What's new

Taliban calls on Afghan forces to attack Dutch troops stationed in Afghanistan for blasphemy

Farkhunda was an Afghan woman who in 2015 was killed brutally by a lynch mob which alleged that she had burned a Quran. Read her case here.
That was indeed a sad thing to happen!!!
but....a Gangadeshi talking about mob-lynching is something.....simply wow
that's shows how biased the media is that focusses on a single incident happened in Afghanistan like more than 20 years ago...
But ignoring dozens of lynching happened in your Gangadesh just in a single year and too just recently...

An art started and perfected by saffron chaddies... who lynch people even for their food...that's a next level. And as they say charity begins at home. You should be ashamed of pointing fingers at other before getting your house in order....until then STFU...
 
.
That was indeed a sad thing to happen!!!
but....a Gangadeshi talking about mob-lynching is something.....simply wow
that's shows how biased the media is that focusses on a single incident happened in Afghanistan like more than 20 years ago...
But ignoring dozens of lynching happened in your Gangadesh just in a single year and too just recently...

An art started and perfected by saffron chaddies... who lynch people even for their food...that's a next level. And as they say charity begins at home. You should be ashamed of pointing fingers at other before getting your house in order....until then STFU...

1. I am an internationalist but if you prefer "Gangadeshi" for me then that's okay and that's your misunderstanding.

2. Which biased media did I quote??

3. The Farkhunda case happened not 20 years ago but three years ago.

4. I have never supported any lynching in India.
 
.
1. I am an internationalist but if you prefer "Gangadeshi" for me then that's okay and that's your misunderstanding.

2. Which biased media did I quote??

3. The Farkhunda case happened not 20 years ago but three years ago.

4. I have never supported any lynching in India.
Talibans are millions of times better than those who kill people just for fun
 
.
1. I am an internationalist but if you prefer "gangadeshi" for me then that's okay and that's your misunderstanding.
hmmmm

2. Which biased media did I quote??
this one

3. The Farkhunda case happened not 20 years ago but three years ago.
Then what it has to do with Taliban? They are not in power.

4. I have never supported any lynching in India.
But you stayed silent as far as I remember, I never saw you speak against it either..may be you're afraid for your and your family's life and security.
 
.
Talibans are millions of times better than those who kill people just for fun

But the Taliban used to publicly flog those people who ran barber shops and music stores, and they would publicly execute people for adultery charges.


Sorry, which one??

Then what it has to do with Taliban? They are not in power.

But they created a culture where such mob rule is acceptable. This wouldn't have been allowed during the time of rule of the socialists.

But you stayed silent as far as I remember, I never saw you speak against it either..may be you're afraid for your and your family's life and security.

You are partially correct.

Besides that, not every right-winger is a permanent right-winger. Some of them are sensible but are simply caught within circumstances. The idea is to appeal to the humanity within them and this cannot happen with constant condemnation of them. For example, during the Libya war of 2011, the Jamahiri forces when encountering rebels ( actual Libyans ) would appeal to them to throw down their weapons and surrender. Some of the rebels did not listen to the appeal and fired upon the Jamahiri forces and this was one of the reasons that so many green ( jamahiri ) forces lost their lives.
 
Last edited:
. .
But the Taliban used to publicly flog those people who ran barber shops and music stores, and they would publicly execute people for adultery charges.
Their country, their rules...none of our business.

But they created a culture where such mob rule is acceptable. This wouldn't have been allowed during the time of rule of the socialists.
Mob might be present to see the punishment but the verdict is given by a court. Socialists killed more people than the rest combined.

You are partially correct.

I realized last year that one can also change things by getting into a position of influence, silently.

Besides that, not every right-winger is a permanent right-winger. Some of them are sensible but are simply caught within circumstances. The idea is to appeal to the humanity within them and this cannot happen with constant condemnation of them. For example, during the Libya war of 2011, the Jamahiri forces when encountering rebels ( actual Libyans ) would appeal to them to throw down their weapons and surrender. Some of the rebels did not listen to the appeal and fired upon the Jamahiri forces and this was one of the reasons that so many green ( jamahiri ) forces lost their lives.
Wow can this logic be extended to other extremists as well?
 
.
Their country, their rules...none of our business.

There are many Afghans too who don't wish to see Taliban rule again. For example, the Solidarity Party of Afghanistan. which is a socialist movement. Yes, a mid-sized socialist movement in present-day Afghanistan.

Mob might be present to see the punishment but the verdict is given by a court.

The wikipedia page I gave you the link of, it says that the police tried to save Farkhunda but didn't succeed because of the raging and numerically more mob. Read the wiki page again.

It is the Taliban which makes mob-rule be present in Afghan society. Remove the Taliban and the former so-called Mujahids and one will have a fresh Afghanistan.

Socialists killed more people than the rest combined.

Incorrect.

Wow can this logic be extended to other extremists as well?

Quite a few Syrian rebels ( Syrians, not foreign terrorists ) have laid down their arms and been given a new life by the Syrian government.
 
Last edited:
.
Just to be clear, These Talib f@gs want to ask the troops where are they from and then attack the Dutch ones?! :crazy:
 
.
There are many Afghans too which don't wish to see Taliban rule again. For example, the Solidarity Party of Afghanistan. which is a socialist movement. Yes, a mid-sized socialist movement in present-day Afghanistan.



The wikipedia page I gave you the link of, it says that the police tried to save Farkhunda but didn't succeed because of the raging and numerically more mob. Read the wiki page again.

It is the Taliban which makes mob-rule be present in Afghan society. Remove the Taliban and the former so-called Mujahids and one will have a fresh Afghanistan.



Incorrect.



Quite a few Syrian rebels ( Syrians, not foreign terrorists ) have laid down their arms and been given a new life by the Syrian government.
Yeah but do not forget that there are many Afghans who do support the Afghan Taliban....it is a civil conflict with NATO stirring up the usual . . .
 
.
Yeah but do not forget that there are many Afghans who do support the Afghan Taliban....it is a civil conflict with NATO stirring up the usual . . .

Well, such Afghans are like the Pakistanis who support the Lal Masjid gang. Would you support such people ??
 
.
Well, such Afghans are like the Pakistanis who support the Lal Masjid gang. Would you support such people ??
Lal masjid gang is nothing like Taliban. Taliban were the government of Afghanistan and were overthrown by a foreign occupation and they are fighting for freedom from those foreign powers.

Lal masjid 'Gang' was made up of some pointless mullah ideology who wanted to ban everything and were kidnapping and killing people and blocking roads while no one in Pakistan wanted them. Unlike Taliban, where more than half of the country's population supports them.
 
.
Lal masjid gang is nothing like Taliban. Taliban were the government of Afghanistan and were overthrown by a foreign occupation and they are fighting for freedom from those foreign powers.

Lal masjid 'Gang' was made up of some pointless mullah ideology who wanted to ban everything and were kidnapping and killing people and blocking roads while no one in Pakistan wanted them. Unlike Taliban, where more than half of the country's population supports them.

1. Just because there are more than half of a country's population supporting an ideology, doesn't make them right. If they were correct, every lynch mob attacking a lone person would have been correct, whether in India or in Afghanistan. Read about the case of the murder of an Afghan woman, Farkhunda, who was brutally killed by a lynch mob who outnumbered the police party which was trying to save her. Was the lynch mob correct just because they were numerically more than the police??

2. Like I said in a previous post on this thread, the Taliban is also a pointless Deobandi mullah ideology which during its time in government was doing silly things like banning barber shops and music stores, and executing people publicly on "adultery" charges and also banning women's education. The Taliban is a brutal movement which must be removed but I agree that some Talibanis were forced to enter the Taliban movement with offers of money or because they were forced.

3. Every progressive movement starts off with a few people or even a single person.
 
.
1. Just because there are more than half of a country's population supporting an ideology, doesn't make them right. If they were correct, every lynch mob attacking a lone person would have been correct, whether in India or in Afghanistan. Read about the case of the murder of an Afghan woman, Farkhunda, who was brutally killed by a lynch mob who outnumbered the police party which was trying to save her. Was the lynch mob correct just because they were numerically more than the police??

2. Like I said in a previous post on this thread, the Taliban is also a pointless Deobandi mullah ideology which during its time in government was doing silly things like banning barber shops and music stores, and executing people publicly on "adultery" charges and also banning women's education. The Taliban is a brutal movement which must be removed but I agree that some Talibanis were forced to enter the Taliban movement with offers of money or because they were forced.
Taliban would be wrong if there was another party or competition but when the locals see that its either the americans or the Taliban they support the Taliban.

And as for your comparison of mob mentality with the Taliban, where did that murder happen? In American backed government area. Crime rate is almost zero in areas under Taliban and now they are allowing girls to attend school

Im not saying Taliban is the best for Afg but if I was there I would also choose to support someone who fights foreign occupation.
 
.
Lal masjid gang is nothing like Taliban. Taliban were the government of Afghanistan and were overthrown by a foreign occupation and they are fighting for freedom from those foreign powers.

Lal masjid 'Gang' was made up of some pointless mullah ideology who wanted to ban everything and were kidnapping and killing people and blocking roads while no one in Pakistan wanted them. Unlike Taliban, where more than half of the country's population supports them.
You are putting the idiot troll in his place..
 
.
Back
Top Bottom