saiyan0321
PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2012
- Messages
- 6,455
- Reaction score
- 121
- Country
- Location
LOLOL.
@saiyan0321 must be having a mild heart-attack somewhere, reading this.
Ask him if he needs a clerk. I could do with the money.
Lollzz it was good drafting joe. you are not making a constitution nor making some complicated legal code where it must be formed in such a manner that it contains no loopholes. A simple sentence that contains a paragraph within that sentence is enough. You involve lawyers in this and it would have become something that only lawyers could interpret. Alot better and very professional.
Actually, it IS a general rule of the Forum. It's just that none of us read the Rules!
And thats the problem. The rules and regulations are the creation of a sovereign authority and like all rules and regulations in the world ( whether that sovereign authority is the monarch, the legislative, or the head of the forum), they hold a weak symbiotic relationship with the populace relative to a moral code. you would see that many times courts highlight the moral relationship of the society and law. When the prosecutor sends a case to the magistrate, in his comments he always uses the sentence that the prosecution of this person is imperative for the moral standing of the society. The reason for this is that the laws and rules are the implementation of a third party (whether that third party claims representation of the populace or gives reason of its relation with the moral code but it is still the construct of the third party) thus the relationship with another is weak however a moral code is something that we agree to it ourselves and tell ourselves to follow something we are not obliged to follow. You dont have to be nice to Indians or Pakistanis but you are because that is your moral code. Its relationship with the self is far more stronger.
This is why you hear many jurists say respect the law, treat the law as your own and love the law so that the symbiotic relationship between the two increases. Let me give you an example. Why were the constitutions of 1958, 1962 and 1973 were so easily abrogated in 1958, 1969 and 1977 whereas in the same country and in the same populace it is difficult as hell to have them stop from shaking hands or hugging people during greetings even if temporarily. Why? you would say those two have no relation. One is the moral standing of a person and the other is the constitution passed by a parliament and there you go. That is the explanation. One is felt dear by the people and the other is something far off, passed by somebody we dont know. What does it concern us. This imbalance is the reason why we read philosophers and jurists talk nonstop on rule of law and how laws should be loved. From ibn e Khaldun to john locke all highlighted on rule of law and moral relationship of laws. They highlighted natural law to expand the symbiotic relationship between the two.
This code may work in this line. I hope it does and as i told you before, if implemented correctly coupled with posters who are sticking to their own codes, similar to nature as this one, you guys can become a very good intellectual group within the Indian community as well as the entire PDF community itself that may trump many other posters. Frankly Pakistani posters should spend their time doing something similar rather than make plans on secret coups on moderation otherwise they will be left behind and the moral high ground will be taken away.
Same principle can be applied here. The rules and regulations are extensive but they are similar to the rules and regulations in real life.