Stereotyping Saudi Arabia

[al-Hasani]

Most of the issues raised in these books are true and factual..so I wouldn't say they are stereotyping..may be biased!

Replace "most" with some. Otherwise you are simple not being honest. Besides have you even read the book that was mentioned? I doubt anyone on this forum has. And the lies the author of the article picked up and highlighted already disqualifies that certain book. At least to that degree that far from everything described is even remotely correct.

 

[Yzd Khalifa]

Lost of nonsense, inventions of history, non-factual events and the usual Zionist spin after taking a quick glance at your post.

I will be back with a reply tomorrow so don't go anywhere.

I wouldn't be startled seeing him coming back for more. Even though that I do hold a huge respect for Judaism, but if you care to read their history, you will be seeing a pattern of resemblance between who they are now, and who they were used to be.

 

[-SINAN-]

They don't succeed at all with their low IQ: what inventions by the saudis?
Not amazing why they are so fanatics car bombers & beheaders

National IQ Scores - Country Rankings

All countries parasited by the JEW USA are lazy, uncompetent, dependant who can only buy buy and buy again. So the JEW USA can exterminate them when it's good for them.

You don't have right to criticize about anyones IQ.

 

[iajj]

there has always been this jew smear campaign against stereotyping, which is in essence just distilled folk wisdom that saw through the many masks jewry put on for what jews really are!

how can we allow the examples of a few non-zionist jews that escaped from jew stereotypes blind us from the monumental crimes jewry committed as a race, collectively, traditionally, and cumulatively? sure, we have seen in history a few noble antisemitic jews like karl marx, but most of the jews we encounter in real life and all the jews we encounter on this forum like @Solomon2 have all confirmed to us the wisdom of stereotyping and the wisdom of those determined leaders who understood the essence of a racial battle and first raised their swords to cut down jewry as a species. the few antisemites who shunned their blood and sinister coracials have all tended to be more extreme and more convicted in their struggle against jewry, and one may say that old karl, if he were ever in the position to do so, would have done a more laudable job than old adolf.

and stereotypes about low-IQ saudis, while not as politically useful as antisemitic stereotypes, are valuable knowledge in conducting international business.

 

[Solomon2]

Please destroy it one more time.

In this thread? If such a request came from anyone other than you I'd refer them to another thread.

After all if every other "fact" other than the one that suits your narrative is wrong, then I must hear the other "correct" facts on Israel's existence...I mean seriously, how stupid are we -

You exhibit a disease all-too-common among the moderators here, holding that objective facts don't exist, or those that do can be cited out of context to construct a convenient toy. What is the value, then, of me recounting the history to you?

Surely you're intelligent enough to construct the pro-Israel "narrative" (as you like to put it) and post it yourself. If you don't treasure the value of truth for truth's sake, if facts are merely a tool wielded to get your way and discarded when they don't serve, how can you claim that you care about justice impartially served? And if you don't care, then what does it mean when you invoke "justice" to justify hostile attitudes or acts to selected foreigners or even your fellow Pakistanis?

Zion can do no wrong, we're all stupid to not have accepted what is being shoved down our through manipulated history for a hundred years now.

It can be very tough for Pakistanis to accept that, on the whole, Jews are better behaved than Muslims and that Jews run their country much more humanely than many Muslims dream of running their own. It's called envy. I think Pakistanis would be better off if they could discuss this issue more openly, don't you?

Finally, I find it curious that a moderator, of all people, has pushed to turn a "Saudi" thread into an "Israel" thread. Can you explain to us your motivations to do so?

 

[SQ8]

Finally, I find it curious that a moderator, of all people, has pushed to turn a "Saudi" thread into an "Israel" thread. Can you explain to us your motivations to do so?

To see how you would dodge the question. Why dont you point me to the correct thread then?

 

[Solomon2]

To see how you would dodge the question. Why dont you point me to the correct thread then?

Here's one.

Now, why do you leave MY questions unanswered?

 

[Solomon2]

Lost of nonsense, inventions of history, non-factual events and the usual Zionist spin after taking a quick glance at your post. I will be back with a reply tomorrow so don't go anywhere.

You asked for a day and I've given you a week.

You cited no specifics to back up your accusations. You've been plenty active on PDF since - apparently you have more time on your hands than I - but perhaps you need another day or two?

Otherwise, why shouldn't readers here conclude that I, the Jew, am more reputable than you, the Saudi Arab?

 

[al-Hasani]

You asked for a day and I've given you a week.

You cited no specifics to back up your accusations. You've been plenty active on PDF since - apparently you have more time on your hands than I - but perhaps you need another day or two?

Otherwise, why shouldn't readers here conclude that I, the Jew, am more reputable than you, the Saudi Arab?

I already countered your nonsense in all the previous posts were I also caught you making false claims. Same as the other day in the Tanzanian debate where you made a nonsense claim again that I countered by providing sources that told the opposite story. Why should I waste further time with a person who has demonstrated his lack of knowledge about the Arab world and Saudi Arabia in particularly on numerous occasions? Let alone a Zionist?

Besides Oscar countered you very fine.

 

[SQ8]

Here's one.

Now, why do you leave MY questions unanswered?

Ill answer them in one sentence based on that post.

WHO gave the British right to acknowledge the Palestine was the homeland for immigrant jews? And hence, I reiterate; That particular "mandate" is kosher because it suits the zionist narrative. Even though in basic human decency, It is HARAM.

 

[Solomon2]

I already countered your nonsense in all the previous posts were I also caught you making false claims.

Uh-uh. You merely claimed they were false. You didn't demonstrate that they were false. That is what you promised - and failed - to provide readers of this thread.

It's the difference between establishing what things are, what they are named, and what they are called:

"Or else what?" said Alice, for the Knight had made a sudden pause.

"Or else it doesn't, you know. The name of the song is called 'Haddocks' Eyes.'"

"Oh, that's the name of the song, is it?" Alice said, trying to feel interested.

"No, you don't understand," the Knight said, looking a little vexed. "That's what the name is called. The name really is 'The Aged, Aged Man.'"

"Then I ought to have said 'That's what the song is called'?" Alice corrected herself.

"No you oughtn't: that's another thing. The song is called 'Ways and Means' but that's only what it's called, you know!"

"Well, what is the song then?" said Alice, who was by this time completely bewildered.

"I was coming to that," the Knight said. "The song really is 'A-sitting On a Gate': and the tune's my own invention." ...
​

(Note the additional complication in the discussion: what names are called. It's all very important to sort these things out before one can judge matters correctly.)

Same as the other day in the Tanzanian debate where you made a nonsense claim again that I countered by -

That's the "red herring" fallacy. I asked a question and provided a link. I made no "nonsense claim".

Besides Oscar countered you very fine.

Really?

 

[Solomon2]

WHO gave the British right to acknowledge the Palestine was the homeland for immigrant jews?

The Caliph of the Ottomans and the League of Nations.

That particular "mandate" is kosher because it suits the zionist narrative. Even though in basic human decency, It is HARAM.

I see that you do not - or will not - debate my account. By default, you accept that it's correct.

So describe now your concepts of HARAM and "basic human decency". That is, after all, what you're hinging your hostility to myself and Israel upon, the barrier you're using to keep you from unconditionally supporting the millions of Jews of Israel over the genocidal ambitions of their enemies.

 

[SQ8]

I see that you do not - or will not - debate my account. By default, you accept that it's correct.

So describe now your concepts of HARAM and "basic human decency". That is, after all, what you're hinging your hostility to myself and Israel upon, the barrier you're using to keep you from unconditionally supporting the millions of Jews of Israel over the genocidal ambitions of their enemies.

Now you are playing the victim mentality. I am not at all averse to debate, but here you are only willing to listen to your narrative and when the simple question is asked as to where the support for the British mandate came from without the opinion of the Palestinian Arabs you are citing semantics. So either I am "absorbed" by hate, or you by blind adherence to your narrative; which in that post is nothing less.. Illywood both in prose and narrative as the so called Pallywood you wish to denigrate. So, NO..as much as you would like to assume and walk away, I DO NOT accept your account.

Just because I chose not to engage in Victorian length essays and stuck to an oscar wilde approach does not mean a default admission.

 

[Solomon2]

Now you are playing the victim mentality.

Explain how I am "playing the victim mentality", please.

 

[BLACKEAGLE]

WHO gave the British right to acknowledge the Palestine was the homeland for immigrant jews?]/quote]The Caliph of the Ottomans and the League of Nations.

I see that you do not - or will not - debate my account. By default, you accept that it's correct.

So describe now your concepts of HARAM and "basic human decency". That is, after all, what you're hinging your hostility to myself and Israel upon, the barrier you're using to keep you from unconditionally supporting the millions of Jews of Israel over the genocidal ambitions of their enemies.

Typical of you, you tried here to change the subject and divert it by pointing out three different things in just one post, of course all of you turn to use victim card when you have nothing to say.