What's new

Syrian Civil War (Graphic Photos/Vid Not Allowed)

Egypt is hardly a good example,altho mubarak stood down and morsi was elected it didnt take very long for the deep state to reassert itself and depose morsi and put mubarak mk2 ie al-sisi in his place,so really in practical terms nothing much has changed.
One could also say that if the west had not supported the rebels in libya then today libya would not be virtually a failed state :no:
As for the head chopping,that is basically an act of public murder carried out by a terrorist group,it is in no way a lawful execution carried out by a sovereign state using due legal process,:nono:but hey nice try at the moral equivalency argument mr zonist better luck next time:yay:
Egypt is TRILLION times better than Syria. If Putin was ally of Egypt he would now bomb to oblivion Alexandria and Cairo suburbs against "extremists" who want to take down "legal" Mubarak.

Are you serious? Stop before you further make an even bigger fool out of yourself.
I am serious. Money dont grow on trees, u know.

_54236326_us_debt_464_corr.gif
 
.
I am serious. Money dont grow on trees, u know.

_54236326_us_debt_464_corr.gif


I don't care how serious you are. You don't know what you are talking about. Again the US economy was growing and deficit shrinking despite 2 wars.

The massive debt surge happened in 2009 when the economic world crisis began. In the US this was in large part because banks approved Millions of people for home loans that they could not afford to pay, at the same time housing prices surged far beyond what wages did. Millions of people defaulted on loans (hundreds of thousands to millions per home). The US bailed out those banks with 700 billion dollars, while many who went into default filled for bankruptcy in which the government payed off their debt. Millions of people also lost their jobs and were getting government checks each week not to mention more people applied for various forms of government welfare assistance and those people that lost their jobs did not pay taxes anymore; on the contrary, they received government assistance.
 
.
The Russian military intervention in Syria has definitely negatively affected the Russian economy. Let's not pretend that this wasn't the case. The same goes for Saudi Arabia's intervention in Yemen and Turkey's recent intervention in Syria.
 
.
I don't care how serious you are. You don't know what you are talking about. Again the US economy was growing and deficit shrinking despite 2 wars.

The massive debt surge happened in 2009 when the economic world crisis began. In the US this was in large part because banks approved Millions of people for home loans that they could not afford to pay, at the same time housing prices surged far beyond what wages did. Millions of people defaulted on loans (hundreds of thousands to millions per home). The US bailed out those banks with 700 billion dollars, while many who went into default filled for bankruptcy in which the government payed off their debt. Millions of people also lost their jobs and were getting government checks each week not to mention more people applied for various forms of government welfare assistance and those people that lost their jobs did not pay taxes anymore; on the contrary, they received government assistance.
I know, you dont care about facts. I showed that Bush started taking loans (to finance the war) and that led to consequences .

War in Iraq costed 2 trillion $:

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-iraq-war-anniversary-idUSBRE92D0PG20130314

Thats equal to 10 years of total Russian budget revenues. You still think war is cheap thing and does not affect economy? :lol:
 
.
I know, you dont care about facts.





Don't make me laugh. You have given zero evidence for your claim and you speak about me not caring about facts when I went into detail about the financial crisis.



I showed that Bush started taking loans (to finance the war) and that led to consequences .

War in Iraq costed 2 trillion $:



You posted a chart about the debt ceiling, how can you be so ignorant? :lol:

That chart also shows that debt has risen since 1980 even when there was no wars. Under Bushe's term the US was in Iraq and Afghanistan for his entire term, while under Obama the US pulled out of Iraq years ago yet the debt under Obama has been out of control. This is a classic case of socialist Obama supporting and funding social programs in which he has no money to pay for thus the US just prints more money and adds to the debt.


Here are sources that confirm that everything I said about the financial crisis has been 100% correct. Notice there is zero mention of war contributing to the financial crisis.



http://positivemoney.org/issues/recessions-crisis/


Lending large sums of money into the property market pushes up the price of houses along with the level of personal debt. Interest has to be paid on all the loans that banks make, and with the debt rising quicker than incomes, eventually some people become unable to keep up with repayments. At this point, they stop repaying their loans, and banks find themselves in danger of going bankrupt




http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748704698004576104500524998280

The first argues that the primary cause was government intervention in the housing market. This intervention, principally through Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, inflated a housing bubble that triggered the crisis. This is the view expressed by one of our co-commissioners in a separate dissent.



https://www.google.com/amp/www.fool...actors-that-caused-or-contributed-to-the.aspx



Here are 25 reasons for the financial crisis, most has something to do with lending. Not 1 mention of the war. Zero.




http://www.reuters.com/article/us-iraq-war-anniversary-idUSBRE92D0PG20130314

Thats equal to 10 years of total Russian budget revenues. You still think war is cheap thing and does not affect economy? :lol:



What does the allocated Russian fiscal yearly budget have anything to do with American military spending in 2 wars that have been going on for 15 years?


You can pander your conspiracy theory in which you have zero proof but I have busted your argument with a multitude of sources.

Go continue crying along with the rest of your countrymen that you are unjustly treated after receiving over 100 billion in aid, free weapons and unparalleled political support. Parasites are never satisfied and always want more.
 
. .
Don't make me laugh. You have given zero evidence for your claim and you speak about me not caring about facts when I went into detail about the financial crisis.
I gave you two clear evidences:

1) War had enormous cost: over 2 trillion $.
2) To finance the war Bush took loans like crazy.

You think that money grow on trees however.

You posted a chart about the debt ceiling, how can you be so ignorant? :lol:
It showed debt rise too.

https://www.google.com/amp/www.fool...actors-that-caused-or-contributed-to-the.aspx

Here are 25 reasons for the financial crisis, most has something to do with lending. Not 1 mention of the war. Zero.
Fool.com is awesome source. But let me show another:

The financial crisis

The global financial crisis was due, at least in part, to the war.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/03/AR2010090302200.html

What does the allocated Russian fiscal yearly budget have anything to do with American military spending in 2 wars that have been going on for 15 years?
It shows that war is super expensive even for economy like US. For much smaller Russian economy it simply a disaster.

Go continue crying along with the rest of your countrymen that you are unjustly treated after receiving over 100 billion in aid, free weapons and unparalleled political support. Parasites are never satisfied and always want more.
Funny how u always go down to personal attacks. It only shows ur frustration and nothing else.
 
.
I gave you two clear evidences:

1) War had enormous cost: over 2 trillion $.




No according to your sources, The Washington(compost) which was written in 2010 the war cost over 3 trillion, by now it must be like 50 trillions, gazillion. Moreover, they themselves estimated that cost and have no evidence for their claim.



2) To finance the war Bush took loans like crazy.




What loans did Bush take to finance the war?






It showed debt rise too.




Really? You don't say? The US debt has been steadily rising for decades, war or no war.





Fool.com is awesome source. But let me show another:





Montley Fool is a financial publication. The Washington Compost has been busted making fake news and using phantom sources, in which they were humiliated recently by publishing some 200 news outlets that were supposedly working for the Russians and or "fake news". Moreover, their estimate of the war cost has no grounds, some liberal moron wrote the article and guessed the figures.




The financial crisis

The global financial crisis was due, at least in part, to the war.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/03/AR2010090302200.html





I explained to you many times what triggered the financial crisis in 2008/2009 and I provided a multitude of sources.




Funny how u always go down to personal attacks. It only shows ur frustration and nothing else.




What personal attacks? I called you ignorant, which is not a personal attack, I was merely highlighting the fact that you are uninformed. Other then that I told you to go cry about the UN fiasco since every Israeli is crying about it and as I recalled you were calling other countries ungrateful yet look at how Israel is behaving after all the money and political support it has received over more than 6 decades.

You think that's a personal attack? Not a single day goes by that you don't trash Russia, Iran or Syria and call the people murderers.
 
. .
pj-media-small.png

Child Jihadists Hunt Down, Execute Bound Prisoners in New ISIS Video
BY BRIDGET JOHNSON DECEMBER 29, 2016

(ISIS video screenshot)
The Islamic State released a grisly new video today showing child jihadists hunting down bound "apostates" in a live-fire training exercise.

The half-hour-long production, from ISIS headquarters in Raqqa, shows child jihadists -- boys about 9 to 12 years old -- crawling through brush carrying rifles and snipping through a barbed-wire fence toward a training compound with one-story buildings and dummies as targets.

(ISIS video screenshot)
(ISIS video screenshot)
Scenes in the video include the ISIS kids taking Quran classes, training with a variety of exercises, eating cafeteria-style lunches and watching ISIS films. A trainer wakes the kids from their dormitory-style bunks while it's dark outside for more training.

In another part of the video, kids wielding rifles give individual pledges to fight for ISIS; one boy has a cast on his arm.

(ISIS video screenshot)
(ISIS video screenshot)
Kids are then sent on an exercise through an abandoned building with some dummy targets in the rooms and a handful of live targets: prisoners with their hands zip-tied behind their backs, trying to elude the child jihadists in the multi-story, debris-strewn building.

(ISIS video screenshot)
(ISIS video screenshot)
One is labeled as a PKK member. A couple of the men weep after they are cornered, but the kids appear unmoved as the ISIS camera crew films the merciless encounters. The boys wound the prisoners at first in a gruesome game of cat-and-mouse, then finish off the prisoners at point-blank range.

One prisoner cornered on the rooftop throws himself off the edge before being shot to death by a child. The child goes downstairs to the man's body and shoots him several times in the head, anyway.

ISIS has often touted its "cubs" program to train young jihadists. In April, a video featuring all child jihadists showed the kids making threats in French translated into English.

"Beware, we have what we need to defend ourselves/Well-armed soldiers are ready to kill you... Beware, we are ready to fight back/Our swords are sharpened to slice necks," a French-speaking boy sung in the nasheed.

"Beware, men are ready to blow themselves up/Ready to respond to the evil you have brought/Beware, your roads will soon be rigged with mines/By well-trained and determined brothers/Beware, your end is already planned/Our warriors are everywhere, ready to sacrifice themselves."
 
.
pj-media-small.png

Child Jihadists Hunt Down, Execute Bound Prisoners in New ISIS Video
BY BRIDGET JOHNSON DECEMBER 29, 2016

(ISIS video screenshot)
The Islamic State released a grisly new video today showing child jihadists hunting down bound "apostates" in a live-fire training exercise.

The half-hour-long production, from ISIS headquarters in Raqqa, shows child jihadists -- boys about 9 to 12 years old -- crawling through brush carrying rifles and snipping through a barbed-wire fence toward a training compound with one-story buildings and dummies as targets.

(ISIS video screenshot)
(ISIS video screenshot)
Scenes in the video include the ISIS kids taking Quran classes, training with a variety of exercises, eating cafeteria-style lunches and watching ISIS films. A trainer wakes the kids from their dormitory-style bunks while it's dark outside for more training.

In another part of the video, kids wielding rifles give individual pledges to fight for ISIS; one boy has a cast on his arm.

(ISIS video screenshot)
(ISIS video screenshot)
Kids are then sent on an exercise through an abandoned building with some dummy targets in the rooms and a handful of live targets: prisoners with their hands zip-tied behind their backs, trying to elude the child jihadists in the multi-story, debris-strewn building.

(ISIS video screenshot)
(ISIS video screenshot)
One is labeled as a PKK member. A couple of the men weep after they are cornered, but the kids appear unmoved as the ISIS camera crew films the merciless encounters. The boys wound the prisoners at first in a gruesome game of cat-and-mouse, then finish off the prisoners at point-blank range.

One prisoner cornered on the rooftop throws himself off the edge before being shot to death by a child. The child goes downstairs to the man's body and shoots him several times in the head, anyway.

ISIS has often touted its "cubs" program to train young jihadists. In April, a video featuring all child jihadists showed the kids making threats in French translated into English.

"Beware, we have what we need to defend ourselves/Well-armed soldiers are ready to kill you... Beware, we are ready to fight back/Our swords are sharpened to slice necks," a French-speaking boy sung in the nasheed.

"Beware, men are ready to blow themselves up/Ready to respond to the evil you have brought/Beware, your roads will soon be rigged with mines/By well-trained and determined brothers/Beware, your end is already planned/Our warriors are everywhere, ready to sacrifice themselves."
and Syrian rebels are.in bed with thease Alqaeda and isis gangster
 
.
No according to your sources, The Washington(compost) which was written in 2010 the war cost over 3 trillion, by now it must be like 50 trillions, gazillion. Moreover, they themselves estimated that cost and have no evidence for their claim.
Price is growing with time. Here my original article:

The U.S. war in Iraq has cost $1.7 trillion with an additional $490 billion in benefits owed to war veterans, expenses that could grow to more than $6 trillion over the next four decades counting interest, a study released on Thursday said.


http://www.reuters.com/article/us-iraq-war-anniversary-idUSBRE92D0PG20130314

Financing failed Assad regime will also grow with time, thats only the beginning.

What loans did Bush take to finance the war?
Simple loans. Do u think money grow on trees?

Really? You don't say? The US debt has been steadily rising for decades, war or no war.
U can see that right before Bush grows was small:


_54236326_us_debt_464_corr.gif




Montley Fool is a financial publication. The Washington Compost has been busted making fake news and using phantom sources, in which they were humiliated recently by publishing some 200 news outlets that were supposedly working for the Russians and or "fake news". Moreover, their estimate of the war cost has no grounds, some liberal moron wrote the article and guessed the figures.
Washington Post is one of the most respected newspapers in the world. Montley Fool I dont think anyone knows what is that.

What personal attacks? I called you ignorant, which is not a personal attack, I was merely highlighting the fact that you are uninformed. Other then that I told you to go cry about the UN fiasco since every Israeli is crying about it and as I recalled you were calling other countries ungrateful yet look at how Israel is behaving after all the money and political support it has received over more than 6 decades.

You think that's a personal attack? Not a single day goes by that you don't trash Russia, Iran or Syria and call the people murderers.
Calling me names and speculating about my motivations is personal attacks. You are not my wife u dont have a clue about my motivations.

You insulted me about ur aircraft carrier and I was turned 200% right.
 
.
and Syrian rebels are.in bed with thease Alqaeda and isis gangster
I think you are painting with too broad a brush here.

Washington Post is one of the most respected newspapers in the world. Montley Fool I dont think anyone knows what is that.
W. Post is respected: liberal, but allows conservative views to be aired and not nearly as sickly biased as the NY Times. Motley Fool is known mostly for their analyses of financial investments, especially stocks; they don't have a bad record on that score.
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom