While I'm willing to give Narendra Modi the benefit of doubt in the actual charge of collusion, the 2002 riots remain a terrible blot on his image. The fact that he is yet to express any remorse at the loss of life that occurred on his watch remains extremely unfortunate. The PM's job is not just that of an administrator, that is the Cabinet Secretary's job. The PM must be able to carry all sections of people with him & at the very least be not someone who is unacceptable to a sizable population of this country, especially on grounds of perceived bias.
I don't know why some people expect absolute perfection from Narendra Modi .
Did you use same yardstick for other politicians too ??
congress partymen led from the front by close friends of Rajiv Gandhi killed 10,000 sikh and Delhi police didn't even raise finger ,How many seculars(pseudos) actually boycotted congress for this,...none instead they are considered paragons of secularism ??
Why ?? 'cause unlike muslims who number is large in many states, sikhs are mostly confined to punjab.
Sikh lives are expendable on the consideration of vote bank politics.
Now lets comes to question of perceived biased , you have to consider whose perception we are talking about.
People Gujarat including Muslims are very happy with Modi for good governance and development. There has been no case of discrimination against muslims or riots in last ten years which it used to be an yearly phenomena in gujaat . Even Muslims candidates of BJP are winning in election.
so called perception is actually very tiny at least in Gujarat ,so obviously Modi don't give sh** .
Outside Gugarat anti modi campaign is used tool to emotionally blackmail Muslims vote to for so called secular parties.
Like everything else this tactics too suffers from diminishing returns over the years and secular parties must provide good governance which on they are falling apart and destined to meet the electoral fate of Lalu yadav and Karunanidhi.
Modi is unstoppable not because he is anti muslims (definitely he isn't) , but because he's good at his job.