Superboy
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2013
- Messages
- 6,298
- Reaction score
- -7
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Zahran did the right thing in my opinion. He is still an advocate for Sharia, but as I said before Islamic Front are fine with democracy as long as it doesn't interfere with Islam. Giving the Syrian people the choice between Sharia and Secularism is the best thing to do, and will stop basically any chance of fighting after Assad regime falls (except for fighting against ISIS.) And yes, such a speech really would rustle ISIS's jimmies, because now they can call us murtad and rawafid more and more but they have no basis.
That's Libya's problem, their war lasted only a few weeks. They didn't have the chance to clear out all of the bad in Libya, which caused more infighting. In Syria, all of the bad and good are clearly apparent. They would love to see Sharia implemented, as would I, but they want to represent the Syrian people, not repress them. Syrians should and will have a choice if they want secularism or democracy. Gov't they are fighting isn't secular, it's sectarian and oppressive. And many people do things for the good of others in the middle east, for the sake of this little thing called Islam.You mean like the blooming democracy the Libyan are enjoying? And their war only lasted a few weeks. Pretty naive to think these Islamist rebels who, as you admit yourself love sharia, would quickly embrace democracy after fighting bitterly for 4 years. On top of that the government they are fighting is secular. That's college like idealistic thinking. Tthat people do things for the good of others when this is rarely the case. So jan and company, after sacrificing so much to take over a third of the country, would say 'here Syrians you can vote your own leaders now. We just wanted Assad gone now we will simply integrate under democracy.' Thats quite a leap of faith.
Would be nice if you shoved your conspiracy theories up your *** and stuck to having putin's cock in your mouth than coming back to this thread. ThanksSyrian civil war was orchastrated from Illuminati like the arab srping and following arab winter.
Illuminati fooled arabs into the believe they could have the chance to change their own fates.
Illuminati likes to give the people fake hope to later kill them better.
That's Libya's problem, their war lasted only a few weeks. They didn't have the chance to clear out all of the bad in Libya, which caused more infighting. In Syria, all of the bad and good are clearly apparent. They would love to see Sharia implemented, as would I, but they want to represent the Syrian people, not repress them. Syrians should and will have a choice if they want secularism or democracy. Gov't they are fighting isn't secular, it's sectarian and oppressive. And many people do things for the good of others in the middle east, for the sake of this little thing called Islam.
Secret report also revealed water is wet and sky is blue?
Never said anything about US and NATO. In fact, they will have little influence in Syria, due to their inaction. Especially when US co-operates with Assad and Hezbollah. There is no secular faction in Syria besides the communist Kurds and some FSA. Alawites are not secular because they're sectarian. Most of the army are NOT Sunni. Especially when 80,000 Alawites have died. Doesn't matter if they don't accept defeat, they'll have to accept death and a one way ticket to hellLOL....right and the US and NATO will be right there holding your hands through the transition. The army is already secular so if I was a secular in Syria i'd know what side i'm on and if I was an Islamist know what side I'm on. Sectarianism is not so clear cut since most of the army is Sunni. If Assad is gone tomorrow you will still have secular baathists and they may not be ready to accept defeat. Assuming the rebels consequently solve that problem they will have internal fights between moderates and hardliners as we can already see even before they defeat Assad. Only three possibilities that I see.
1. For one of the three combatants (seculars, moderates and hardliners) to achieve complete victory and imposing their will on the en tire country.
2. For the country to be split up.
3. For the war to continue until #1.
AQ and IS didn't spend 3 years entrenching themselves only to give up and embrace democracy.
Never said anything about US and NATO. In fact, they will have little influence in Syria, due to their inaction. Especially when US co-operates with Assad and Hezbollah. There is no secular faction in Syria besides the communist Kurds and some FSA. Alawites are not secular because they're sectarian. Most of the army are NOT Sunni. Especially when 80,000 Alawites have died. Doesn't matter if they don't accept defeat, they'll have to accept death and a one way ticket to hell
JaN is mostly made up of Syrians. Most of them want to see the conflict end. Maybe JaN leadership will want to be rulers, but that won't happen on the watch of their majority Syrian group and other rebel groups. ISIS will crumble by themselves when they will no longer have any legitimacy. Most of their local support comes from their "fight" against Assad.