What's new

‘Sub-conventional war’ threat makes India worry

Banglar Bir

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Mar 19, 2006
Messages
7,805
Reaction score
-3
Country
United States
Location
United States
‘Sub-conventional war’ threat makes India worry
SAM Report, May 21, 2017

Mumbai_26-11_4.jpg

A possible threat of ‘sub-conventional war’ has made India so worried that, in an unprecedented move, the country’s Chief of Air Staff, reportedly has written a personal letter to each officer of the Indian Air Force (IAF), asking them “to be prepared for operations with our present holdings, at a very short notice”.

The letter said, “In the present scenario, there is an ever-persistent sub-conventional threat. Therefore, we need to be prepared for operations with our present holdings, at a very short notice.”

According to the Indian Express, the letter, signed March 30, was written three months after ACM Dhanoa took over as IAF Chief and is being posted and delivered to each of the nearly 12,000 officers of the force.

The “sub-conventional threat” is said to be a reference to the ‘proxy war’ by Pakistan, which is reflected in the increasing number of terror attacks on military camps and the rising public unrest in Jammu and Kashmir.

This is the first time that an IAF chief has written a personal letter to all officers, although two Army Chiefs Field Marshal (then General) K M Cariappa on 1 May 1950 and General K Sundarji on 1 February 1986 have penned similar missives, said the newspaper.

Indian media reported that the IAF is authorised 42 squadrons of fighter aircraft but its current holding is down to 33. A deal for 36 Rafale fighters, signed with France, and a decision to induct indigenous Tejas fighters will barely make up for the de-induction of the MIG series of fighters from the fleet.

The media leaks the AIF chief’s letter at a time when Prime Minister Modi is taking preparation to visit Israel in early July with a view to strengthen Indian defence armory, particularly its air defence system.

India has already become one of the largest buyers of Israeli military hardware with annual defense deals worth over $1 billion.

This week India’s Western Naval Command conducted a trial firing of a medium-range surface-to-air missile, which was jointly developed by India and Israel.

In addition to this, several joint Indian-Israeli missile programs are underway, including the Long-Range Surface to Air Missile (LR-SAM) system, which will be deployed on Indian Navy warships.

In Febuary 2017, Modi approved a $2.5 billion deal to purchase 40 units of Israeli-developed Medium Range Surface to Air Defense Missile (MR-SAM) system, known in Israel as the Barak 8.
http://southasianmonitor.com/2017/05/21/sub-conventional-war-threat-makes-india-worry/
 
.
How "IAF" will respond to pak proxy war?
 
. . . .
Wrong. It has already been clarified that a conventional war is not possible.

ConVentional war has already happened after Nuclear tests in Kargil.

Limited conventional conflict is a possibility, your muscle flexing notwithstanding.

Your Generals who gift themselves acres of land after retirement and have their children settled abroad won't want their investment decimated by radiation. Neither are they such fools as to detonate battlefield nukes in their own territory near Lahore. It's all a bluff. The worst that will happen is, India will make rapid strikes and go back without prolonging the conflict or holding any territory.

However, I personally believe that India's best option is through covert means rather than overt.

BTW, India has been fighting this 'sub-conventional war' since 1990. 27 years have passed and Pakistan did everything it could to foster terrorism in India. Before that there was the Khalistan thingy.

My point is, what new can Pakistan do now that it hasn't already done?

and then there's another point. Any sane man will accept that the Mumbbai 2008 attacks caused more damage to Pakistan than they did to India.

India lost some lives. Pakistan lost its face. Today no country in the world takes Pakistan seriously on terrorism issue.
 
Last edited:
.
Don't worry about land of our generals, they would be better fighters then your hungry and disgraced generals any day.


ConVentional war has already happened after Nuclear tests in Kargil.

Limited conventional conflict is a possibility, your muscle flexing notwithstanding.

Your Generals who gift themselves acres of land after retirement and have their children settled abroad won't want their investment decimated by radiation. Neither are they such fools as to detonate battlefield nukes in their own territory near Lahore. It's all a bluff. The worst that will happen is, India will make rapid strikes and go back without prolonging the conflict or holding any territory.

However, I personally believe that India's best option is through covert means rather than overt.

BTW, India has been fighting this 'sub-conventional war' since 1990. 27 years have passed and Pakistan did everything it could to foster terrorism in India. Before that there was the Khalistan thingy.

My point is, what new can Pakistan do now that it hasn't already done?

and then there's another point. Any sane man will accept that the Mumbbai 2008 attacks caused more damage to Pakistan than they did to India.

India lost some lives. Pakistan lost its face. Today no country in the world takes Pakistan seriously on terrorism issue.
 
. .
ConVentional war has already happened after Nuclear tests in Kargil.

Limited conventional conflict is a possibility, your muscle flexing notwithstanding.

Your Generals who gift themselves acres of land after retirement and have their children settled abroad won't want their investment decimated by radiation. Neither are they such fools as to detonate battlefield nukes in their own territory near Lahore. It's all a bluff. The worst that will happen is, India will make rapid strikes and go back without prolonging the conflict or holding any territory.

However, I personally believe that India's best option is through covert means rather than overt.

BTW, India has been fighting this 'sub-conventional war' since 1990. 27 years have passed and Pakistan did everything it could to foster terrorism in India. Before that there was the Khalistan thingy.

My point is, what new can Pakistan do now that it hasn't already done?

and then there's another point. Any sane man will accept that the Mumbbai 2008 attacks caused more damage to Pakistan than they did to India.

India lost some lives. Pakistan lost its face. Today no country in the world takes Pakistan seriously on terrorism issue.



Oh really????????...........coming from the same group of people who vehemently proclaimed that it is impossible for Pakistan to ever become a nuclear weapons state with or without Chinese assistance. That the whole world particularly the West, Russia and Europe would stop it..........:disagree:...........reality and accurate predictions for some reason don't like indians..............:lol:
 
.
Oh really????????...........coming from the same group of people who vehemently proclaimed that it is impossible for Pakistan to ever become a nuclear weapons state with or without Chinese assistance. That the whole world particularly the West, Russia and Europe would stop it..........:disagree:...........reality and accurate predictions for some reason don't like indians..............:lol:

Let's not get started about what people have and haven't claimed in the past. Your side aint very pretty and I wouldn't wanna go there on PDF.
 
.
Guess you must love radiation.

Shove ur cheap nuclear threat where it belongs dude. Guess being courteseous n sensible is not taught in every household and just to massage ur worthless @#$% you quoted a week long message of mine to puke ur worthless nuclear shite... welcome to my ignore list...
 
Last edited:
.
Shove ur cheap nuclear threat where it belongs dude. Guess being courteseous n sensible is not taught in every household and just to massage ur worthless @#$% you quoted a week long message of mine to puke ur worthless nuclear shite... welcome to my ignore list...

Someone's upset lol

Nuke threat very early on this thread.
Try to put some conventional fight.

Nope, only idiots like you who crave war like to ignore nukes.
 
. .
First Indian military should prepare some good meals for their soldiers to help them manage their arms in a safe way to avoid accidental fire in the future.after that they should talk about war..
 
. .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom