What's new

Swiss soil being used by terrorists against Pakistan

@DESERT FIGHTER ,how big is this movement,does it have any support in Pakistans Baluchistan?
Balochistan separatist movements enjoy about the same support as Nazism enjoys in some Western countries. It's tolerated by the Government (non-violence) but very condemned by the general public. Supporters are very few and are usually underground or abroad. Whatever is left of the armed resistance is rapidly surrendering or starving out in isolated mountain caves.
 
.
Here is the deal...

http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/hague05.asp
Article 1.
The territory of neutral Powers is inviolable.
However, there are conditions that a neutral power must meet in order for Article 1 to effective.

Art. 2.
Belligerents are forbidden to move troops or convoys of either munitions of war or supplies across the territory of a neutral Power.

Art. 3.
Belligerents are likewise forbidden to:

(a) Erect on the territory of a neutral Power a wireless telegraphy station or other apparatus for the purpose of communicating with belligerent forces on land or sea;

(b) Use any installation of this kind established by them before the war on the territory of a neutral Power for purely military purposes, and which has not been opened for the service of public messages.

Art. 4.
Corps of combatants cannot be formed nor recruiting agencies opened on the territory of a neutral Power to assist the belligerents.

Art. 5.
A neutral Power must not allow any of the acts referred to in Articles 2 to 4 to occur on its territory.

It is not called upon to punish acts in violation of its neutrality unless the said acts have been committed on its own territory.
Pakistan may consider Balochistan separatist movement as 'terrorists' under Pakistani laws, however, those laws are contained within Pakistan's borders.

Pakistan must prove that the separatist movement have committed acts outlined in articles 2 thru 4 BEFORE calling on the Swiss to execute article 5.

Article 5 is a serious charge. It means the government of claimed neutral power now must engage police -- or even military -- actions inside its borders to comply with the request of a foreign government who is an interested party -- a belligerent -- in a conflict. Article 5 must be executed in order for everyone to respect Article 1.

The Internet poses a serious problem for neutral powers vis-a-vis articles 3 and 4. The words 'wireless telegraphy' may reflect the communication technology of the time this convention was recognized and accepted, but the intention is clear: That a neutral power cannot allow communication -- from its territory -- by any belligerent to recruit to its cause.

However, this does not mean that the accuser have good cause. The intention of articles 3 and 4 was meant to denote obvious recruiting specifics such as offering payments, weapons, shelter, medical assistance, and assorted sundries usually associated with warfare and combat. If all the separatist movement does is offer its moral arguments as to why its cause deserve attention and allegiance, the neutral power is in the clear and Article 1 must be respected by all.

The more actions taken by the separatists outlined by this convention, the greater the impact of the moral argument and accusation from Pakistan. But Pakistan must show proofs beyond any reasonable doubt that violations occurred.
 
. .
Switzerland ambassador was summoned yesterday and grilled.

The response needs to be strong and one of the embassy high up should be expelled.
 
.
That 'Free Balochistan' will turn Pakistan into Greater Pakistan [India included] as prophesied 1400 years ago. Worry not, Greater Pakistan is here to stay!!! :D
 
.
letter-1505743297.jpg
letter-2-1505743299.jpg
 
.
That 'Free Balochistan' will turn Pakistan into Greater Pakistan [India included] as prophesied 1400 years ago. Worry not, Greater Pakistan is here to stay!!! :D
when this prophecy publish.... lolzz
 
.
Swiss ambassador be asked to leave Pakistan: Rabbani
Iftikhar A. KhanUpdated September 21, 2017
2
0

ISLAMABAD: Senate Chairman Mian Raza Rabbani said on Wednesday that the Swiss ambassador should be asked to leave because the latter’s country was allowing its soil to be used for terrorism in Pakistan.

The remarks came after Law Minister Zahid Hamid, on behalf of the foreign minister, made a statement in the house about a ‘free Balochistan’ poster campaign being run by a designated terrorist organisation — the Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA) — in Geneva, Switzerland.

Mr Rabbani said the Foreign Office should take some serious steps and convey its reservations to the Swiss government in the strongest possible terms because “terrorism was being exported to Pakistan from Swiss soil”.

Law minister says India behind ‘free Balochistan’ campaign in Geneva

He asked the Foreign Office to expel the Swiss envoy from Pakistan, amidst thumping of desks by members from both sides of the aisle. What was happening in Geneva was a clear violation of the international law and the UN charter, he observed.

ARTICLE CONTINUES AFTER AD
Zahid Hamid informed the Senate that Pakistan’s mission in Geneva had observed last week that posters titled “Free Baluchistan” had been displayed in well-frequented areas of Geneva, sponsored by “Baluchistan House”. These included paper and digital posters as well as banners posted on public transport vehicles. The Baluchistan House is said to be an affiliate of the BLA.

“The display of such publicity material is a serious violation of Pakistan’s territorial integrity and of international law and the UN charter. In view of the connections which India maintains with Baloch separatist leaders, and the fact that a large amount of money has been spent, it is obvious that India is behind this campaign,” he said, adding that use of Swiss soil by terrorists and foreign-sponsored secessionists for nefarious designs against Pakistan was totally unacceptable.

The law minister said the Swiss government had been asked to be alert about the presence of BLA terrorists or elements linked with such terrorists in Geneva. He said that in his second communication with the Swiss authorities he had asked them to immediately remove the posters and banners from public places and transport vehicles and prevent such recurrence in future.

“This year’s poster campaign by the Baloch dissident elements is being conducted by the affiliates of a declared terrorist organisation. According to the UN Security Council’s resolutions, states are obligated to not support terrorists or their affiliates, associates or abettors. Allowing this campaign and use of Swiss land is not only an attack on Pakistan’s territorial integrity, but also a violation of the international law, UN charter and Security Council resolutions. As a country that hosts the UN headquarters it is Switzerland’s duty to ensure that nothing against the international law and UN charter is conducted on its territory,” he remarked.

He pointed out that this was not the first time that such a thing had happened in Geneva. In March, a Pakistani Christian Association had placed banners in Geneva against the “violation of Christians’ rights in Pakistan”. An ordinary NGO could not have the means to do this, he said, adding that the matter had been raised with the Swiss authorities who said there was freedom of expression in the country and this was not in violation of the Swiss law.

Mr Hamid said this time as well the Swiss authorities were taking no steps to get the posters removed.

At this, Mr Rabbani said: “They are doing nothing. What are you doing? How can they allow use of their soil for exporting terrorism to Pakistan?”

Malpractices in CAA department
Setting a precedent in the country’s parliamentary history, the Senate chairman decided that the entire house would take up the issue of breach of privilege arising out of an apparently misleading reply to the question about implementation of the recommendations of a board of inquiry into malpractices in the Aero Medical Department of the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) last year.

Speaking on his motion, Senator Farhatullah Babar waved a copy of the CAA’s letter on the subject conveying approval of its director general to certain actions to be taken in the light of recommendations of the board of inquiry.

He said that instead of taking action, incomplete replies were furnished to the house. It appeared to be a case of cover-up, protecting some individuals and misleading the house, he said and demanded that the matter be referred to the privileges committee.

Mr Rabbani placed the matter before the house and sought opinion of the members on whether it should be sent to the committee or dealt with by the house itself. After ascertaining the sense of the house, he referred the matter to the privileges committee and said the house would take a decision on it after the committee examined the witnesses and the record in two weeks. “I find that prima facie there is a breach of privilege,” he said and ordered that notices be issued to the Aviation Division secretary and the CAA director general.

Minister for Parliamentary Affairs Sheikh Aftab Ahmad informed the house that according to the reply received, an officer found guilty of approving forged bills had been issued a show-cause notice, but the punishment awarded to him was merely a censure. Mr Rabbani and some members noted that this was not mere negligence, but a clear criminal act.

Published in Dawn, September 21st, 2017
 
.
Well, Pakistan has done a piss poor job of correctly portraying the BLA/MQM-London as terrorist organizations. Considering the West relies so much on Pakistani intelligence against terror organizations, it should have conditioned cooperation on successful action against this two organizations. Instead, it has turned a blind eye and now making frivolous screams on this latest Indian sponsored stunt designed to embarrass Pakistan. You simply have not addressed this issue with the seriousness with which it deserves. A country being asked to “do more” despite the immense financial and human sacrifices could have in the very least pointed to the BLA/MQM-London as a push back but it has failed to do so.

Another pathetic behavior from Pakistan. No wonder Ghani of Afghanistan was threatening “serious consequences” at the UN this week if Pakistan didn’t get its act together. One thing I have learned about Pakistanis is they are extremely proficient in inviting foreign aggression through their very meek behavior.
 
. .
For baluchistan
bla ,blf shit cetra

we should install anti RAw freedom proxy

i am sure it will work 100%
 
. . .
thanks for proving my point. Read your post again. You seem Uae ministry of info or interior employee. Work in online forums. I have seen lot of your type in different forum.
We don't have ministry of info.

When your mullah rhetoric gets refuted, you start with BS nonsense.
 
.
@DESERT FIGHTER ,how big is this movement,does it have any support in Pakistans Baluchistan?
It has little support in some under developed pockets of balochistan..

If we hold a referendum today.. the result would only favour Pak.

There are more Baloch people living in other provinces than Balochistan..

Apart from that Pashtuns and others form like 50% of balochistans population.

Here is the deal...

http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/hague05.asp

However, there are conditions that a neutral power must meet in order for Article 1 to effective.


Pakistan may consider Balochistan separatist movement as 'terrorists' under Pakistani laws, however, those laws are contained within Pakistan's borders.

Pakistan must prove that the separatist movement have committed acts outlined in articles 2 thru 4 BEFORE calling on the Swiss to execute article 5.

Article 5 is a serious charge. It means the government of claimed neutral power now must engage police -- or even military -- actions inside its borders to comply with the request of a foreign government who is an interested party -- a belligerent -- in a conflict. Article 5 must be executed in order for everyone to respect Article 1.

The Internet poses a serious problem for neutral powers vis-a-vis articles 3 and 4. The words 'wireless telegraphy' may reflect the communication technology of the time this convention was recognized and accepted, but the intention is clear: That a neutral power cannot allow communication -- from its territory -- by any belligerent to recruit to its cause.

However, this does not mean that the accuser have good cause. The intention of articles 3 and 4 was meant to denote obvious recruiting specifics such as offering payments, weapons, shelter, medical assistance, and assorted sundries usually associated with warfare and combat. If all the separatist movement does is offer its moral arguments as to why its cause deserve attention and allegiance, the neutral power is in the clear and Article 1 must be respected by all.

The more actions taken by the separatists outlined by this convention, the greater the impact of the moral argument and accusation from Pakistan. But Pakistan must show proofs beyond any reasonable doubt that violations occurred.

Well countries like UK consider them terrorists?

They kill labourers,traffic wardens,doctors,professors and target buses and trains.

And so called "political parties" have terrorist wings of the same name .. with an "army" or "liberation front" added...
 
.
Back
Top Bottom