IR1907
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2014
- Messages
- 560
- Reaction score
- -6
- Country
- Location
Rebels claim full control in Ariha just in 3 hours.
Assad army:
''PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST'' my ***. More like Hasbara/alqaeda terrorist fanboy.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Rebels claim full control in Ariha just in 3 hours.
Assad army:
this is surprising to see from an Israeli perspective.Rebels claim full control in Ariha just in 3 hours.
Assad army:
Analysis: Shiite Pakistani casualties of the wars in Syria and Iraq
BY ALI ALFONEH | March 17, 2015 | alfoneh@defenddemocracy.org | @Alfoneh
A comparative analysis of funeral services held in Iran for seven Shiite Pakistani nationals killed in combat in Syria and Iraq (Table 1, below), and those of Shiite Afghan casualties in Syria, provides insight into Tehran’s use of non-Iranian Shiites in its struggle against regional Sunni adversaries such as Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and their salafist jihadist affiliates.
As with the Afghan casualties, the funeral processions of all Shiite Pakistani “martyrs” killed in Syria and Iraq took place in Iran, in the presence of their family and relatives, which indicates that they were residing there prior to their deployment, and did not volunteer for combat from Pakistan. In the case ofJavid Hossein, Iranian media outlets admit that he was a resident of Qom.
Just as with the Afghan casualties, the Islamic Republic’s media insist the Shiite Pakistani “martyrs” had joined the struggle independent of government agencies in Iran, but representatives of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC), the Basij militia and government clerics were present at the funeral services. This clearly indicates an active engagement of Iranian government agencies in the recruitment and deployment of Shiite Pakistanis to Syria and Iraq.
Apart from the aforementioned similarities, there are a number of differences between Shiite Afghan and Shiite Pakistani casualties from Syria and Iraq.
The most obvious difference is the number of the casualties from each group. Since the release of the data on Shiite Afghan casualties in Syria on March 12, four more Shiite Afghans killed in combat have been identified, bringing the number to sixty-six casualties. By comparison, only seven Shiite Pakistani casualties have been detected in the Iranian press. This may reflect the significantly smaller population of Pakistani immigrants residing in Iran, which provides Iranian government agencies with a smaller pool of recruits.
In contrast to Shiite Afghan casualties who all serve in the purely Afghan Fatemiyoun Brigade, the Pakistani recruits do not seem to have a brigade of their own. The Pakistanis also suffered casualties in both Iraq and Syria – whereas the Shiite Afghans were all killed in Syria – which indicates that they either served in the Qods Force of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC QF), or alongside Shiite militias allied under IRGC QF’s command. This too may be a result of the smaller pool of Shiite Pakistani recruits in Iran.
The small number of Shiite Pakistani recruits likely reflects the Islamic Republic’s limited abilities to mobilize the Shiite Pakistanis, rather than Tehran’s restrain in the struggle against nuclear-armed Pakistan. This, however, may change; as salafist jihadist terrorism against the Shiites in Pakistan chases this minority toward the regime in Tehran, Iran’s propaganda and indoctrination machinery may find more recruits among this disaffected population.
Ali Alfoneh is a senior fellow at Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD)
this is surprising to see from an Israeli perspective.
do the people of Israel truly wish for a wahhabi takeover of next door secular Syria ?
the 'original' FSA is long gone, psychopathic jihadis are all that's left of any worthy opposition, Assad is a much better option compared to them.Of course not. 500 is just posting the information he gets, although I agree it sometimes sounds like he supports rebels but I'm sure he doesn't.
Israelis want to see a secular democracy in Syria - but obviously the chances of that are so remote, that it's not even worth wasting time thinking about it.
Personally, I want to see the original FSA (what's left of them) takeover Syria in the end.
Why Nusrah attacking on Kurds ?
There will be no place for Shiite in Syria.What do YOU consider winning ? Good luck with your deserts, Shias will have access to the coast (waters) but you have to catch lizards in your dried out lands.
Do you want that ''victory'' ? LOL
Why do you want a Salafist/Muslim Brotherhood state right on your border? I would prefer Assad if I were Jordanian.There will be no place for Shiite in Syria.
Why do you want a Salafist/Muslim Brotherhood state right on your border? I would prefer Assad if I were Jordanian.
Are you too scared of the Americans and Saudis to say no?
Well now u went from students to defenders of graves to not even present
Please stick to a lie not many lies its making u look retarded.
Not just the Iranians
Anyone coming of the mullah assembly like. Normally carries that programing defect
Why do you want a Salafist/Muslim Brotherhood state right on your border? I would prefer Assad if I were Jordanian.
Are you too scared of the Americans and Saudis to say no?