What's new

Suicide Bomb Blasts In Iran At Least 20 Dead

ای ایران;1004505 said:
This is what Iranians believe is alot closer to the truth as you can see from the latest remarks by Iranian officials:

Still a belief which is closer to truth but may not be a truth. Better way is to engage authorities privately rather than hurling accusations which will not help. It is also a matter of security lapse on part of Iranian authorities. What will you say about that?
 
May the innocent victims find peace in Heaven. This is tragic indeed if post #40 is true. First Uganda and now this.
 
ای ایران;1002277 said:
Anger is definitely beginning to build in Iran over this. I wonder, if Pakistan's intelligence agencies have nothing to hide and are not allowing Jondallah to shelter in Pakistan, then they should allow Iranian police forces to undertake an operation against Jondallah camps and safe havens in Pakistani territory.

Iran should also first close Indian consulate in Zahidan that is centers of terrorist activities in Pakistan. There is no logic for Indian consulate in Zahidan other than providing logistic support for terrorism in Pakistan.
 
Iran should also first close Indian consulate in Zahidan that is centers of terrorist activities in Pakistan. There is no logic for Indian consulate in Zahidan other than providing logistic support for terrorism in Pakistan.

Turning a blind eye to what India has been doing in that region with support from the great satan is a grave mistake on the part of Iran. In the end, india will help the great satan to close the net on Iran. Iran and Pakistan have both been encircled by the great satan for their systematic destruction, in the name of fighting terror. India and Israel are part of this American design to neutralise Iran and Pakistan.
 
Turning a blind eye to what India has been doing in that region with support from the great satan is a grave mistake on the part of Iran. In the end, india will help the great satan to close the net on Iran. Iran and Pakistan have both been encircled by the great satan for their systematic destruction, in the name of fighting terror. India and Israel are part of this American design to neutralise Iran and Pakistan.

The country of Iran is the largest supporter of terrorism in the world. They have made the export of IUD a state industry. The people killed here were Iranian soldiers and the revolutionary guard, all legitmate targets. This is not even terrorism. This is simply one sect of Muslims killing another sect of Muslims.. Same O, Same O for 1500 years.
 
Last edited:
The country of Iran is the largest supporter of terrorism in the world. They have made the export of IUD a state industry. The people killed here were Iranian soldiers and the revolutionary guard, all legitmate targets. This is not even terrorism. This is simply one sect of Muslims killing another sect of Muslims.. Same O, Same O for 1500 years.


The US is the largest supporter of terrorism and Jundallah is its latest proof of that. CIA is a terrorist outfit.
 
Still a belief which is closer to truth but may not be a truth. Better way is to engage authorities privately rather than hurling accusations which will not help. It is also a matter of security lapse on part of Iranian authorities. What will you say about that?

The reason Iranian officials nowadays openly criticize Pakistan to the media is because private negotiations with the Pakistani authorities have failed to produce any solution to these problems and so, Iranian officials are forced to express their frustration with Pakistan publicly too. Whatever Iranian officials do communicate to Pakistan each time one of these terrorist attacks occur would be much worse no doubt that what they criticize Pakistan for in the Iranian media, the parliament and other public platforms in Iran.

Iran should also first close Indian consulate in Zahidan that is centers of terrorist activities in Pakistan. There is no logic for Indian consulate in Zahidan other than providing logistic support for terrorism in Pakistan.

The Indian consulate in Zahedan has existed there since before your country even came into existence. So why should Iran close it? And how exactly do the Indians use it to support terrorism in Pakistan? There is no evidence of this at all, and neither would the I.R allow it.

The country of Iran is the largest supporter of terrorism in the world. They have made the export of IUD a state industry. The people killed here were Iranian soldiers and the revolutionary guard, all legitmate targets. This is not even terrorism. This is simply one sect of Muslims killing another sect of Muslims.. Same O, Same O for 1500 years.

The majority of people killed in the attack were ordinary civilians. It was a MOSQUE that was attacked, not a military outpost. The main Shi'ite Mosque in Zahedan.
 
ای ایران;1011985 said:
The Indian consulate in Zahedan has existed there since before your country even came into existence. So why should Iran close it? And how exactly do the Indians use it to support terrorism in Pakistan? There is no evidence of this at all, and neither would the I.R allow it.

by sending trained local shia terrorists into pakistan from iranian border.. and to gather intelligence from balochistan.

when india has no business now with iranian border regions, so there is no need to have an indian consulate in the border with pakistan
 
ای ایران;1011985 said:
The reason Iranian officials nowadays openly criticize Pakistan to the media is because private negotiations with the Pakistani authorities have failed to produce any solution to these problems and so, Iranian officials are forced to express their frustration with Pakistan publicly too.

the issues in Iranian and Pakistani Baluchistan are mutually shared. Problems exist on both sides of the border; dont single us out or make offensive statements against our security forces, intelligence services or government.

the solution to these problems is to invest in this underdevelopled region, formalize and legitimize the trade that goes on, create an effective anti narcotics force, and of course bring all the different local stakeholders to the table --even the rebel group members who are willing to talk constructively


Iran ready for security talks with Pak | Pakistan | News | Newspaper | Daily | English | Online


The Indian consulate in Zahedan has existed there since before your country even came into existence. So why should Iran close it?

India has 3 consulates in Iran(compare this to the number of consulates in United States — just four). Of course this seems minuscule to the whopping 9 consulates in Afghanistan, but still.

You are aware of the sensitive nature of Pakistan-hindustan relations. You are also aware that Zahedan is at the doorstep of Quetta by bus. You are ALSO aware that hindustan is supporting Baluch rebels directly and indirectly through channels, in an effort to create disturbance in Pakistani Baluchistan (this has repercussions against Iranian Sistan va Baluchestan too)

wake up bro, wake up. We dont care how long that consulate has been there. It should be shut down.


And how exactly do the Indians use it to support terrorism in Pakistan? There is no evidence of this at all, and neither would the I.R allow it.

the hindustanys hire properties in the area where some people who cross over from Afghanistan to Pakistan are ''briefed''....i have read a lot of reports about this; though i doubt their operations in Zahedan are as active as they are in Afghanistan border region where hindustanys have several consulates

incidentally, although Revolutionary Guards monitor Zahedan-Taftan road, there is no regular check post of Pasdaran on the road between Khash and Jalq, making it easy for all kinds of elements to cross here and there easily (though this isnt your fault per se, the geography is difficult)


The majority of people killed in the attack were ordinary civilians. It was a MOSQUE that was attacked, not a military outpost. The main Shi'ite Mosque in Zahedan.

it was a disgusting terrorist attack. And I think Captain America's post should be reported. It was a savage attack at a religious place, and to NOT condemn it in all forms just shows that some people (especially in the west) are very selective when it comes to defining what is and what is not ''terrorism''

and on behalf of my country I would extend a consoling hand to my Iranian brothers next door


it's obvious that a game is being played and that ''Jundollah'' is a cat's paw for enemies of Iran.....but dont make the mistake of blaming Pakistan for something we are not responsible for alone



we are all responsible collectively
 

Iran annually spends billions of dollars on its both armed proxies, Hezbollah in Lebanon, and Hamas in Gaza, and on many other terrorist and fundamental armed organizations in Yemen, Iraq and other Arab states. Iran and Syria openly encourage, instigate, fund, guide, train, and organize and use all the terrorist groups in the Middle East that advocate for havoc, jihad, intolerance, sectarianism and hatred. I just cant get too excited when some one does the same thing to Iran especially when they are targeting the Iranian Revolutionary Guard.
 
The country of Iran is the largest supporter of terrorism in the world.

I disagree based on two points. One, terrorism is relative term based on an individual's own perception-- 'one man's hero is another man's enemy.' Two, as for being the largest, it would be on the list if various definitions of terrorism are accepted, but by no means the largest given the fact that it is superseded by other states such as the United States and Israel.

The people killed here were Iranian soldiers and the revolutionary guard, all legitmate targets.

False. The people killed for Iranian civilians i.e not associated to the security forces. If they appear legtimate to you in this circumstance, then perhaps you should apply the same logic is other circumstances as well.

Iran annually spends billions of dollars on its both armed proxies, Hezbollah in Lebanon, and Hamas in Gaza, and on many other terrorist and fundamental armed organizations in Yemen, Iraq and other Arab states.

Refer to the point above on classifying parties as "terrorist." For instance, those fighting against Soviet and pro-Soviet forces in Afghanistan during the 80s were labeled as resistance by US-based media outlets but 20 years later they were labeled as terrorists.

Iran and Syria openly encourage, instigate, fund, guide, train, and organize and use all the terrorist groups in the Middle East that advocate for havoc, jihad, intolerance, sectarianism and hatred.

As for the groups being terrorists, that is again, a subject of debate. The situation nevertheless has to be put in the proper context. One, the core issue that encourages these people is a feeling of injustice or deprivation apart from any other factor which has to be very real to find justification. Two, they reflect back the sentiment which they receive themselves.

I just cant get too excited when some one does the same thing to Iran especially when they are targeting the Iranian Revolutionary Guard.

Iran has a civilian, non-military/ para-military, population as well. In this case, they were targets and not any Iranian state-actor.
 
I disagree based on two points. One, terrorism is relative term based on an individual's own perception-- 'one man's hero is another man's enemy.'

Refer to the point above on classifying parties as "terrorist." For instance, those fighting against Soviet and pro-Soviet forces in Afghanistan during the 80s were labeled as resistance by US-based media outlets but 20 years later they were labeled as terrorists.
And the target type influences that perception. The Soviet military is not civilians.
 
ای ایران;1003042 said:
Mate what are you talking about? Over 60% of Pakistanis live on less than $2 a day, whereas only around 8% of Iranians do.

Yeah so? You still have poverty in your country. Anyways I don't know why you're on this forum if all you're here to do is to insult and make snide remarks about Pakistan. You seem to think we actually care about Iran and its opinions, when thats def not true.
 
ای ایران;1001002 said:
The regime in Iran believes that in the past Jondollah has been in contact with Pakistani agents. Ahamdinejad himself has said this.

Yeah without any proof, it doesn't matter what your regime thinks. Ahamdinejad has also lot a stupid things, so he's not credible. Pakistani agents would be stupid to help a group that would also cause trouble in Pakistani Balochistan when theres already enough trouble there. Their probably getting help from the BLA which has no ties to the Pakistani state.
 
Last edited:
by sending trained local shia terrorists into pakistan from iranian border.. and to gather intelligence from balochistan.

If I understand you right, you are alleging that India is supporting "local Shi'a terrorists" and that too from the Iran-Pakistan border?

Secondly, if they are local that would mean that they are Baluch i.e so you are of the argument that India is supporting a Shi'a Baloch uprising in Pakistani Baluchistan?

Thirdly, this would necessitate purpose ignorance on the part of Tehran or rather a free-hand from Tehran.

I would disagree with you in entirety on that. For one thing, the religious demographics of either Pakistani or Iranian Baluchistan do would be unable to render this as even a possibility. The prime reason being that the Baluch, weather in Pakistan or Iran, are overwhelmingly of different Sunn'ite denominations.

Also, Iran is not keen on allowing leverage to any element there or elsewhere in Iran that is not a part of the Iranian state. For a foreign state to conduct such grandiose operations from within the Iranian border would be a, mind the language, ludicrous proposition.

Moreover, this is an indirect way of saying Iran and India are behind all, if any, radical Shi'a outfits in Pakistan. This cannot even be substantiated. As such, the same statement can be reflected by an Iranian towards Pakistan in reverse using the same faulty logic.
 

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom