What's new

Taher trial illegal : Zia Zia masterminded cold-blooded murder of Taher !

monitor

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Apr 24, 2007
Messages
8,570
Reaction score
7
Country
Bangladesh
Location
Bangladesh
Taher trial illegal
HC says Zia masterminded cold-blooded murder of Taher
Ashutosh Sarkar

* Treat Col Taher, other accused in the case as patriots, not traitors

* Consider providing compensation to victims

* Prosecute military tribunal judge Abdul Ali for Taher's execution

* Probe Zia's 'involvement' in killing Bangabandhu, freedom fighters

The trial and execution of freedom fighter Col Abu Taher in 1976 was masterminded by the then chief martial law administrator, Gen Ziaur Rahman, the High Court said yesterday declaring the military tribunal and the trial illegal and unconstitutional.

"The so-called trial and execution of Colonel Abu Taher was a cold blooded assassination which was masterminded by a person no other than Ziaur Rahman," the court said after weeks of hearing on pleas by Taher's family and others to call the entire trial illegal.

Col Taher was a sector com mander during the 1971 Liberation War of Bangladesh. His supporters say he had a role in the soldiers' uprising on Nov 7, 1975 that saw Ziaur Rahman's release from confinement in Dhaka Cantonment.

Taher was later arrested and put to trial by a military tribunal that sentenced him to death on charges of mutiny and treason. He was executed on July 21, 1976.

Sixteen others including politicians Sirajul Alam Khan, ASM Abdur Rab, Maj (retd) Zia Uddin, Hasanul Huq Inu, Sharif Nurul Ambia, and Mahmudur Rahman Manna were also tried on the same charges and sentenced to various jail terms.

Delivering a judgment on four separate writ petitions, the HC bench of Justice AHM Shamsuddin Chowdhury Manik and Justice Sheikh Md Zakir Hossain yesterday said, "Ziaur Rahman is not available now to face the murder charge as he is already dead, Abdul Ali will be prosecuted for killing Taher under the order of Ziaur Rahman." Abdul Ali is the only living judge of the military tribunal.

Senior judge of the bench Justice Shamsuddin Chowdhury Manik announced the verdict saying, "The so-called pretentious trial of Colonel Abu Taher, Hasanul Huq Inu, Mahmudur Rahman Manna, Major (retired) Zia Uddin and others was a hoax, a sham, and a fiction."

"The sentence passed by the fake tribunal is hereby set aside and quashed, as if it is set that such fictitious and farcical trial never took place."

The court ruled that Col Taher will be treated as a martyr and a patriot instead of a traitor, and the others tried and convicted on false sedition charges will be treated as patriots as well. The court directed the authorities to amend relevant records to that effect.

Family members of Taher and Hasanul Huq Inu were present in the courtroom during the delivery of the verdict. US journalist and writer Lawrence Lifschultz, who had covered the trial of Taher in 1976, was also present.

They termed the judgment historic, and expressed satisfaction.

Justice Manik said the military tribunal and the so-called trial was not in accordance with any recognised law of the country.

The camera trial, which was held inside a prison, was in total violation of all norms of justice, he went on.

The court said there was no process of charge framing against the so-called accused, no first information report or charge sheet, and the accused were not told about the charges they were about to face.

The accused were neither allowed to have access to lawyers, nor to cross examine the prosecution witness, they were barred from appealing against the verdict and from seeking a review, the bench said. They were not even allowed to submit mercy petitions, it noted.

The so-called tribunal had no document before it for holding the trial, and it did not allow the accused to defend themselves either, the HC observed.

"In short it was not even a show-trial as Lawrence Lifschultz stated before us. The purported trial was arranged only to justify Zia's decision to kill Taher with a view to establishing autocracy," Justice Manik said.

The HC asked the government to seriously consider the question of compensating the victims of the military tribunal including the family members of Taher for the wrongs done to them by Ziaur Rahman.

The court said apart from Lawrence Lifschultz, Hasanul Huq Inu, and Mahmudur Rahman Manna, Zia's close associates Gen (retd) Nurul Islam Shishu and Moudud Ahmed also confirmed that Zia alone had decided to kill Taher even before formation of the so-called tribunal.

The bench castigated those who had said that Lawrence Lifschultz had come to Bangladesh as a government-hired agent.

Although the remark is tantamount to contempt of court, the bench is not bringing any charge, said the court adding that the persons who made the comment must refrain from making such remarks on sub-judice matters.

The bench also directed the government to constitute a high profile committee to investigate the allegation that Ziaur Rahman was "directly involved in the killing of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman" on August 15, 1975, and after 1975 in the killing of several thousand military personnel who had been freedom fighters.

The committee will be comprised of retired judges of the Supreme Court, lawyers, journalists, human rights activists, civil society members, retired senior military and police officials, and civil servants, the bench said.

Justice Manik gave a list of actions by Ziaur Rahman that "prove his anti-liberation stand".

The justice said Zia erased the slogan Joy Bangla; changed the basic principles of the liberation war including secularism; appointed Shah Azizur Rahman, one of the worst collaborators of the Pakistani occupying army, as the prime minister; and appointed other collaborators Mustafizur Rahman and Abdul Alim as ministers after usurping the state power.

Ziaur Rahman introduced the politics of religious fundamentalism in the country, accommodated all war criminals and collaborators of the occupying army, "immunised" the killers of Bangabandhu Shekih Mujibur Rahman, and gave them respectable jobs, Justice Manik said.

He also said Ziaur Rahman converted Suhrawardi Uddyan -- the relic of Bangabandhu's historical March 7 speech, and the place where Pakistani armed forces surrendered -- into Shishu Park only to wipe out the memory of the liberation war.

Ziaur Rahman also made the government-controlled media stop terming the then Pakistani forces as occupation forces, he added.

Taher's widow Lutfa Taher; his brother M Anwar Hossain; and Fatema Yusuf, wife of Yusuf Ali Khan, who was given life sentence by the military court; jointly filed a writ petition on August 22 last year challenging the legality of the military tribunal and the trial.

On August 23 last year, the HC issued a rule asking the government to explain why the martial law regulation under which Taher was tried and executed should not be declared illegal and unconstitutional.

Jatiya Samajtantrik Dal President Hasanul Huq Inu and its Vice-president Rabiul Alam, Maj (retd) Zia Uddin, and Abdul Majid, who were also tried and punished by the same military tribunal, filed three other writ petitions with the HC on similar grounds in January this year.

The HC on different days in January issued separate rules on the government.

During hearings on the rules, a number of senior lawyers placed submissions before the court as amici curiae (friends of the court), saying that the trial of Taher and others was illegal and unconstitutional.

Lawrence Lifschultz also placed separate statements before the HC bench.

Dr Kamal Hossain, Barrister M Amir-Ul Islam, Dr M Zahir, Barrister MI Farooqui, Advocate Yusuf Hossain Humayun, Dr Akther Imam, among others, placed submissions on the matter as well.

Barrister Rokanuddin Mahmud and Dr Shahdeen Malik argued for the petitioners, while Attorney General Mahbubey Alam, Additional Attorney General MK Rahman, and Deputy Attorney General ABM Altaf Hossain appeared for the government.
 
hmmm..inetresting...
 
Taher trial illegalHC says Zia masterminded cold-blooded murder of


Here are some facts to understand motive behind such farcical judgment:

1) Justice AHM Shamsuddin Chowdhury Manik and Justice Sheikh Md Zakir Hossain are known Chttra league cadre. These judges are Awami contribution to make Bangladesh justice system most corrupt; morally and otherwise.

2) Col Taher was sacked from Bangladesh army by Mujib Government.

3) Col Taher by his own admission revolted against govt and wanted to disband army and create jasod gonobahini. According to rule of Bangladesh military law punishment for his revolt is death.


This case was staged by Awami kangaroo judges to undermine Zia and his role in Bangladesh. But that too will go in vain.
 
this verdict is very painful for us as it put judiciary under suspicion of align itself with partisan and nepotism .very grim situation for country . how much al govt wants to make judiciary under questionable position is the main concern for us .
 
This time when BNP comes in power, I really hope they'l bring the shiraj shikdar case for Mujib!
 
of course siraj sikdar was killed and was over joyed openly by mujib where zia didn't said any thing about taher . to my knowledge Taher was trial under military court martial so at least it had some justice where siraj sikdar was killed under police custody .
 
Here are some facts to understand motive behind such farcical judgment:

1) Justice AHM Shamsuddin Chowdhury Manik and Justice Sheikh Md Zakir Hossain are known Chttra league cadre. These judges are Awami contribution to make Bangladesh justice system most corrupt; morally and otherwise.

2) Col Taher was sacked from Bangladesh army by Mujib Government.

3) Col Taher by his own admission revolted against govt and wanted to disband army and create jasod gonobahini. According to rule of Bangladesh military law punishment for his revolt is death.


This case was staged by Awami kangaroo judges to undermine Zia and his role in Bangladesh. But that too will go in vain.

যে সামরিক আদালতে কর্নেল (অব:) আবু তাহের বীরোত্তমের বিচার হয়, তার গঠন, কার্যক্রম, বিধিমালা কোনো কিছুই আইন ও সংবিধান সম্মত ছিল না। মুক্তিযুদ্ধের পরও যে সামরিক কর্মকর্তা চার বছর পাকিস্তান সেনাবাহিনীতে কর্মরত ছিলেন তাকে করা হয়েছিল ট্রাইবু্যনালের চেয়ারম্যান। এমনকি ওই বিচারক কর্নেল ইউছুফ হায়দার মুক্তিযুদ্ধ চলাকালে বাংলাদেশে অবস্থান করেও মুক্তিযুদ্ধে যোগ দেননি। চার সদস্যের ট্রাইবু্যনালের অপর সদস্য হলেন উইং কমান্ডার মোহাম্মদ আবদুর রশিদ, কমান্ডার সিদ্দিক আহমদ, ম্যাজিস্ট্রেট হাসান মোর্শেদ ও ম্যাজিস্ট্রেট মোহাম্মদ আবদুল আলী। ভাগ্যের নিমর্ম পরিহাস শেষোক্তজন ছাড়া আর কেউ জীবিত নেই।

কর্নেল তাহেরকে যে অভিযোগে অভিযুক্ত করা হয় তার জন্য মৃতু্যদণ্ড দেয়ার কোনো বিধান ছিল না। ফাঁসি কার্যকরের দশদিন পর আইন মন্ত্রণালয় এ সংক্রান্ত সামরিক আইনের সংশোধনী এনে "বাংলাদেশের প্রতিরক্ষা বাহিনীতে কোনো ধরনের রাজনৈতিক মতাদর্শ প্রচারের অপরাধের শাস্তি মৃতু্যদণ্ডের বিধান করে।" সম্পূর্ণ মামলাটিই চলছিল জবরদস্তিমূলকভাবে। এই মামলার কোনো আদেশ কিংবা তার রায়ের বিরুদ্ধে উচ্চতর কোনো কতর্ৃপক্ষ বা আদালতে আপিল করার কোনো সুযোগ ছিল না ।

১৯৭৬ সালের ২১ জুলাই মুক্তিযুদ্ধের অন্যতম সেক্টর কমাণ্ডার কর্নেল (অব.) আবু তাহের বীরোত্তমকে সামরিক আদালতে গোপন বিচারের রায়ে ফাঁসি দেয়া হয়। সামরিক আইনের বাধার কারণে ওই সময় দেশের কোনো সংবাদপত্রেই ট্রাইবু্যনালের কোনো সংবাদ প্রকাশ করেনি। একমাত্র দৈনিক ইত্তেফাক "ষড়যন্ত্র মামলা শুরু"! এই শিরোনামে একটি সংবাদ প্রকাশ করে। এজন্য ইত্তেফাকের সম্পাদক আনোয়ার হোসেন মঞ্জুকে সেনা সদরে ডেকে নেয়া হয়েছিল । এজন্য তাকে অনেক হুমকির সম্মুখীন হতে হয়। কর্নেল তাহেরের গোপন বিচারের সেই অজানা তথ্য নিয়ে এ প্রতিবেদনটি রচনা করা হয়েছে।
 
Zia-ur-Rehman was a hero and still the most popular leader among the masses. A cummy like Taher can never be a hero no mater how much Awami court and co try.

La-Hasia is actually a very low quality person and ungreatful. It was president Zia who rehavilate her in politics yet she is taking all the steps to distored the image of this great man.

La-Hasina and co may be able to fabiricate these negetive verdicts against him for little while but she can not delete his legecy from people heart. People will repay her very soon Insh'Allah!
 
@ It was true that Col Taher and his revolutionary Army released General Zia from the house arrest of General Monjur. After the "Sepoy Revolution", Col Taher gave lot of demand to General Zia for its quick implementation. Many of his demands were materialised. One of the main demend was dis-continue of Batman system. All the "Jasad" political leaders were released from the jail. But he was not satisfied he demended the complete break down of the present army system and wanted to make "People's Revolutionary Army" means so called "Classless Army", which Zia did not agreed.

@ Soon Col Taher started killing the army officers and their families and it was said that near about 30 army officers and their families in total 60 persons were killed. Col Taher's brothers and other members of his group even tried to kidnap Mr Shoren Singh, the Indian High Commissioner but failed with some casualties.

@ It was alleged that finally they conspired with Indian RAW to make another military coup at some where near Elephant Road where Indian High Commissioner himself was present. Soon after this Col Taher's was arrested. The then govt immediately banned three political party, these were "JSD, Communist Party (Moni Singh) and another political party which I did not remember.

@ Now at that time ML was in force so he was trialed under ML. The offence he commited was anti-state so he was supposed to be fired in a firing squad. So, what he was a "Mukti Joddha". Many FM and Generals were fired by Hitler during the Second World War.

@ The problem is since the present govt has made the 5th Amendment as illegal so the trial of Col Taher was also illegal. I donnot under stand why the govt is allowing all these rabbish things. Now, I am thinking to sue against the British Govt. I remember, one of my Great grandfather was a school teacher and he went to attend at "Jalianwala Bagh", but he was brutally killed by the order of the British General. Al-Zakir can you help me in this regard with legal aspects ?
 
@ md akmal
Zia had communicate with Taher for his released ? or Taher himself did it as he knew Zia is the most popular officer in army who can fulfill his dream ?
Taher wanted to bring Zia to Radio Station /some where eles i forgot but zia didn't came so Taher had told his associates revolution failed .
 
About the Verdict of Col Taher's Trial

@ Every event has differing viewpoints and a story from both sides. If one considers the viewpoints of both the sides, many apparent injustices end up looking not so blatant wrongful act. However, even after considering both viewpoints, certain acts remain gross injustice and in a lifetime, one would experience many injustices and see many injustices being committed. In the history of Bangladesh of all the most wrongful acts committed and injustices imposed on the state of Bangladesh, the excesses of high court Justices Shamsuddin Chowdhury Manik and Zakir Hossain will remain one of the most outrageous ones. People talk about the barbaric acts of the goons of ruling party student/ youth forums -- Chhatra league/ Jubo League. But the acts committed by these two ex chhatra league goons are thousand time worst crimes than those committed all chhatra league cadres combined.

@ Recently these two judges resorted to a popularity contest partisan and populist verdicts. Their judgements/ verdicts, however, are even worse than the columns of the most partisan unaccountable pro ruling party columnist or the most aggressive party leaflet. While giving the verdict on the legality of the punishment of Col Taher, these high-court declared that the whole trail process was illegal and it was in fact a cold blooded murder of Taher by Late president Ziaur Rahman.

@ How high-court did to come to this conclusion? They interviewed one shoddy journalist character Lawrence lifshultz, who is a political follower of Taher's communist doctrine. Other interviewed are also 1. Political opponents of Ziaur Rahman's political platform 2. Supporters of ruling party who took it as their prime job to destroy Zia's image 3. Political followers of Colonel Taher. Even the judges who delivered the justice, are publicly known nemesis of Ziaur Rahman's ideology. Before we go further into what these two judges did and what their judgement means, lets see what Taher in fact did back in early 70s.

1. Taher revolted against the then Awami League government of Sheikh Mijibur Rahman and formed and led an armed force called " Gonobahinee". Thousands and thousands of Awami League activists, leaders as well as general people were killed by the armed force. Any literature describing Mujib era Bangladesh will give testimony of the atrocities of Taher's Gonobahinee.

2. While all other sector commanders were being promoted in the army as Brigadier/ Major General and who in turn helped rebuild the army, Taher was sacked from Bangladesh army by Mujib Government. ( It is unclear what Shamsuddin Chowdhury Manik had to say about this cold blooded sacking of 'war hero' Taher).

3. Many sources, well informed of the political military dynamics of 1975, say that it was Taher who was more likely to kill Mujib and there was an invisible race among Taher's group and Faruq Rashids group in who would kill Mujib first. After hearing of the massacre of 15th August, most observers' first suspicion was on Taher.

4. Taking the advantage of unstable situation of Bangladesh, Taher's forces ( a select group of armed anti state forces including Taher's brother Bahar) attacked Indian High Commission in Dhaka in an attempt to kidnap and kill India's high commissioner in Dhaka, Mr Samar Sen. A commando force guarding India's high Commission thwarted the attack. After prolonged gunfight between these two group, many commando guards as well four members of Taher forces ( Including Taher brother Bahar) was killed.

5. In the above statement Taher comes down hard upon Brig Khaled Mosharraf. he also probably acknowledge being involved in his killing when he says that 'when these cowards was begging for their lives on bent knees?' Who were begging for their lives to him?

6. The same judiciary which is all gung ho in coming down upon Ziaur Rahman for grabbing power by martial law, the same court which keeps on declaring power takeover by coups illegal every other day and takes yet another bite at Ziaur Rahman, suddenly has a change of heart in exonerating Taher's military takeover that ultimately put Ziaur Rahman in power.

7. Taher clearly states that he requested martial law and he wanted Zia to be CMLA of the martial law and Zia declines to be CMLA.
In the above statement made to the court, he explains that he wanted to dismantle the tradition armed forces of Bangladesh and created a revolutionary forces. How many of our new generation Taher followers what Taher's plans meant? Do Justices Manik and Zakir know of Khmer Rouge of Cambodia? Do they the history what Pol pot did to the country in the name of peoples' army run revolution of production? Or in more recent history, would Nepalese military dismantle to pave the way for the Maoists to take over as peoples' army?

8. The violent coup/ communist indoctrinated uprising that Taher staged, caused the lives of at least sixty members of armed forces ( Officers and teir family). Among those killed included war hero, war time K force leader Khaled Mosharraf, war hero Col ATM Haider, war hero Col Saiful Huda. All of them were killed at the then military garrison at Sher e Bangla Nagar. Sher e Bangla Nagar happened to be the HQ of the rebel forces led by Taher. None of these war heroes were killed in a matter of minutes. They were all arrested, kept in the garrison at nearly a day before being killed. It is impossible to believe that Taher was not aware of these high profile killings by his forces. But for the sake of debate, if one agrees that Taher was not aware of those killings, can Taher absolve himself of the responsibility of the murder of Khaled Mosharraf and 60 other? On many occasions, he claimed that he staged the mutiny. How can the leader of a mutiny can be exempted of the atrocities caused by a mutiny? Judge Manik et el are so passionate about correcting history, what about trial of the killers of Khaled Mosharraf and sixty others?

9. Pilkhana is fresh in our memory. The atrocities committed by BDR sepoys are despicable. A massacre was committed, rapes, loots, arson were indiscriminate. Bodies were burnt and buried in mass graves. Is there any scope of letting the leader of these crimes go unpunished citing technicality of law or lack of law? When murders/ killings are committed, the state has every right to hand maximal punishment to the killers. If Taher can be exonerated for staging a Pilkhana style violent fatal uprising, then on what logic the state can punish Pilkhana uprising leaders? In other words, if Pilkhana mutiny leader DAD Touhid is punished for his crimes, why can not Taher not be punished?

10. There is a propaganda that Taher's was a secret trial. In fact it was exactly the opposite.Even Col Taher spoke for hours after hours. He was seen frequently misbehaving with the judge of the court.

11. Using high judiciary for partisan point scoring and distorting history is one of the gravest crimes against the state one can think of. Judge Manik and Zakir are shutting everyone's mouth by scaring of them of contempt of court. It is not too far way when these two judges and their boss will understand what people' power is.
 
Just to inform everyone here,

Col. Taher was a die-hard leftist. He was a Commie. He wanted to create a peoples army, similar to the PLA of China. That is, an army within an army. He opposed the traditional and organizational model of an actual army. He instead favored a people's army. But many of his comrades (including Zia) and Mujib ignored him.

If memory serves me correctly, the law and order situation in Bangladesh was terrible after the 1971 war. A well organized military was needed at the time. Simply creating a people's army wouldn't solve the problems. Pillaging, looting and raping was common.

Col. Taher's intention was to create an army within an army. If anyone were to do that in any military of the world, he/she would be executed immediately for treason.

Many Bangladeshi soldiers died during those events. I mean, MANY.

If anyone were to know the truth, Col. Taher was a fool. He died from his own foolishness.

But if we look at our army today, they enjoy many benefits, too many benefits. Large patches of land individually for the army, air-force, navy and the BGB. Why all this? Because our whimsical leaders are afraid that the military would overthrow in a coup. Why? Because there is no constitution in Bangladesh that says that the military must protect the country's democratic system.
 
Col Taher's brothers and other members of his group even tried to kidnap Mr Shoren Singh, the Indian High Commissioner but failed with some casualties.
@ It was alleged that finally they conspired with Indian RAW to make another military coup at some where near Elephant Road where Indian High Commissioner himself was present.

irony is flowing unchecked :coffee:
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom