Dr.Thrax
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2014
- Messages
- 1,415
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
Let's see...Daily Mail: Islamophobic "source."you can post propaganda all days... just tell me what does the Syrian government benefit from a chemical attack during the UN inspectors visit? don't you see, that this chemical attack benefits the terrorists by asking the west to invade Syria?
now here I'm providing you with your own beloved western supporter sources... so you wont complain ....
UN accuses Syrian rebels of carrying out sarin gas attacks which had been blamed on Assad's troops | Daily Mail Online
Syria: Chemical Attack in Ghouta 'an Accident Caused by Free Syrian Army'
MIT: Syrian Government is not responsible for Ghouta Chemical Attack
Evidence: Syria gas attack work of U.S. allies
Hersh:Turkey’s Erdogan behind chemical attack of Syria’s Gouta
also the videos showing F$A terrorists testing chemical weapons and making threats... wont post them here because they are graphic...
The ibtimes article: They used one guy as a "source," and it was all his speculation.
For the MIT article: They assumed the rockets had 2 km range, which is BS, because the BM-14 140mm rockets and the 330mm rockets have MUCH more range than that. Otherwise why fire rockets from 2km away at a target? Militarily useless.
LOL. The wnd article: "suspicious blue canister" is a gas cylinder. Commonly used in hell cannons. Again, and idiot who doesn't know what he is talking about.
Hersh has been denounced by literally everyone for being an idiot, his only good cases were those about Vietnam.