Ultima Thule
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2012
- Messages
- 16,725
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
And each side also has ECCM to get rid those ECMyou have a point
you stupid each side also has counter measures against bvrm's
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And each side also has ECCM to get rid those ECMyou have a point
you stupid each side also has counter measures against bvrm's
BY THE TIME THEY DO THAT THE PILOTS WILL BE WAVING TO EACH OTHERAnd each side also has ECCM to get rid those ECM
It's a totally automatic system no need for pilot inputBY THE TIME THEY DO THAT THE PILOTS WILL BE WAVING TO EACH OTHER
OK LETS SUPPOSE EACH AIRCRAFT FIRE THERE BVRM AND BOTH MISSILE MISS THERE TARGET BY THEN BOTH AIRCAFTS WILL BE WITHIN VISUAL RANGE
yes you are right but what about MIG-29 and MIRAGE 2000, they have less RCS as to compare SU-30MKIare you dumb or something all of the aircraft in the iaf have high RCS they will pop up on our radars as soon as they take off. the su30 has a huge disadvantage due to its size, the size makes it easier to be spot on radars. a block 52 16 may shoot down a su30 before the su30 knows what hit it
whats the backbone of the iaf mig-29, mirage 2000 or su-30mkiyes you are right but what about MIG-29 and MIRAGE 2000, they have less RCS as to compare SU-30MKI
Cannot understand people's obsession with BVR.
If the stated range is 120km that is for a stationary target when the missile is traveling in a straight line. In real world the actual range and kill probability of BVR is far less than what the manufacturer states.
In Indian MKI fires BVR at JF-17,obviously JF-17 will maneuver,and the missile will have to change direction to compensate,that will bleed energy reducing range and kill probability. In my opinion BVR is least useful after half of stated range.
so you mean if war begin between IN and PK InAF will use SU-30 MKI to attack PK and other asset don't used, what child's thinkingwhats the backbone of the iaf mig-29, mirage 2000 or su-30mki
im not saying that... the f16 is equal to the mirage and migso you mean if war begin between IN and PK InAF will use SU-30 MKI to attack PK and other asset don't used, what child's thinking
the missile called "T-Darter" does not exist, nor its in development.
There is a SAM called Marlin is being developed by Denel. Testing would start from this year.
Denel also proposed a BVR AAM of Marlin, which is this.
At the moment South Africa is seeking a partner to reduce risk on the project and elevate it to a full-scale joint development programme. “With that, comes skills growth and industry job opportunity for both parties,” Denel said. “The outcome of collaboration on Marlin will be a Beyond Visual Range (BVR) missile for the two Air Forces and an All-Weather Surface-to-Air Missile (SAM) for the two Navies and Armies.”
Currently that partner is probably Brazil. Pakistan could get a piece of action if its willing to invest in the money.
Did Denel give any proposed specs, parameters etc? Like what they have in mind? Which class it will belong to? From the image appears an Active BVR in the class of AIM-120 and R-77. But that would be just my imagination.
Personally I think Pakistan should jump in. This could arm our JF-17s in future. We might get some share if it can find some exports. The technical knowhow of developing a BVR will be invaluable itself.
so what the counter for IAF SU-30MKI?im not saying that... the f16 is equal to the mirage and mig