Perhaps some totally dumb people still believe
that they are totally dumb as bombs
How stupid is it to come up with such lame excuse? You didn't accept the support of Assad in 2012 and you you still don't do it in 2015. Perhaps god sent Jibrael with revelation upon Jihadists that people supporting Assad in 2012 have stopped doing it in 2015.
But the reality is this that FSA disappeared in 2015 with no support from Syrian people, and thus US is not even able to recruit for FSA. This is a real embarrassment.
What? Have you really read the article or what?
The article gave the full reference to the Polls that were conducted by Arab Gulf State organization, and surely they were not pro Assad.
Do yourself a favor and read the realities before opening up your mouth. It could save you from a lot of embarrassment.
Ah so you're suggesting peoples' opinions can't change over time?
I repeat: Articles from 2012 ARE NOT evidence of Syrians' views in 2015. Any sane human being knows that.
Now, for a survey of refugees (you know, the people running away from the conflict) and who they're running away from):
Care about refugees? Listen to them.
70% are fleeing Assad, 32% ISIS, 18% FSA, 17% Nusra, and 8% Kurds. (Multiple choices allowed.)
And much more on that matter. This, is actually a relevant piece of info, which is recent. Unlike your retarded 2012 crap.
Here's also something relevant, Syrians protesting in Vienna (in front of the "peace talks" meeting):
Once again explain to the readers how this tank column has anything to do with Russia bombing that bridge. In a rational strategic way explain what makes the Russians ignoramuses.
Why are you tap dancing around the subject? You can not even remember what you said in previous posts. Someone posted a video of a Russian air strike on a bridge. You called the Russians ignoramuses then went on to make some sarcastic statements about how Isis would not use armor or tanks to cross the bridge.
I then asked why the Russians are ignoramuses for destroying a bridge that cuts off Isis forces and prevents resuply. You then mention some far away random tank column, I asked you to prove to me that the bridge was destroyed because of this tank column and you failed to do so; moreover, you failed to explain why the Russians are so stupid for destroying a vital bridge that links Isis forces.
So far you have been caught with your pants down
Nice propaganda
Russia has officially asked the US, NATO block countries and gulf states to confirm those reports and thus far no one has come forwards.
Most western sources are quoting the Syrian observatory for Human rights which is run by one man from his home in the UK, the man has not been in Syria for 15 years.
I recall western and Arab sources accusing Russia of hitting civilian targets by circulating an image that was taken 5 days before Russia started bombing.
there are many countries including Arab and NATO block countries as well as the Syrian Air Force that are bombing ground targets; moreover, "rebel" and government forces are both using mortars, MLRSs, and even artillery yet when a civilian target is hit the blame is placed on Russia dispite no proof or proper investigation. Then again like many other lies that are coming out of western and Arab media sources it would not surprise me if there was no hospitals that were even hit.
Russians are ignoramuses because
you're the one who doesn't know context.
500 linked a video of Jaish al Islam training in
open desert and noted how Russia, with it's stronk surveillance taktiks, was not able to catch a JAI tank column in the open desert.
Then, some Russian troll posted a video of "accurate Russian airstrikes" in RESPONSE to 500's post about the JAI tank column. The whole video of Russians bombing a bridge was in response to the JAI tank column. And here you are, saying I'm the ignorant one. Idiot.
Since when did Russia need confirmation about something the SAA captured a year ago? NATO or Gulf states don't talk about what rebels capture. Therefore, your argument is stupid. Yet again. How surprising!
Morek has been held since 2014 by the SAA, unless rebels held that town for 1 year, raised the SAA flag, allowed SAA to operate within it, and only to withdraw now 1 year later so SAA can claim full recapture.
I don't care what westerners quote, I never quote SOHR myself, I quote SNHR, an entire network of activists on the ground who provide evidence of their claims. Unlike you Russian trolls.
I can post dozens of videos and pictures of results of Russian bombing, but I cannot due to the threads' restrictions. Otherwise, I can make you look like the complete fool that you are, not that I already haven't proven that point time and time again.
Statement from today's meeting in Vienna. I think it's a well balanced and reasonable one, but Nusra, ISIS and their supporters are not going to like it. Also, Secular state of Syria will remain intact in any future government. It doesn't mention Assad and it requires defeat of ISIS and Nusra (without mentioning its name, but implying it) in order for any political solution to be implemented.
How surprising. ISIS and Nusra, who killed 2,000 civilians max, absolutely must be destroyed.
Assad, who killed 179,000, yeah he can live.
"Secular character"
Me and most other Syrians know who wrote this, and it's definitely someone who is interested in keeping their influence in Syria, and that would be Russia. Not interested in saving Syrian lives or carrying out justice.
BTW rebels Nusra and even ISIS are mostly Syrians unlike foreign mercenary scum called Hezbollah.
