What's new

SSN22 Sunburn missiles: How Pakistan can neutralise the threat of India's aircraft carrier!

It is very simple logic: We are not an agreesor state and our doctorine is based on "defensive" approach.

Can't say the same about Indians though, with extremist mentality of "Akhand Bahart" sitting in the govt there...

It is very simple logic: We are not an agreesor state and our doctorine is based on "defensive" approach.

Can't say the same about Indians though, with extremist mentality of "Akhand Bahart" sitting in the govt there...
Not really, lets assume your akhand bharat theory is Indian govt's policy but then who will capture terrorism effected western neighbour, who will bear the suicide bombings on weekly basis?
That akhand bharat is just any over patriotic and emotional wish.
We are actually better now without akhand bharat.
Now coming to your "defensive theory" lol
who believe in kashmiri freedom fighters, who sends them into IK?
Whose motto is this "we will nuke this, we will nuke that" :D
Who invaded kashmir in 1948?
Now coming to our increasing weapons theory, we are not aggressor but defender of our land.
We know we have to prepare for a two front war and hence we need to improve our strength.
Still lots of things to be done to get ready for a two front war, and we are working on it but the process is slow.
 
. . .
aray yar agar main app ko kahon,india main poverty ghatum karlo weapons kharedna zaroori nahe hai,dard to ho ga.take care.

although poverty remains widespread in India, progress has been substantial. In India, the poverty rate fell from 49 per cent in 1994 to 42 per cent in 2005 and to 33 per cent in 2010. If the current pace continues, India will meet the poverty reduction target by 2015,"

That shows our commitment towards poverty reduction. We can balance things and can you say the same for Pakistan. ?
 
.
this is just a movie (The Sum of All Fears) but it shows a US aircraft carrier being sunk by missiles fired by Soviet Tu-22 bombers...(conventional).


There are many flaws in that movie. No aircraft to meet the bombers when they are detected far from the carrier. No ships defending the carrier.
 
.
although poverty remains widespread in India, progress has been substantial. In India, the poverty rate fell from 49 per cent in 1994 to 42 per cent in 2005 and to 33 per cent in 2010. If the current pace continues, India will meet the poverty reduction target by 2015,"

That shows our commitment towards poverty reduction. We can balance things and can you say the same for Pakistan. ?
actually i cant.would only believe it,if it happens.
 
.
...as if the carrier takes a stroll with no support and radars off in the high seas...hmph!
 
.
then 10 fully loaded Su30 mki with few jag will be enouhg for entire PN
Send your AC and SU-30MKI for blockade
1)Su30 mki with few jag will be enough for entire PN.
2)Chinese missiles are crap.
3)Cm-400akg is nothing
That all will be confirmed in 24 hours.

If the current pace continues, India will meet the poverty reduction target by 2015,
346 days left your claim will be verified bookmark it.
 
.
Send your AC and SU-30MKI for blockade
1)Su30 mki with few jag will be enough for entire PN.
2)Chinese missiles are crap.
3)Cm-400akg is nothing
That all will be confirmed in 24 hours.


346 days left your claim will be verified bookmark it.

Dude bookmark it , We will do better than expected . We are very close to our target.
 
.
I think we should induct capable missile defence shield than induct silent subs as much as we can and dedicted naval air arm with 2 to 3 squadrons to destroy indian ships buy doing this indian ships will divert because they have enemy under water in the air and on surface there will be diversions to whom they attack first but our navy should attack them at same time from air under water and and from surface of sea and missiles from land barrage of missiles
 
.
You missed the point. Given the geography, Indian lanes will remain open because you just can't threaten all our ports and shipping lanes, but thats not the case with you.

I never said you can not inflict damage on our assets. You can, but you can not protect shipping lanes. Fact. And commercia captains do no sail if the lanes are not protected.

PN can threaten all major Indian ports that is why IN is rushing for P-8s, subs are old and still good option for sea denial.
 
. . .
With what?

with Subs, even one Agosta 90 B with AIP will be enough to keep IN on its toes at Vishakapatnum, although PN will receive new subs soon and they will be most deadly subs in PN arsenal.
 
.
with Subs, even one Agosta 90 B with AIP will be enough to keep IN on its toes at Vishakapatnum, although PN will receive new subs soon and they will be most deadly subs in PN arsenal.

Well Indian Navy is always on its toes, that is one of the reasons for its splendid performance in past conflicts.

Pakistan has 3 Agosta 90 subs against 9 Kilos, 4 Type 209s, 1 Akula, 1 Arihant another 6 scorpenes will be joining Indian Navy starting this year.

Deal for 1 Akula, 3 Arihant(in building), Another 6 conventional subs might be signed pretty soon but lets not count the subs whose deals haven't even been signed yet..including Chinese subs for Pakistan, who's deal is also not signed yet.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom