El Sidd
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2017
- Messages
- 67,597
- Reaction score
- 2
- Country
- Location
Nor does one simply expect a non-troll response from El Cid.
If a man is considered a myth by others, does he cease to be human?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nor does one simply expect a non-troll response from El Cid.
This part of statement made my day.One does not simply walk into Mordor
What happened in 1948 was last and final and now neither side is capable of taking Kashmir from each other because of nukes. Neither side has given each other Kashmir, we took it from Kashmiris.
I would expect a more rationale and mature response from you.
THe problem from Pakistan's perspective is that it had no financial reserve to fight a war. Wars are expensive ventures and we are bankrupt. Whether we lower our Nuke threshold or rely on China remains to be seen.India is not in a position to confront China. AJK is safe, not because of PA, but because of Pakistani nuclear weapon and China.
Did Chinese open the Ladakh front to drain Indian resources from LoC due to the efforts of Imran Khan, or the traitor Bajwa ??India is not in a position to confront China. AJK is safe, not because of PA, but because of Pakistani nuclear weapon and China.
No offense but a bit childish, sir. It's not their soldiers fault that bollywood makes them out to be superhumans to sell movies.
lol, you seem to be getting your supply directly from the IEA.Did Chinese open the Ladakh front to drain Indian resources from LoC due to the efforts of Imran Khan, or the traitor Bajwa ??
No offense but a bit childish, sir. It's not their soldiers fault that bollywood makes them out to be superhumans to sell movies.
That being said, it's very funny
Kashmir is a trilateral issue between India, Pakistan and China. Afghanistan, Tajikistan are also party to the conflict.
Pakistan is ready to host a trilateral summit on Kashmir inviting representatives of Tajikistan and Afghanistan as observers.
..... the same bajwa who refused to put pressure on india and was going all aman kia aasha when the LAC was hot.
Where does this terrain argument go when you all make claims about conquering ladakh, sikkim and Arunachal PradeshTerrain play a big role as well. Not easy to conquer AJK, also natives will fight against Indians as well.
It's not their soldiers fault that bollywood makes them out to be superhumans to sell movies.
You should be extremely naive to think Chinese only moved into Ladakh just to protect their 'claim line', and not the CPEC. It is logical to believe that then COAS (Bajwa) had more than something to do with this flanking manoeuvre, reducing Indian superiority in men and material to 1:1, on the LoC. Bajwa actually paved the way for some lasting peace by splitting the Indian attention in this manner to counter their belligerence. Shaheed Arshad Shareef was all praise for Bajwa along with Fawad Chaudhary , for Bajwa's advice of measured response in Feb. 2019. Imran himself angrily retorted to NA ruckus created by N-league over Aug 2019 'non-moves' by India by saying, "Tou kya main hamla kardun India pe... ?? " Now who were you calling coward again ???you seem to be getting your supply directly from the IEA.
As if the Chinese needed bajwa to whup indians, the same bajwa who refused to put pressure on india and was going all aman kia aasha when the LAC was hot.
They also didn't need IK, in case you feel the need to mention him to avoid answering.
What do the other two have to do with it?Kashmir is a trilateral issue between India, Pakistan and China. Afghanistan, Tajikistan are also party to the conflict.
Pakistan is ready to host a trilateral summit on Kashmir inviting representatives of Tajikistan and Afghanistan as observers.