Yes.Less population and more kings.
I think everyone wants that "India" back.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes.Less population and more kings.
I think everyone wants that "India" back.
No one knows,there are many theories about that.Vedas have mentioned that and by many accounts it's either a dried river in today's Pakistan or Helmand River on top of that exact date of composition of Vedas is unknown,they seem to be ancient than people think.
On what basis have you arrived at that conclusion? He visited as far as Bengal and Assam apart from Northern India.Looks like a comparison of Indus valley to Tibet.
Don't use us for your propaganda against China.These are accounts of Sulaiman al-Tajir, the Persian merchant who traveled to both India & China in the year 850 AD.
Source: https://www.amazon.in/Mohammedan-Travellers-Translated-Illustrations-Inquiries/dp/1140729454
Sulaiman al-Tajir, the Persian merchant who traveled to both India & China sometime in the year 850 CE made some interesting observations on both countries. He starts by saying India is twice the size of China, but not as densely populated.
View attachment 743947
He says the chinese had no religious science of their own. Each of their philosophies was borrowed from India. The chinese held Indians as their teachers. (2)
View attachment 743949
On differences between how houses were built. Chinese mostly used wood. Indians built houses made of stones, plaster & bricks. (3)
View attachment 743950
Regarding personal hygiene. Indians paid high importance to bathing everyday, sometimes several times in a day & also oral hygiene. Indians wouldn't eat without cleaning mouth. Also the Chinese were NOT known to clean up after doing the (4)
View attachment 743951
On dietary & praying habits. 1) Rice was the staple diet of both countries.
2) Sulaiman found chinese praying style closer to his own religion
3) Indians grew long facial hair. (5)
View attachment 743952
Note: All these were recorded when India was being ruled by 3 great empires. Pratihara, Pala & Rashtrakuta.
They were always searching for Indus Valley civilisation,something which was as advance as Egyptian civilisation.Early records wrote it Indica,even GoI admits that word India is name of river Indus.When Christopher Columbus sailed out for 'India' in the year 1492, he missed the direction and reached the Americas.
Columbus called the inhabitants of the lands that he visited indios (Spanish for "Indians")
Don't use us for your propaganda against China.
Umm...how is stating thoughts of a 9th century Persian equivalent to using Iran for propaganda against China?Don't use us for your propaganda against China.
Calm down rambo,What has Darius to do with 850AD Sulayman from an Arab province?
Go back to the western theater
Maybe it's you that needs to calm downCalm down rambo,
You are using Iranians for your propaganda against the nation of China.Umm...how is stating thoughts of a 9th century Persian equivalent to using Iran for propaganda against China?
How do views of 9th century Persian traveler affect 21st century Iran-China relationship? Will 9th century Sulaiman's views be responsible for breaking of Iran-China relations in 21st century? I hope you are fine.You are using Iranians for your propaganda against the nation of China.
You Indians are pretty funny.. trying everything to discredit your ''enemies''. If you want to spread propaganda it is fine but don't do it in the name of Iranians.How do views of 9th century Persian traveler affect 21st century Iran-China relationship? Will 9th century Sulaiman's views be responsible for breaking of Iran-China relations in 21st century? I hope you are fine.
That 9th century traveler happens to be 'Persian'. It's not like he is using him purposely because he is 'Persian'. Understand the difference? And a thread in PDF doesn't affect national policy, got it?You Indians are pretty funny.. trying everything to discredit your ''enemies''. If you want to spread propaganda it is fine but don't do it in the name of Iranians.
Wrong, it includes parts of present day India as well as Pakistan.Whenever you see anywhere "ancient India" described by ancient historians, that means only today's Pakistan,it has nothing to do with modern India mostly.
Please check comment #18Highly possible that Our Farsi traveler was exploring NW Indian part which is now Southern and Eastern Pakistan.