ashok mourya
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2014
- Messages
- 1,957
- Reaction score
- -22
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There crime was being non-BengaliI wonder where did so much anger for the Biharis come from? What did the Biharis do to be hated so much?
Then why were they not killed before 16th Dec, 1971? Why were the Indian soldiers (non Bengalis) also killed? Why were the Pakistani Army + civilians (non bengalis) spared?There crime was being non-Bengali
source, list, anything? even if this happened it was reprisal if u punch a Bengali ten times he will at least return one.Cantonment did not house non-Bengali officers/soldiers alone. There were thousands of incidents where Bengali soldiers killed their non-Bengali officers.
So as many countries consider Kashmirs as freedom fighters..and how many countries fought PakistanMukti Bahinis were the liberators and not terrorists as recognised by most of the countries who opposed and fought against the rapine and genocide of Pakistani army and forced them to surrender ultimately and kicked them out of there country.
Why not you prove that the cantonments exclusively housed non-Bengalis?source, list, anything? even if this happened it was reprisal if u punch a Bengali ten times he will at least return one.
First of all these are not my "claims" but facts which are accepted by Bangaldeshi gov. itself and whole world.I can quote more neutral sources if you want.As for Pakistani shaheens,hollowness of his claims can be easily seen by the fact that he had to bring in Kashmir issue to gulp down the shame associated with the 1971 genocide and rapine.@jarves do u have any credibility to prove ur claims ?? can u deny the facts that @Pakistani Shaheen posted ??
yes, you balmed it on Gen A.A.K Niazi"Kill 3 millions and they will eat out of our hand"- whatever his name was
Ahh, bangla govt. the world knows they're indian puppet. overFirst of all these are not my "claims" but facts which are accepted by Bangaldeshi gov. itself and whole world.I can quote more neutral sources if you want.As for Pakistani shaheens,hollowness of his claims can be easily seen by the fact that he had to bring in Kashmir issue to gulp down the shame associated with the 1971 genocide and rapine.
WOW Google images, who knows weather they were raped by Indians or Pakistanis? cuz Indians are more popular for rape you knowLooks like i touched a raw nerve here.,No need to cry so much,I can post more pics if you want like this.........
View attachment 188732
of course it did , non bengalis comprised 90% of the army so most of them were non bengalis believe it or not.Why not you prove that the cantonments exclusively housed non-Bengalis?
Pakistani troops stationed in East Pakistan comprised of 90% West Pakistanis (non-Bengalis)? Either you are a big time joker or totally oblivious of the historical facts.of course it did , non bengalis comprised 90% of the army so most of them were non bengalis believe it or not.
Keep dreaming idiot.....what do you know about hudood ordinance...do you even know what does hudood means let alone the ordinance. Your army is a certified rapist even with your own people...all this talk about getting punished by your law, yet you don't even spare foreigners, wether it's a bus or rickshaw or at I they are no where save, keep you bs about bolouchistan you should rather more worry about your own vegetarian rapists.the difference is, rapists in india (army or civilian) get punished because the culture does not accept that. in your country (pakistan) rape is almost legal due to the hudood ordinance. and your army is on another level if reports that manage to get out of balochistan are to be believed