What's new

Strikes on Pakistan can create nuclear holocaust: Feroz Khan

lolzzz Indians have been talking endlessly about surgical strikes time and again and you came up with such a reply oh look look US is doin so we don't need :p.

The point is nobody can afford a war . everyone is not US. You don't have any weapons' business to expand by war

Those who suggest surgical strikes are entitled to their opinion.

I agree war is too expensive an event to go in for unless all other options are exhausted .

As of now they haven't.

The Suicide bombers & TTP are doing a fine job as of now . Why would India want to ' upset ' them ?
 
.
America is close to getting bankerrupt so indian fantasy about america delivering that fatal blow to Pakistan shall remain a fantasy

Which part of my post gave the impression of a fatal blow ?

A dead Pakistan for India is worse than a living one.

India does not want Pakistan to die for if it does then all the acid created by ISI will flow eastwards. It suits India well for Pakistan to remain and bear the consequences of what it does / did.
 
.
Which part of my post gave the impression of a fatal blow ?

A dead Pakistan for India is worse than a living one.

India does not want Pakistan to die for if it does then all the acid created by ISI will flow eastwards. It suits India well for Pakistan to remain and bear the consequences of what it does / did.

indian stratergist had hoped that america will attack Pakistan
you can only faltulate now , your god America has not been able to pin us down
 
. .
which resposible nation will use nuclear weapons on a drop of a hat.arent NW used as a last option.if not then why does a nation need an army, airforce or navy.
 
.
indian stratergist had hoped that america will attack Pakistan
you can only faltulate now , your god America has not been able to pin us down

The insurgency by TTP will weaken Pakistan, the organization emerged as backlash of polices of Zia ul Haq.
 
.
indian stratergist had hoped that america will attack Pakistan
you can only faltulate now , your god America has not been able to pin us down
Our god? You beg for money from them, your nawaz sharif moans for Kashmir in front of US.
 
.
I fail to see, is even why would India attack Pakistan. There is no reason for India to start a war. Kashmir is the only issue that is the main concern between the two nations, and even that is is dying out for India, and India is fine with the current status. So unless Pakistan starts a full blown attempt to take Kashmir, I don't see any reason for a nuclear war between the two nations. Pakistan has its own internal issues to deal with, and India has its own, neither of which can be solved with nukes. And in this day and age nukes are nothing more than power symbol to deter each other.
 
.
which resposible nation will use nuclear weapons on a drop of a hat.arent NW used as a last option.if not then why does a nation need an army, airforce or navy.
You know In the Cold war the EU countries added a wide range of tactical nuclear weapons into it's arsenal which were Planned to be used extensively along side the conventional weapons because they knew they could never match the Conventional power of the Warsaw pact armies.
 
Last edited:
.
Pakistan should fight 1000 years war with TTP, then another 1000 years war in Balouchistan. Then we will have nuclear holocaust.

Jokes apart Pakistan dont have oil for one week war and taking about nuclear war. Every one know state of PAF..
Any link to that? Because we all know IA is low on Ammo http://news.oneindia.in/2012/04/06/army-has-ammunition-for-10-days-in-war-situation.html http://articles.timesofindia.indiat...-vice-chief-tatra-trucks-defence-preparedness
 
.
It would be stupidity of Pakistani magnitude for India to attack Pakistan.


Pakistan is dying and changing from the inside. Any Indian attack would compromise the slow but inevitable logical conclusion of this process.
 
.

Dear the main reasons India is not retaliating is because MMS has been advised that India should not retaliate so that the war between Jihadists & Pak Army continues:

From the time he took office, Prime Minister Singh has been persuaded that the costs of even a limited war will outweigh its likely benefits. Large-scale retaliation, his advisors argue, comes with unforseeable risks of escalation -unacceptable in a nuclear environment, and deeply damaging to the economy. It will, the argument goes, play into the hands of hawks in Pakistan's army, rallying the country's people behind them. It will allow the army to rebuild its fences with the jihadists it is now fighting in Pakistan's north-west. To avoid these outcomes, they argue, its well worth India absorbing a few body-blows.

http://m.firstpost.com/india/keran-...mokeunanswered-questions--1159751.html?page=4

@karan.1970 @Roybot @kurup @kaykay @OrionHunter @Contrarian
 
. . .
India has many options than direct war with Pakistan. We should be more envolve in pak western border. Why engage our soldiers in fighting we can do it without using them...
 
.
Back
Top Bottom