beneficiary of news at the end of the day.
2. What history tells us about the subject and object both. For instance, in this case, have Taliban ever attacked outside their borders before?
3. What if something happened, who gonna have a win-win situation? for instance, in this case, India will link the Afghan Taliban with Pakistan because we are pretending to be a phuppi of Taliban everywhere whether Afghan War or Afghan US peace dialog. It's easy for India after establishing this information as correct, conduct false flag on the name of Afghan Talibans meanwhile relate Pakistan to the attack because "OUR PEOPLE WERE EXCITED TO SHARE THIS EVERY WHERE"

 

[Imran Khan]

View attachment 633185 View attachment 633186 View attachment 633187 View attachment 633188

@Irfan Baloch @waz @Imran Khan @MastanKhan @Arsalan @Maarkhoor

seems fake news to me dear