Supreme Cout quashes presidential reference Sorry day

[Verve]

if you are not the owner of any assets, why would you be dragged to answer for it? the laws very clear about it,

You are wrong, plain and simple!

1969 law - I will get the exact name of the law/act that states all civil servants / office holders are accountable for the assets of their wives and children. And SC's very own Kana Chief Justice said in one judgement that all judges fall under this law as well!

@Tameem ke ras ghullay phir mehngay par gaye

Those rusgullay are giving him the runs now ...

 

[Baghial]

Questions is: who is the owner of the assets? QFI or his wife?

If QFI is the owner he must answer because he is the judge and cannot be corrupt.

If it is the wife, then it was her who requested the court to hear her. Hence! she has involved herself to be part of the proceedings and now must explain herself by providing the proof regarding the statement she recorded.

maybe you should read the case 1st, instead of commingto conclusion.

3 properties .in london, all in names of wife,
plus she provided her foreign account details ,how the property was bought ,loans also,

am not a fan of our law and justice, but.

Justice Qazi Faiz Isa is a judge who has been giving verdict after verdict on the cases that other judges refuse to hear because they are afraid of a backlash from the invisible forces.

so . the invisible , are afraid of 2023. when he will be chief justice
just clearing the way...........................till elections

You are wrong, plain and simple!

1969 law - I will get the exact name of the law/act that states all civil servants / office holders are accountable for the assets of their wives and children. And SC's very own Kana Chief Justice said in one judgement that all judges fall under this law as well!



Those rusgullay are giving him the runs now ...

so you mean, the full court hearing, and the 10 judges are all accomplice, or ignorant of the law , you seems to know only?

cows dont fly ,
Mi amigo

 

[Dil Pakistan]

maybe you should read the case 1st, instead of commingto conclusion.

3 properties .in london, all in names of wife,
plus she provided her foreign account details ,how the property was bought ,loans also,

am not a fan of our law and justice, but.

Justice Qazi Faiz Isa is a judge who has been giving verdict after verdict on the cases that other judges refuse to hear because they are afraid of a backlash from the invisible forces.

so . the invisible , are afraid of 2023. when he will be chief justice
just clearing the way...........................till elections

May be you need to understand and read what is the definition of money laundering?

All properties in the name of wife !!!

Where did the money come from?
She was a school teacher.

She said, she sold some of her property.

She needs to provide evidence....this is needs to be corroborated with her and her husbands tax returns.

If all is well, they will live happily ever after.

What is the problem with going through the screening if your hands are clean?

 

[Baghial]

May be you need to understand and read what is the definition of money laundering?

All properties in the name of wife !!!

Where did the money come from?
She was a school teacher.

She said, she sold some of her property.

She needs to provide evidence....this is needs to be corroborated with her and her husbands tax returns.

If all is well, they will live happily ever after.

What is the problem with going through the screening if your hands are clean?

wait n see. what FBR , will dig out now?

other wise , it was a malicious case, thats all.

 

[Verve]

1969 Service of Pakistan regulations - under this all civil servants and judges are accountable for the assets of their wives and children and failure to leads the jail sentence is for 3 years!

 

[Dil Pakistan]

wait n see. what FBR , will dig out now?

other wise , it was a malicious case, thats all.

Again! FBR does not need to dig anything .... it is up to QFI and family to provide the evidence (this is the law and has been applied in the case of Shareef family).

 

[Verve]

so you mean, the full court hearing, and the 10 judges are all accomplice, or ignorant of the law , you seems to know only?

This was discussed in the court and no SC judge said that these regulations do not apply to judges - you clearly are clueless and making stuff up!

Go read the 1969 Service of Pakistan regulations yourself instead of blindly arguing here ..

 

[Baghial]

The reference against Isa is based on the assumption that Isa did not declare the assets of his spouse and thus he is guilty of hiding information, which falls into the category of misconduct. The additional Attorney General Zahid E Ebrahim resigned in protest, stating that the reference against the judge was a “reckless attempt to browbeat the judiciary.” One wonders why Saqib Nisar was not tried for his misconduct by the Supreme Judicial Council, as he openly sided with PTI and the invisible forces to engineer the current political discourse

 

[Verve]

The reference against Isa is based on the assumption that Isa did not declare the assets of his spouse and thus he is guilty of hiding information, which falls into the category of misconduct. The additional Attorney General Zahid E Ebrahim resigned in protest, stating that the reference against the judge was a “reckless attempt to browbeat the judiciary.” One wonders why Saqib Nisar was not tried for his misconduct by the Supreme Judicial Council, as he openly sided with PTI and the invisible forces to engineer the current political discourse

You are still eating russgullay

 

[Baghial]

Even the dictator General Pervez Musharraf was not able to oust the judges of the Supreme Court through the Supreme Judicial Council and, in fact, that effort led to his fall from power. Isa is recognized by the bar associations as a man of dignity and honesty, and if the PTI government thinks it can fire him, it is digging its own grave. A government already struggling with a major economic crisis and the problems of misgovernance can hardly withstand the pressure of a countrywide lawyers’ movement supporting Justice Isa.

 

[Verve]

"This is a Decoranain Law made by a Dictator" Remarks by a Senior Judge during one of the Hearings of the case the Case.
This was the Behavior of some of the Judges.

But still a VALID law that the Kana Chief Justice himself included all judges to be under in one of his judgement during a democratic government!!!

 

[Baghial]

You are still eating russgullay

every day , amigo. russgullay,

general mushi tried to get rid of chaudhry ifthikar...but instead have to live in exxile

imran and military tried to get rid of isa.......... wait n see. where imran will be exiled. after 2023




The military, unhappy with Khan’s performance, has imposed its men on him in the shape of “advisers,” which has created a serious rift in the party. As of now, out of 48 ministers and advisers, only five belong to Imran’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI),

the complainant, Abdul Waheed Dogar was asked in the courtroom to read his complain but he expressed ignorance in that regard.
they he wanted his complain to be withdrawn? strange .......

 

[Syed1.]

My heartfelt commiserations to patwaris who were celebrating yesterday, Faiz Isa's own lawyer is saying they will file review petition because the SC essentially accepted what the government wanted.... Ya Allah @Tameem aur deegar khota khoron ko sabar o tahammul ata farma Ameen

 

[Mav3rick]

The reference against Isa is based on the assumption that Isa did not declare the assets of his spouse and thus he is guilty of hiding information, which falls into the category of misconduct. The additional Attorney General Zahid E Ebrahim resigned in protest, stating that the reference against the judge was a “reckless attempt to browbeat the judiciary.” One wonders why Saqib Nisar was not tried for his misconduct by the Supreme Judicial Council, as he openly sided with PTI and the invisible forces to engineer the current political discourse

Well, the answer is very clear, it is because the same powers were supporting Judiciary, PTI and other machines to achieve 1 common goal. Too bad that they failed to realize what would happen to the country by blindly following a supremely incompetent, egoistic, nepotistic and most likely corrupt politician and PTI overall. Would have been better had they installed a technocrat Government or just plain taken over again.

 

[Baghial]

most people wont remember
generals mushraf, and ch iftikhar saga,
intrestinly, the charges against were written in an application, by no other than
advocate NAEEM BOKHARI..............pti NOW

GENERAL mushi after sacking chaudhry,

put justice javeed iqbal , in seat of chaudhry


NOW THE NAB , CHIEF.


there is a list of more then 100 mushi coharts, in PTI.( but a different opinion, or facts) arent accepted on PDF.



people may never know who sajida ch , a civil judge from gujjar khan did on 17 march 2007


she put the first nail in mushi,s coffin..