TopCat
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2008
- Messages
- 15,736
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
The Chakmas were refugees from Arakan.
They had conflicts with Rakhine people in Arakan about two hundred years ago - from more than one account I have read in the past few years. They were originally from Shan areas in China, and eventually moved to Arakan before this conflict to settle and conduct agriculture. It seems Rohingyas (who were more organized) could resist these issues violently with the Rakhine, but not the Chakmas who were a more pacified population.
The Rakhine completely drove out the Chakma (alongwith their royal family) and they moved to and settled around a few Hill Tract areas, such as Rangamati, Barakal and Chandraghona upstream on the banks of the Karnaphuli as these were safer areas for them. Please google it. Rest of the uninformed Bullsh*t merchants can just shut their trap.
This is logical - because if the Chakmas were settled for more than two hundred years, where is their 'civilization'?? There are zero civilized structures (signs of long period of settlement) in Rangamati and no sign of any land or infra improvements before Bengalis moved in.
These are just itinerant vagrants, migrants and assorted troublemakers. Unfortunately that is the legacy. read more here about how the British tamed these hill-dwellers,
https://books.google.com/books?id=GZtEAQAAMAAJ&pg=PR17&dq=bohmong+circle&hl=en#v=onepage&q=bohmong circle&f=false
A big number of Chakma still live in Arakan.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daingnet_people
A lot people write all kind of craps without acutally knowing the Chakma themselves.
The Arakanese or Burmese Chakma speak a language similar to Rohingya too(Bengali). If they were from China or burma they would had spoken something like Rakhine or Marma people the derivatives of Burmese.
Daingnet people is the proof that Chakmas actually moved from north to south not south to north.