KENT
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2007
- Messages
- 556
- Reaction score
- 0
Man, I have never seen a person lie with straight face, than you.
Was that lie? now I am completely assure myself, as whatever not in line with your thinking, you view them as a lie.
Why should anything written by some obscure fellow,
Was he obscure? so now we will need someone like you who will validate the percentile of Composites in MKI? Oh my goodness......
The person who is running the Vayu-sena tripod is sounding obscure to Titanum, now I am 1000% sure that the things that doesn't suite to the sensitivity of Tiatnium, he call them obsure.
should be my line of thinking. I am merely looking for facts, is MKI has "extensive" composite or not.
I had provided you with three links which are more then enough to validate the extensive proporation of composite in MKI, even I had quoted former PAF air commerade, now Titanium you want to tell me all those sources and former PAF air commerade are untruthfull. One can clearly see the level of your emotions
That person who has written is not sure of it either.........."rumoured to be 6%" . Is that fact for you???
Yes, but at the same time he also acknowledge the fact that extensive use of composites. His skeptics was in terms of percentile. According to him it could be that 6% of composite are more then enough to term it as extensive. The Percentage figure could be anything, or rather you want to tell me provide me the souce which quote Extensive use of composite in airframe = 100% composite usage in airframe.
When you are not sure, what is the purpose of mentioning ..........???
You should asked this question to yourself. I had provided 4 sources including former fame PAF personnel to validate my claim. Now its upto wheather they are more then enough to suite your sensitivity or not.
One more hedge........
Just because it doesn't suiting to your percentile equations.
When we talk of percentage..........1% is not extensive.
So what it should be? you mean extensive usage of composites = 100% usage of composites
If, on the other hand we are talking of absolute weightage.............yes considering the total weight of SU-30.
When your line of thinking find it hard to parallel itself with what my provided sources then now you came and asking me regarding weight reduction.
Man, move yourself 180 degree vertically and go and read my previous posting, I had quoted use of alongwith weight reduction, I had claim extensive composites to validate my claim of reduction in RCS.
Lo and behold...........Former PAF guy will provide evidence regarding the composite usage in SU-30MKI
Yes, since even he didn't have any problem in digesting the theory of extensive use of composite that he has admitted in his article.
How lame can you get.........the guy would have most probably looked at the same source that you provided to base his article.
So this means that whatever the sources that I had provided are correct and authentic which even prompted former PAF air commerade to admit in his article that there is really an extensive usage of composite in Su-30MKI.
Now Titanium, even you can't prove my sources as baseless or fun with this particuler statment, but from now on for a god sake don't come and tell me that whatever PAF air commerde admitted is untruthful.
Yes, afterall you have admitted.