Taliban announce women must cover faces in public, say burqa is best

[unrequitted_love_suzy]

Taliban order Afghan women to cover faces again

The move is a return to a signature policy of their past hardline rule.

www.reuters.com

 

[WotTen]

We need to build a thick WALL between Pakistan and Afghanistan.

I feel sorry for the Afghan women but Pakistan has enough problems without these nutjobs next door.

 

[unrequitted_love_suzy]

We need to build a thick WALL between Pakistan and Afghanistan.

I feel sorry for the Afghan women but Pakistan has enough problems without these nutjobs next door.

we need to build a wall all around afbanistan.

 

[jamahir]

Muskan bibi of India will be proud :

 

[War Thunder]

We need to build a thick WALL between Pakistan and Afghanistan.

I feel sorry for the Afghan women but Pakistan has enough problems without these nutjobs next door.

I hope you feel the same about our women prostituting in front of other men with the common revealing wear in Pakistan, not to say anything they wear in countries outside Pakistan.
What the Taliban are doing is extreme, women are required to wear Hijab and as per some interpretations, to wear Niqab when around men who are not their husband, father or brothers.
So definitely the covering of the whole face is something on the extreme end and definitely not what is required in Islam and has more to do with the Pashtoon culture which is mostly based on ignorance.
But what our "Muslim" women end up wearing in general where the curves on their bodies are all visible and where they are wearing make up and going out in front of men who do not qualify the above-mentioned, are just as ridiculous and extreme and have nothing to do with Islam.

Muskan bibi of India will be proud :

She is wearing Niqab which is required of her being a Muslim when she steps out in front of strange men.
It's not the same as a full face cover which Afghans force their women to wear.

You must be ashamed of your lack of knowledge on the faith you "claim" to follow.

 

[Azadkashmir]

Muskan bibi of India will be proud :

she should be, india has cases of corona need mask which she is wearing, good on her.

 

[jamahir]

She is wearing Niqab which is required of her being a Muslim when she steps out in front of strange men.

It is not. The burqa / niqab / etc is a Jewish garment with nothing to do with Islam.

she should be, india has cases of corona need mask which she is wearing, good on her.

Fine, let her wear the mask but she should discard that black burqa. If she doesn't do that then she is wearing the mask as a proxy niqab. Afghan females are kicking and burning the burqa in public protests in the fear kingdom of the Taliban, Pakistani females are taking out Aurat Marches to demand their right to have their female existence and then we have Angry Indian Burqa Girl Muskan, a misinformed and misguided girl.

 

[Mugen]

I am all for limiting indecency, but making burqa mandatory is going too far.

 

[Azadkashmir]

It is not. The burqa / niqab / etc is a Jewish garment with nothing to do with Islam.



Fine, let her wear the mask but she should discard that black burqa. If she doesn't do that then she is wearing the mask as a proxy niqab. Afghan females are kicking and burning the burqa in public protests in the fear kingdom of the Taliban, Pakistani females are taking out Aurat Marches to demand their right to have their female existence and then we have Angry Indian Burqa Girl Muskan, a misinformed and misguided girl.

you mean the black cloak? in pakistan we have cia funded groups manipulating ppl.
Pakistani women have plenty of rights we have had women prime minister, usa hasn't had female prime minister or president. india has radical crazy hindutva oppressing muslims.

i have been to pakistan women in those countries are riding motor cycles, going gym, driving cars/taxis, running shops, fashion etc more than muslim women in britain.

as i say i go for sharia anytime if i lived in pakistan, if i was protected against imf debt/world bank, we have our own currency, no rothschilds, i am debt free. rather than be told am free but in debt n hungry no control of my resources, told pay taxes which will be misused, my land taken as to pay debt, my water taken by foreign corporations.

 

[War Thunder]

It is not. The burqa / niqab / etc is a Jewish garment with nothing to do with Islam.



Fine, let her wear the mask but she should discard that black burqa. If she doesn't do that then she is wearing the mask as a proxy niqab. Afghan females are kicking and burning the burqa in public protests in the fear kingdom of the Taliban, Pakistani females are taking out Aurat Marches to demand their right to have their female existence and then we have Angry Indian Burqa Girl Muskan, a misinformed and misguided girl.

LOL
Misinformed and misguided are the minority of Aurat March and Afghan Women who are burning their cover.
Do you think they represent Majority?
Or do you think these women in Aurat March have anything to do with Islam?

Why do you want to pass comments on how women or people follow Islam when you are the most ignorant and misinformed on Islam?
What exactly is stopping you from picking up the Quran and educating yourself?

It is not. The burqa / niqab / etc is a Jewish garment with nothing to do with Islam.

That's the most ignorant statement I have heard from the most ignorant person on this forum.
The Jews were asked to cover, just as the Christians and just as the Muslims.
You are telling me something that is clearly mentioned in Islam has nothing to do with Islam because your ignorant self can't be bothered to educate yourself by picking up the Quran and reading for yourself?

Why are misrepresenting Islam and spreading your harmful ignorance on a public platform and misguiding others?

 

[jamahir]

You are telling me something that is clearly mentioned in Islam has nothing to do with Islam because your ignorant self can't be bothered to educate yourself by picking up the Quran and reading for yourself?

Clearly where ?

The Jews were asked to cover, just as the Christians and just as the Muslims.

And why do you want to follow that Jewish custom which is irrational and anti-human ?

 

[jamahir]

you mean the black cloak? in pakistan we have cia funded groups manipulating ppl.

The first port of call for CIA to see if they can destabilize a Muslim-majority country is to see it CIA can collaborate with the mullahs there. This happened whether in Egypt during Nasser's time and later or in Pakistan or in Indonesia. It is not the Aurat March who are the CIA agents it is the mullahs.

i have been to pakistan women in those countries are riding motor cycles, going gym, driving cars/taxis, running shops, fashion etc more than muslim women in britain.

Well, the motorcycle as a vehicle should have been globally banned and when females ride it they seem to do it to feel equal to males in a perverse way so I don't like that. Secondly, gyms should be banned for females. The female body should be feminine, not hardened, thin, muscular etc.

I must inform you that India has the largest number of burqa wearers in the world and that has come about because of the brainwashings and societal pressures by the accursed Tableeghi Jamaat since the mid-2000s. This would be the same in Britain where the prominent "Muslim" looks like this which does quite cut a good image of Muslims and of Islam :

as i say i go for sharia anytime if i lived in pakistan, if i was protected against imf debt/world bank, we have our own currency, no rothschilds, i am debt free. rather than be told am free but in debt n hungry no control of my resources, told pay taxes which will be misused, my land taken as to pay debt, my water taken by foreign corporations.

This was what Pakistan's Mard-e-Momin Zia ul Haq did as part of his "Shariaization" :

In 1981 interest payments were replaced by "profit and loss" accounts (though profit was thought to be simply interest by another name).

So a sham really. If you want true Islamic socio-economics you should look at Communism or at least Socialism :

During the same period (1920s-30s), another (though lesser known) Islamic scholar in undivided India got smitten by the 1917 Russian revolution and Marxism.

Hafiz Rahman Sihwarwl saw Islam and Marxism sharing five elements in common: (1) prohibition of the accumulation of wealth in the hands of the privileged classes (2) organisation of the economic structure of the state to ensure social welfare (3) equality of opportunity for all human beings (4) priority of collective social interest over individual privilege and (5) prevention of the permanentising of class structure through social revolution.

The motivations for many of these themes he drew from the Qur’an, which he understood as seeking to create an economic order in which the rich pay excessive, though voluntary taxes (Zakat) to minimise differences in living standards.

In the areas that Sihwarwl saw Islam and communism diverge were Islam’s sanction of private ownership within certain limits, and in its refusal to recognise an absolutely classless basis of society.

He suggested that Islam, with its prohibition of the accumulation of wealth, is able to control the class structure through equality of opportunity.

Basically, both Sindhi and Sihwarwl had stumbled upon an Islamic concept of the social democratic welfare state.

Building upon the initial thoughts of Sindhi and Sihwarwl were perhaps South Asia’s two most ardent and articulate supporters and theoreticians of Islamic Socilaism: Ghulam Ahmed Parvez and Dr. Khalifa Abdul Hakim.

Parvez was a prominent ‘Quranist’, or an Islamic scholar who insisted that for the Muslims to make progress in the modern world, Islamic thought and laws should be entirely based on the modern interpretations of the Qu’ran and on the complete rejection of the hadith (sayings of the Prophet and his companions based on hearsay and compiled over a 100 years after the Prophet’s demise).

After studying traditional Muslim texts, as well as Sufism, Parvez claimed that almost all hadiths were fabrications by those who wanted Islam to seem like an intolerant faith and by ancient Muslim kings who used these hadiths to give divine legitimacy to their tyrannical rules.

Parvez also insisted that Muslims should spend more time studying the modern sciences instead of wasting their energies on fighting out ancient sectarian conflicts or ignoring the true egalitarian and enlightening spirit of the Qu’ran by indulging in multiple rituals handed down to them by ancient ulema, clerics and compilers of the hadith.

Understandably, Parvez was right away attacked by conservative Islamic scholars and political outfits.

But this didn’t stop famous Muslim philosopher and poet, Muhammad Iqbal, to befriend the young scholar and then introduce him to the future founder of Pakistan, Muhammad Ali Jinnah.

Jinnah appointed Parvez to edit a magazine, Talu-e-Islam. It was set-up to propagate the creation of a separate Muslim country and to also answer the attacks that Jinnah’s All India Muslim League had begun to face from conservative Islamic parties and ulema who accused the League of being a pseudo-Muslim organisation and Jinnah for being too westernised and ‘lacking correct Islamic behavior.’

Apart from continuing to author books and commentaries on the Qu’ran, Parvez wrote a series of articles in Talu-e-Islam that propagated a more socialistic view of the holy book.

In a series of essays for the magazine he used verses from the Qu’ran, incidents from the faith’s history and insights from the writings of Muhammad Iqbal to claim:

The clergy and conservative ulema have hijacked Islam.

They are agents of the rich people and promoters of uncontrolled Capitalism.

Socialism best enforces Qur’anic dictums on property, justice and distribution of wealth.

Islam’s main mission was the eradication of all injustices and cruelties from society. It was a socio-economic movement, and the Prophet was a leader seeking to put an end to the capitalist exploitation of the Quraysh merchants and the corrupt bureaucracy of Byzantium and Persia.

According to the Qur’an, Muslims have three main responsibilities: seeing, hearing and sensing through the agency of the mind. Consequently, real knowledge is based on empirically verifiable observation, or through the role of science.

Poverty is the punishment of God and deserved by those who ignore science.

In Muslim/Islamic societies, science, as well as agrarian reform should play leading roles in developing an industrialised economy.

A socialist path is a correction of the medieval distortion of Islam through Shari’a.

 

[Azadkashmir]

The first port of call for CIA to see if they can destabilize a Muslim-majority country is to see it CIA can collaborate with the mullahs there. This happened whether in Egypt during Nasser's time and later or in Pakistan or in Indonesia. It is not the Aurat March who are the CIA agents it is the mullahs.



Well, the motorcycle as a vehicle should have been globally banned and when females ride it they seem to do it to feel equal to males in a perverse way so I don't like that. Secondly, gyms should be banned for females. The female body should be feminine, not hardened, thin, muscular etc.

I must inform you that India has the largest number of burqa wearers in the world and that has come about because of the brainwashings and societal pressures by the accursed Tableeghi Jamaat since the mid-2000s. This would be the same in Britain where the prominent "Muslim" looks like this which does quite cut a good image of Muslims and of Islam :

This was what Pakistan's Mard-e-Momin Zia ul Haq did as part of his "Shariaization" :

So a sham really. If you want true Islamic socio-economics you should look at Communism or at least Socialism :

why you bring zia sham sharia i am talking bout the real deal.

The first port of call for CIA to see if they can destabilize a Muslim-majority country is to see it CIA can collaborate with the mullahs there. This happened whether in Egypt during Nasser's time and later or in Pakistan or in Indonesia. It is not the Aurat March who are the CIA agents it is the mullahs.



Well, the motorcycle as a vehicle should have been globally banned and when females ride it they seem to do it to feel equal to males in a perverse way so I don't like that. Secondly, gyms should be banned for females. The female body should be feminine, not hardened, thin, muscular etc.

I must inform you that India has the largest number of burqa wearers in the world and that has come about because of the brainwashings and societal pressures by the accursed Tableeghi Jamaat since the mid-2000s. This would be the same in Britain where the prominent "Muslim" looks like this which does quite cut a good image of Muslims and of Islam :

This was what Pakistan's Mard-e-Momin Zia ul Haq did as part of his "Shariaization" :

So a sham really. If you want true Islamic socio-economics you should look at Communism or at least Socialism :

only mullah cia is molvi diesel. saudi are cia front they fund wahabism and alciada.
most mullahs are not cia but idiots. but most of them, they are not the ones stealing imf money, assets abroad etc it is the seculars wankers doing chori.

The first port of call for CIA to see if they can destabilize a Muslim-majority country is to see it CIA can collaborate with the mullahs there. This happened whether in Egypt during Nasser's time and later or in Pakistan or in Indonesia. It is not the Aurat March who are the CIA agents it is the mullahs.



Well, the motorcycle as a vehicle should have been globally banned and when females ride it they seem to do it to feel equal to males in a perverse way so I don't like that. Secondly, gyms should be banned for females. The female body should be feminine, not hardened, thin, muscular etc.

I must inform you that India has the largest number of burqa wearers in the world and that has come about because of the brainwashings and societal pressures by the accursed Tableeghi Jamaat since the mid-2000s. This would be the same in Britain where the prominent "Muslim" looks like this which does quite cut a good image of Muslims and of Islam :

This was what Pakistan's Mard-e-Momin Zia ul Haq did as part of his "Shariaization" :

So a sham really. If you want true Islamic socio-economics you should look at Communism or at least Socialism :

india can be western wank job but it still be a shitole where man does tatty on the beach, on the road, on the railway. caste system, elite vs poor, businessman exploiting poor, 56 inch modi hindutvas. none of this is burqa. if she was wearing bikini then it be called progress.

 

[jamahir]

why you bring zia sham sharia i am talking bout the real deal.

What do you mean ?

most mullahs are not cia but idiots. but most of them, they are not the ones stealing imf money, assets abroad etc it is the seculars wankers doing chori.

Well, the secular wankers may do the chori but they don't corrode the society from within. The secular chors may be taken to task and Pakistanis on PDF have indeed rightly spoken against them but the mullahs impose their perversions upon the society using the excuse that they know Islam and others don't despite the fact the Islam does not allow a clergy system, no priest as agent between Human and God. It is easy to overthrow the secular wanking chors but more difficult to overthrow the mullahs, the priests, the right-wingers generally. The closet that Pakistan came to this was twice : The first in 1951 when the leftist poet Faiz Ahmed Faiz and his Communist comrades in the military and society in general almost took governance power but got thwarted and got arrested. The second was during Musharraf's time but he got regime-changed by various unpleasant elements.

only mullah cia is molvi diesel.

I see.

saudi are cia front they fund wahabism and alciada.

Of course.

 

[jamahir]

Huh some seculars pigs want Afghan women to be like their mothers exposed to the whole and showcase of product quality

I have the proper words to answer to that but will not because the mods may delete my post.